Congenital Micropenis: Long-Term Medical, Surgical and Psychosexual Follow-Up of Individuals Raised Male or Female

Objectives: to document long-term medical, surgical and psychosexual outcome of individuals with congenital micropenis (13 males, 5 females). Methods: Physical measurements from childhood were collected retrospectively from medical records and at adulthood by physical examination. An adult psychosexual assessment was conducted with a written questionnaire and oral discussion. Results: Adult penile length was below the normal mean in all men. Three women had vaginoplasty resulting in normal length. All men reported good or fair erections but 50% were dissatisfied with their genitalia. Dissatisfaction with body image resulted from having a small penis (66%), inadequate body hair (50%), gynecomastia (33%) and youthful appearance (33%). Ten men were heterosexual, 1 homosexual and 2 bisexual. Among women, 4 (80%) were dissatisfied with their genitalia. Three women reported average libido with orgasm and were also heterosexual. Two women had no sexual interest or experience. Finally, males were masculine and females feminine in their gender-role identity, and both groups were satisfied with their sex of rearing. Conclusions: Regarding choice of gender, male sex of rearing can result in satisfactory genito-sexual function. Female gender can also result in success, however it requires extensive feminizing surgery.

[1]  A. Fausto-Sterling THE FIVE SEXES , 1993 .

[2]  F. Conte,et al.  Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and micropenis: effect of testosterone treatment on adult penile size why sex reversal is not indicated. , 1999, The Journal of pediatrics.

[3]  D. A. Sholl,et al.  Growth at Adolescence , 1962 .

[4]  J. Money,et al.  Micropenis, family mental health, and neonatal management: A report on 14 patients reared as girls. , 1981 .

[5]  C. Woodhouse,et al.  Small penis and the male sexual role. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[6]  P. Walsh,et al.  Clinical and endocrinological evaluation of patients with congenital microphallus. , 1978, The Journal of urology.

[7]  J. Money,et al.  Micropenis: adult follow-up and comparison of size against new norms. , 1984, Journal of sex & marital therapy.

[8]  D. W. Smith,et al.  Fetal phallic growth and penile standards for newborn male infants. , 1975, The Journal of pediatrics.

[9]  J. Money,et al.  Micropenis. I. Criteria, etiologies and classification. , 1980, The Johns Hopkins medical journal.

[10]  G. Beebe,et al.  Normal Growth and Variation in the Male Genitalia from Birth to Maturity , 1942 .

[11]  J. Money,et al.  Psychology of syndromes. IQ and micropenis. , 1983, American journal of diseases of children.

[12]  F. Given,et al.  Vaginal length and sexual function after colpopexy for complete uterovaginal eversion. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  J. Money,et al.  Micropenis: gender, erotosexual coping strategy, and behavioral health in nine pediatric cases followed to adulthood. , 1985, Comprehensive psychiatry.

[14]  A S Calikoglu,et al.  SHOULD BOYS WITH MICROPENIS BE REARED AS GIRLS , 1999 .

[15]  I. Aaronson,et al.  Micropenis: medical and surgical implications. , 1994, The Journal of urology.