Exploring a pioneering bioenergy system: The case of Enköping in Sweden

In order to contribute to knowledge on how-to expand bioenergy this paper examines an example of success from Sweden. The idea is to identify factors that can explain the difference between success and failure of bioenergy systems. In the aftermath of the oil crises in the 1970s, the local government in the town of Enkoping in Sweden was cautioned by the local Swedish military regiment to shift towards domestic energy supplies rather than imported fossil fuels. During the decades that followed the local energy companies developed a pioneering bioenergy system. There are 3 important conditions relevant, to explain the success: (1) the introduction of the carbon tax in Sweden provided market conditions making bioenergy sufficiently competitive with fossil fuels; (2) the know-how developed by the local energy companies through experimentation and collaboration with research institutions encouraged investments in local opportunities; and (3), the formation of partnerships in a regional network of actors, including private companies providing biofuels and technology, research institutions, and local government, helped to co-ordinate the development of the bioenergy system. (Less)

[1]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[2]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[3]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Handbook of organization studies , 1997 .

[4]  Anders Roos,et al.  Market development problems for sustainable bio-energy systems in Sweden. (The BIOMARK project) , 2004 .

[5]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Applications of case study research , 1993 .

[6]  Colin Eden,et al.  Action research for the study of organizations , 1996 .

[7]  Richard L. Ottinger,et al.  Compendium of Sustainable Energy Laws: Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC , 2005 .

[8]  Richard L. Ottinger,et al.  Compendium of Sustainable Energy Laws: Directive 2001/77/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2001 on the Promotion of Electricity Produced from Renewable Energy Sources in the Internal Electricity Market , 2005 .

[9]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[10]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[11]  Manuel V. Heitor,et al.  Regional development and conditions for innovation in the network society , 2005 .

[12]  Tomas Kåberger Swedish Nuclear Power and Economic Rationalities , 2002 .

[13]  B. Boog The Emancipatory Character of Action Research, its History and the Present State of the Art , 2003 .

[14]  C. Freeman Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[15]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  ‘With a Little Help From Our Friends’: Public-Private Partnerships as Institutions and Instruments , 1998 .

[16]  Ralph E H Sims The Brilliance of Bioenergy: In Business and In Practice , 2002 .

[17]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Systems of innovation perspectives and challenges , 2004 .

[18]  S. Ottosson Participation action research-: A key to improved knowledge of management , 2003 .

[19]  M. Kaltschmitt,et al.  Energy from biomass—do non-technical barriers prevent an increased use? , 1999 .

[20]  P. Svenningsson,et al.  The use of biomass for energy in Sweden - Critical factors and lessons learned , 2002 .

[21]  Fredrik von Malmborg,et al.  Conditions for regional public-private partnerships for sustainable development - Swedish perspectives , 2003 .

[22]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  Bioenergy policy and market development in Finland and Sweden , 2004 .

[23]  O. J. Andersen Public–Private Partnerships: Organisational Hybrids as Channels for Local Mobilisation and Participation?1 , 2004 .

[24]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[25]  Anders Roos,et al.  Critical factors to bioenergy implementation. , 1999 .

[26]  John Holmberg,et al.  Socio-ecological Indicators for Sustainability. , 1996 .

[27]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[28]  Jon Pierre,et al.  Partnerships in urban governance : European and American experience , 1998 .

[29]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  Pathways to Sustainability: Evolution or Revolution? , 2005 .