Overcoming barriers for eLearning in universities - portfolio models for eCompetence development of faculty

This paper explores the role that eCompetence of faculty members play in the integration of eLearning in higher education. Learning technologies have the potential to enhance educational innovation, but the eLearning adoption rate of faculty in universities is so far disappointing. The motivation and capability of faculty to use information and communication technologies (ICT) in teaching and learning is influenced by competence development measures and wider institutional incentives that universities offer. The paper presents the findings of an international survey on eCompetence measures for faculty in 23 universities. Results show that traditional ICT training courses do not sufficiently motivate faculty to acquire the required competences and to engage in eLearning. Universities have to create innovative portfolios for faculty development which extend both the scope and breadth of formal training with non-formal measures like communities of practice, peer groups and networks. Beyond these competence development measures, institutional incentives like eLearning rewards and career opportunities for eLearning champions increase the motivation of faculty to sustainably use learning technologies for their courses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Ali Ekrem Ozkul,et al.  The tortoise and the hare enigma in e-transformation in Japanese and Korean higher education , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[2]  Richard N. Katz,et al.  Balancing Technology and Tradition: The Example of Course Management Systems. , 2003 .

[3]  D. Leslie,et al.  Resolving the Dispute: Teaching is Academe's Core Value , 2002 .

[4]  Dieter Euler.  Gestaltung der Kompetenzentwicklung von E-Learning-Promotoren , 2004 .

[5]  Allan Ellis,et al.  Competency, capability, complexity and computers: exploring a new model for conceptualising end-user computer education , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[6]  Alan M. Saks.  Transfer of Training and Self‐efficacy: What is the Dilemma? , 1997 .

[7]  D. Light,et al.  Introduction: The Structure of the Academic Professions , 1974 .

[8]  David W. Carraher,et al.  The Transfer Dilemma , 2002 .

[9]  Dirk Schneckenberg.  Understanding the real barriers to technology-enhanced innovation in higher education , 2009 .

[10]  Douglas Love,et al.  Portfolios to Webfolios and beyond: Levels of Maturation , 2004 .

[11]  Donald P. Ely,et al.  Conditions That Facilitate the Implementation of Educational Technology Innovations , 1990 .

[12]  Klaus North,et al.  Transparency and Transfer of Individual Competencies - A Concept of Integrative Competence Management , 2003, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[13]  Helen Barrett and Joanne Carney,et al.  Conflicting Paradigms and Competing Purposes in Electronic Portfolio Development , 2005 .

[14]  Sabine Seufert,et al.  E-Learning in Hochschulen und Bildungszentren , 2004 .

[15]  D. Mcclelland.  Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence". , 1973, The American psychologist.

[16]  K. Weick.  Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[17]  Nick Rushby.  The educational potential of e-portfolios - By Lorraine Stefani , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[18]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online , 2003 .

[19]  Tom Wengraf,et al.  Qualitative Research Interviewing , 2001 .

[20]  Chi-Cheng Chang.  A study on the evaluation and effectiveness analysis of web-based learning portfolio (WBLP) , 2001, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[21]  Caroline M. Crawford,et al.  Motivators and Inhibitors for University Faculty in Distance and e-learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[22]  Maggi Savin-Baden,et al.  Challenging Models and Perspectives of Problem-Based Learning , 2007 .