The Fetal Liver Afferent Venous Flow Volumes in Fetuses With Appropriate for Gestational Age Birth Weight

OBJECTIVES The present study aimed: 1) to simultaneously investigate the relationship between blood flow volumes of the two fetal liver afferent venous systems of normally appropriate for gestational age newborns. 2) to establish the normal reference range centiles values that will serve as a basis for future investigations. METHODS A cross-sectional, prospective study of singleton low obstetric risk pregnancies. Doppler examination included the measurement of the umbilical and the main portal vein vessels' diameters and time-averaged maximum velocity. The absolute and per kilogram of estimated fetal weight flow volumes and the ratio between the placental and portal blood volume flow were calculated from these data. RESULTS Three hundred and sixty-three pregnant women were included in the study. The umbilical and portal flow volumes' capacity to provide blood flow per kilogram of fetal weight, in the period of maximum fetal growth, was diverse. The placental flow decreased continuously from a mean of 121.2 mL/min/kg at the 20th week of gestation to 64.1 mL/min/kg at the 38th week of gestation. Meanwhile, the portal flow volume per kilogram of fetal weight increased from 9.6 mL/min/kg at 32 weeks of gestation to 10.3 at the 38th week of gestation. This resulted in a decrease in the umbilical to portal flow volume ratio from 13.3 to 9.6 during this period. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that in the period of maximum fetal growth, the placental/portal ratio diminishes emphasizing the portal flow's predominance with low oxygen and nutrient supply to the liver.

[1]  F Prefumo,et al.  Practice Guidelines , 2013 .

[2]  C. Cooper,et al.  Fetal Liver Blood Flow Distribution: Role in Human Developmental Strategy to Prioritize Fat Deposition versus Brain Development , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  T. Wilsgaard,et al.  Longitudinal reference ranges for umbilical vein blood flow at a free loop of the umbilical cord , 2010, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[4]  T. Wilsgaard,et al.  Agreement between umbilical vein volume blood flow measurements obtained at the intra‐abdominal portion and free loop of the umbilical cord , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[5]  T. Kiserud,et al.  The left portal vein as an indicator of watershed in the fetal circulation: development during the second half of pregnancy and a suggested method of evaluation , 2007, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  Agreement Between Methods of Measurement with Multiple Observations Per Individual , 2007, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[7]  T. Kiserud,et al.  The fetal portal vein: normal blood flow development during the second half of human pregnancy , 2007, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[8]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method is presented to plan the required sample size when estimating regression-based reference limits. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  Y. Ville,et al.  Error introduced into velocity measurements by inappropriate Doppler angle assignment , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[10]  T. Kiserud,et al.  Fetal cardiac output, distribution to the placenta and impact of placental compromise , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[11]  F. Mimouni,et al.  Birth weight standards in the live-born population in Israel. , 2005, The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ.

[12]  T. Wilsgaard,et al.  Reference ranges for umbilical vein blood flow in the second half of pregnancy based on longitudinal data , 2005, Prenatal diagnosis.

[13]  M. Hanson,et al.  Portal and umbilical venous blood supply to the liver in the human fetus near term , 2004, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[14]  G. Pennati,et al.  Spatial velocity profile changes along the cord in normal human fetuses: can these affect Doppler measurements of venous umbilical blood flow? , 2004, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[15]  T. Stijnen,et al.  Umbilical venous volume flow in the normally developing and growth‐restricted human fetus , 2002, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[16]  S Kertschanska,et al.  Liver blood perfusion as a possible instrument for fetal growth regulation. , 2002, Placenta.

[17]  E. Ferrazzi Measurement of venous blood flow in the human fetus: a dream comes true, but now for some standardization , 2001, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[18]  T. Kiserud,et al.  The development of high venous velocity at the fetal umbilical ring during gestational weeks 11–19 , 2001, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[19]  T. Kiserud,et al.  How repeat measurements affect the mean diameter of the umbilical vein and the ductus venosus , 1998, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[20]  P. Royston,et al.  How to construct ‘normal ranges’ for fetal variables , 1998, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[21]  D. Altman,et al.  Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[22]  R. Gill Measurement of blood flow by ultrasound: accuracy and sources of error. , 1985, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. , 1984, Radiology.

[24]  G. Kossoff,et al.  Fetal umbilical venous flow measured in utero by pulsed Doppler and B-mode ultrasound. I. Normal pregnancies. , 1981, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  K. O. Lewis,et al.  Measurement of human fetal blood flow. , 1980, British medical journal.

[26]  J. Emery FUNCTIONAL ASYMMETRY OF THE LIVER , 1963, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[27]  K. Maršál,et al.  Ultrasonic measurement of human fetal blood flow. , 1982, Journal of biomedical engineering.