I just wanna blame somebody, not something! Reactions to a computer agent giving negative feedback based on the instructions of a person

[1]  F. Eyssel,et al.  (S)he's Got the Look: Gender Stereotyping of Robots1 , 2012 .

[2]  Eric D. Ragan,et al.  The Role of Domain Expertise in User Trust and the Impact of First Impressions with Intelligent Systems , 2020, HCOMP.

[3]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Silicon sycophants: the effects of computers that flatter , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interactivity in human–computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence , 2000 .

[5]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[6]  Mark R. Leary,et al.  Toward a conceptualization of interpersonal rejection. , 2001 .

[7]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[8]  H. Kelley,et al.  Attribution theory and research. , 1980, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Source credibility, information favorability, and job offer acceptance , 1979 .

[10]  B. Malle,et al.  The Folk Concept of Intentionality , 1997 .

[11]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  The influence of robot anthropomorphism on the feelings of embarrassment when interacting with robots , 2010, Paladyn J. Behav. Robotics.

[12]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The measurement of interpersonal attraction , 1974 .

[13]  R. Dar,et al.  The Sense of Agency Scale: A Measure of Consciously Perceived Control over One's Mind, Body, and the Immediate Environment , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[14]  B. Bannister,et al.  Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback: interactive effects on recipient responses , 1986 .

[15]  R. Spears,et al.  Paralanguage and social perception in computer‐mediated communication , 1992 .

[16]  Barbara Di Eugenio,et al.  KSC-PaL: A Peer Learning Agent , 2010, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[17]  A. Edmondson.  Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[18]  David DeVault,et al.  The Benefits of Virtual Humans for Teaching Negotiation , 2016, IVA.

[19]  C. Bartneck,et al.  Robot abuse : a limitation of the media equation , 2005 .

[20]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Attitudinal and Intentional Acceptance of Domestic Robots by Younger and Older Adults , 2009, HCI.

[21]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  Effects of anticipated human-robot interaction and predictability of robot behavior on perceptions of anthropomorphism , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[22]  C. Nass,et al.  Technology and Roles: A Tale of Two TVs , 1996 .

[23]  Jaime Banks,et al.  A perceived moral agency scale: Development and validation of a metric for humans and social machines , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Artificial Intelligence, Responsibility Attribution, and a Relational Justification of Explainability , 2019, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[25]  Christian Keysers,et al.  The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[26]  Aurora Vizcaíno.  A Simulated Student Can Improve Collaborative Learning , 2005, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[27]  Steven J. Stroessner,et al.  The Robotic Social Attributes Scale (RoSAS): Development and Validation , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[28]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors , 1988 .

[29]  Wenji Mao,et al.  The Social Credit Assignment Problem , 2003, IVA.

[30]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Getting in Touch: How imagined, actual, and physical contact affect evaluations of robots , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[31]  Jonathan Gratch,et al.  Welcome to the Real World: How Agent Strategy Increases Human Willingness to Deceive , 2018, AAMAS.

[32]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  Gary Bente,et al.  Person perception effects of computer-simulated male and female head movement , 1996 .

[34]  Yochanan E. Bigman,et al.  People are averse to machines making moral decisions , 2018, Cognition.

[35]  C. Nass,et al.  Are People Polite to Computers? Responses to Computer-Based Interviewing Systems1 , 1999 .

[36]  D. Kostons,et al.  The anonymous reviewer: the relationship between perceived expertise and the perceptions of peer feedback in higher education , 2018 .

[37]  R. Emerson.  Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[38]  Arne Jönsson,et al.  Wizard of Oz studies -- why and how , 1993, Knowl. Based Syst..

[39]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Expectancies and the Evaluative Consequences of Violations , 1990 .

[40]  L J Skitka,et al.  Automation bias: decision making and performance in high-tech cockpits. , 1997, The International journal of aviation psychology.

[41]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[42]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Evaluated by a Machine. Effects of Negative Feedback by a Computer or Human Boss , 2017, IVA.

[43]  G. W. Bradley.  Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. , 1978 .

[44]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory , 2000 .

[45]  Byron Reeves,et al.  The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces , 2000, CHI.

[46]  W. Wilson,et al.  PROJECTION, ATTRACTION, AND STRATEGY CHOICES IN INTERGROUP COMPETITION. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  Florian Schneider,et al.  Impertinent mobiles - Effects of politeness and impoliteness in human-smartphone interaction , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[48]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Human Mental Models of Humanoid Robots , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[49]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  The elements of computer credibility , 1999, CHI '99.

[50]  Louis-Philippe Morency,et al.  It's only a computer: Virtual humans increase willingness to disclose , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  Jun-Gi Park,et al.  Effects of team member psychological proximity on teamwork performance , 2014 .

[52]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  "It doesn't matter what you are!" Explaining social effects of agents and avatars , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[53]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Great Expectations? Relation of Previous Experiences With Social Robots in Real Life or in the Media and Expectancies Based on Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[54]  Henry W. Riecken,et al.  Some Determinants and Consequences of the Perception of Social Causality1 , 1955 .

[55]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  Social decisions and fairness change when people’s interests are represented by autonomous agents , 2018, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[56]  Dale T. Miller.  Ego involvement and attributions for success and failure. , 1976 .

[57]  Jessica M. Szczuka,et al.  Do a robot’s social skills and its objection discourage interactants from switching the robot off? , 2018, PloS one.

[58]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Source Orientation in Human-Computer Interaction , 2000, Commun. Res..

[59]  Ning Wang,et al.  Agreeable People Like Agreeable Virtual Humans , 2008, IVA.

[60]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  "Do As I Say, Not As I Do": Challenges in Delegating Decisions to Automated Agents , 2016, AAMAS.

[61]  P A Hancock,et al.  Imposing limits on autonomous systems , 2017, Ergonomics.

[62]  J. Loomis,et al.  Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[63]  Aike C. Horstmann,et al.  Expectations vs. actual behavior of a social robot: An experimental investigation of the effects of a social robot’s interaction skill level and its expected future role on people’s evaluations , 2020, PloS one.

[64]  Sonya S. Kwak,et al.  Are You Embarrassed?: The Impact of Robot Types on Emotional Engagement with a Robot , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[65]  M. Frese,et al.  Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance , 2003 .

[66]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  Media Equation Revisited: Do Users Show Polite Reactions towards an Embodied Agent? , 2009, IVA.

[67]  Edward B. Royzman,et al.  The Preference for Indirect Harm , 2002 .

[68]  Emanuele Neri,et al.  Artificial intelligence: Who is responsible for the diagnosis? , 2020, La radiologia medica.

[69]  H. Kelley.  The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[70]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Can computers be teammates? , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[71]  Jim Blascovich,et al.  A theoretical model of social influence for increasing the utility of collaborative virtual environments , 2002, CVE '02.

[72]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[73]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades , 1981 .

[74]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Investigations on empathy towards humans and robots using fMRI , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[75]  James B. Lemert,et al.  DIMENSIONS FOR EVALUATING THE ACCEPTABILITY OF MESSAGE SOURCES , 1969 .

[76]  Matthias Uhl,et al.  Rage against the machine: Automation in the moral domain , 2018, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics.

[77]  Christopher D. Frith,et al.  Imaging the Intentional Stance in a Competitive Game , 2002, NeuroImage.