Wolbachia Influences the Maternal Transmission of the gypsy Endogenous Retrovirus in Drosophila melanogaster

ABSTRACT The endosymbiotic bacteria of the genus Wolbachia are present in most insects and are maternally transmitted through the germline. Moreover, these intracellular bacteria exert antiviral activity against insect RNA viruses, as in Drosophila melanogaster, which could explain the prevalence of Wolbachia bacteria in natural populations. Wolbachia is maternally transmitted in D. melanogaster through a mechanism that involves distribution at the posterior pole of mature oocytes and then incorporation into the pole cells of the embryos. In parallel, maternal transmission of several endogenous retroviruses is well documented in D. melanogaster. Notably, gypsy retrovirus is expressed in permissive follicle cells and transferred to the oocyte and then to the offspring by integrating into their genomes. Here, we show that the presence of Wolbachia wMel reduces the rate of gypsy insertion into the ovo gene. However, the presence of Wolbachia does not modify the expression levels of gypsy RNA and envelope glycoprotein from either permissive or restrictive ovaries. Moreover, Wolbachia affects the pattern of distribution of the retroviral particles and the gypsy envelope protein in permissive follicle cells. Altogether, our results enlarge the knowledge of the antiviral activity of Wolbachia to include reducing the maternal transmission of endogenous retroviruses in D. melanogaster. IMPORTANCE Animals have established complex relationships with bacteria and viruses that spread horizontally among individuals or are vertically transmitted, i.e., from parents to offspring. It is well established that members of the genus Wolbachia, maternally inherited symbiotic bacteria present mainly in arthropods, reduce the replication of several RNA viruses transmitted horizontally. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that Wolbachia diminishes the maternal transmission of gypsy, an endogenous retrovirus in Drosophila melanogaster. We hypothesize that gypsy cannot efficiently integrate into the germ cells of offspring during embryonic development in the presence of Wolbachia because both are competitors for localization to the posterior pole of the egg. More generally, it would be of interest to analyze the influence of Wolbachia on vertically transmitted exogenous viruses, such as some arboviruses. Animals have established complex relationships with bacteria and viruses that spread horizontally among individuals or are vertically transmitted, i.e., from parents to offspring. It is well established that members of the genus Wolbachia, maternally inherited symbiotic bacteria present mainly in arthropods, reduce the replication of several RNA viruses transmitted horizontally. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that Wolbachia diminishes the maternal transmission of gypsy, an endogenous retrovirus in Drosophila melanogaster. We hypothesize that gypsy cannot efficiently integrate into the germ cells of offspring during embryonic development in the presence of Wolbachia because both are competitors for localization to the posterior pole of the egg. More generally, it would be of interest to analyze the influence of Wolbachia on vertically transmitted exogenous viruses, such as some arboviruses.

[1]  L. Banks,et al.  Human papillomavirus (HPV)‐18 E6 oncoprotein interferes with the epithelial cell polarity Par3 protein , 2014, Molecular oncology.

[2]  T. Wei,et al.  Transovarial Transmission of a Plant Virus Is Mediated by Vitellogenin of Its Insect Vector , 2014, PLoS pathogens.

[3]  Isabelle Dietrich,et al.  Understanding the Wolbachia-mediated inhibition of arboviruses in mosquitoes: progress and challenges. , 2014, The Journal of general virology.

[4]  F. Jiggins,et al.  Wolbachia Variants Induce Differential Protection to Viruses in Drosophila melanogaster: A Phenotypic and Phylogenomic Analysis , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[5]  F. Shanahan,et al.  Digestion of epithelial tight junction proteins by the commensal Clostridium perfringens. , 2013, American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology.

[6]  Qianjun Li,et al.  The interaction between claudin-1 and dengue viral prM/M protein for its entry. , 2013, Virology.

[7]  H. Frydman,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved Wolbachia-encoded factors control pattern of stem-cell niche tropism in Drosophila ovaries and favor infection , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  S. Asgari,et al.  Wolbachia uses a host microRNA to regulate transcripts of a methyltransferase, contributing to dengue virus inhibition in Aedes aegypti , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  B. Lemaître,et al.  Vertical Transmission of a Drosophila Endosymbiont Via Cooption of the Yolk Transport and Internalization Machinery , 2013, mBio.

[10]  A. Failloux,et al.  The Native Wolbachia Symbionts Limit Transmission of Dengue Virus in Aedes albopictus , 2012, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[11]  Karyn N. Johnson,et al.  The Small Interfering RNA Pathway Is Not Essential for Wolbachia-Mediated Antiviral Protection in Drosophila melanogaster , 2012, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[12]  F. Rixon,et al.  Drosophila melanogaster as a Model Organism for Bluetongue Virus Replication and Tropism , 2012, Journal of Virology.

