Automatic Classification and Analysis of Interdisciplinary Fields in Computer Sciences

In the last two decades, there have been studies claiming that science is becoming ever more interdisciplinary. However, the evidence has been anecdotal or partial. Here for the first time, we investigate a large size citation network of computer science domain with the intention to develop an automated unsupervised classification model that can efficiently distinguish the core and the interdisciplinary research fields. For this purpose, we propose four indicative features, three of these are directly related to the topological structure of the citation network, while the fourth is an external indicator based on the attractiveness of a field for the in-coming researchers. The significance of each of these features in characterizing interdisciplinary is measured independently and then systematically accumulated to build an unsupervised classification model. The result of the classification model shows two distinctive clusters that clearly distinguish core and interdisciplinary fields of computer science domain. Based on this classification, we further study the evolution dynamics at a microscopic level to show how interdisciplinarity emerges through cross-fertilization of ideas between the fields that otherwise have little overlap as they are mostly studied independently. Finally, to understand the overall impact of interdisciplinary research on the entire domain, we analyze selective citation based measurements of core and interdisciplinary fields, paper submission and acceptance statistics at top-tier conferences and the core-periphery structure of citation network, and observe an increasing impact of the interdisciplinary fields along with their steady integration with the computer science core in recent times.

[1]  Richard N. Zare,et al.  Interdisciplinary Research: From Belief to Reality , 1999, Science.

[2]  J. Klein,et al.  Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. , 1991 .

[3]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Yuval Shavitt,et al.  A model of Internet topology using k-shell decomposition , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Xiaoming Liu,et al.  SLPA: Uncovering Overlapping Communities in Social Networks via a Speaker-Listener Interaction Dynamic Process , 2011, 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops.

[6]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[7]  Ed C. M. Noyons,et al.  A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[8]  Sidney Redner,et al.  Community structure of the physical review citation network , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[9]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[10]  Jie Tang,et al.  ArnetMiner: extraction and mining of academic social networks , 2008, KDD.

[11]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  The evolution of interdisciplinarity in physics research , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity , 2007, Scientometrics.

[13]  Niloy Ganguly,et al.  Computer science fields as ground-truth communities: Their impact, rise and fall , 2013, 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2013).

[14]  G. Heimeriks,et al.  Disciplinary, Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary: Concepts and Indicators. , 2001 .

[15]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators , 2001, Scientometrics.