[13]  J. Welch,et al.  Population Genomics of the Wolbachia Endosymbiont in Drosophila melanogaster , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[14]  C. Vieira,et al.  tirant, a Newly Discovered Active Endogenous Retrovirus in Drosophila simulans , 2012, Journal of Virology.

[15]  Jonathan A. Eisen,et al.  Bacterial Communities of Diverse Drosophila Species: Ecological Context of a Host–Microbe Model System , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[16]  Karly M. Turner,et al.  The wMelPop strain of Wolbachia interferes with dopamine levels in Aedes aegypti , 2011, Parasites & Vectors.

[17]  M. Ashburner,et al.  The Bacterial Symbiont Wolbachia Induces Resistance to RNA Viral Infections in Drosophila melanogaster , 2008, PLoS biology.

[18]  Karyn N. Johnson,et al.  Wolbachia and Virus Protection in Insects , 2008, Science.

[19]  T. Hatta,et al.  Tick vitellogenin receptor reveals critical role in oocyte development and transovarial transmission of Babesia parasite. , 2008, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.

[20]  J. Samarut,et al.  A Mechanism Regulating the Onset of Sox2 Expression in the Embryonic Neural Plate , 2008, PLoS biology.

[21]  Richard G Melvin,et al.  Tetracycline treatment influences mitochondrial metabolism and mtDNA density two generations after treatment in Drosophila , 2007, Insect molecular biology.

[22]  W. Sullivan,et al.  A Cellular Basis for Wolbachia Recruitment to the Host Germline , 2007, PLoS pathogens.

[23]  Manolis Kellis,et al.  Discrete Small RNA-Generating Loci as Master Regulators of Transposon Activity in Drosophila , 2007, Cell.

[24]  Alain Bucheton,et al.  A Novel Repeat-Associated Small Interfering RNA-Mediated Silencing Pathway Downregulates Complementary Sense gypsy Transcripts in Somatic Cells of the Drosophila Ovary , 2006, Journal of Virology.

[25]  Drew N. Robson,et al.  Somatic stem cell niche tropism in Wolbachia , 2006, Nature.

[26]  F. Giorgi,et al.  Viral particles of the endogenous retrovirus ZAM from Drosophila melanogaster use a pre-existing endosome/exosome pathway for transfer to the oocyte , 2006, Retrovirology.

[27]  Jennifer M. Li,et al.  Wolbachia Utilizes Host Microtubules and Dynein for Anterior Localization in the Drosophila Oocyte , 2005, PLoS pathogens.

[28]  W. Miller,et al.  Evidence for a Global Wolbachia Replacement in Drosophila melanogaster , 2005, Current Biology.

[29]  G. Devauchelle,et al.  Analysis of the Drosophila gypsy endogenous retrovirus envelope glycoprotein. , 2004, The Journal of general virology.

[30]  A. Pélisson,et al.  Evidence for a piwi-Dependent RNA Silencing of the gypsy Endogenous Retrovirus by the Drosophila melanogaster flamenco Gene , 2004, Genetics.

[31]  B. Dastugue,et al.  Expression of the Idefix retrotransposon in early follicle cells in the germarium of Drosophila melanogaster is determined by its LTR sequences and a specific genomic context , 2002, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[32]  C. Ferraz,et al.  Evolution of the Gypsy endogenous retrovirus in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[33]  J. Boeke,et al.  A hotspot for the Drosophila gypsy retroelement in the ovo locus. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  A. Pélisson,et al.  Expression of the Drosophila retrovirus gypsy as ultrastructurally detectable particles in the ovaries of flies carrying a permissive flamenco allele. , 1997, The Journal of general virology.

[35]  J. Boeke,et al.  Infection of the germ line by retroviral particles produced in the follicle cells: a possible mechanism for the mobilization of the gypsy retroelement of Drosophila. , 1997, Development.

[36]  A. Bucheton,et al.  Flamenco, a gene controlling the gypsy retrovirus of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1995, Genetics.

[37]  V. Corces,et al.  Gypsy transposition correlates with the production of a retroviral envelope‐like protein under the tissue‐specific control of the Drosophila flamenco gene. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[38]  J. Boeke,et al.  An env-like protein encoded by a Drosophila retroelement: evidence that gypsy is an infectious retrovirus. , 1994, Genes & development.

[39]  A. Pélisson,et al.  Retroviruses in invertebrates: the gypsy retrotransposon is apparently an infectious retrovirus of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  M. Mariol,et al.  Mobilization of the gypsy and copia retrotransposons in Drosophila melanogaster induces reversion of the ovoD dominant female‐sterile mutations: molecular analysis of revertant alleles , 1989, The EMBO journal.