Institutional Measures for Supporting OER in Higher Education: An International Case-Based Study

Abstract Open Educational Resources (OER) in higher education cannot be put into practice without considering institutional contexts, which differ not only globally but also within the same country. Each institutional context provides educators with opportunities or limitations where Open Educational Practices (OEP) and OER for teaching and learning are involved. As part of a broader research project, and as a follow-up to national perspectives, an international comparison was conducted, based on institutional cases of nine different higher education systems (Australia, Canada, China, Germany, Japan, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Turkey). Aspects regarding the availability of infrastructure and institutional policies for OER, as well as the existence of measures directed at OER quality assurance and at the promotion of the development and use of OER were covered. The resulting theoretical contribution sheds light on an international comparative view of OER and points towards country-specific trends, as well as differences among institutions. These aspects could provide an impetus for the development of institutional guidelines and measures. In line with international literature on the topic, recommendations are derived to promote/ enhance the use of OER in teaching and learning in higher education at the institutional level.

[1]  Victoria I. Marín,et al.  Faculty perceptions, awareness and use of open educational resources for teaching and learning in higher education: a cross-comparative analysis , 2022, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning.

[2]  Ahmed Tlili,et al.  Disrupted classes, undisrupted learning during COVID-19 outbreak in China: application of open educational practices and resources , 2020, Smart Learning Environments.

[3]  Victoria I. Marín,et al.  A Comparative Study of National Infrastructures for Digital (Open) Educational Resources in Higher Education , 2020, Open Praxis.

[4]  Junhong Xiao Digital transformation in higher education: critiquing the five-year development plans (2016-2020) of 75 Chinese universities , 2019, Distance Education.

[5]  Helen Partridge,et al.  Facilitating Open Access to Information: A Community Approach to Open Education and Open Textbooks , 2019, ASIST.

[6]  Carina Bossu,et al.  Open Educational Practices in Australia: A First-phase National Audit of Higher Education , 2018, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning.

[7]  C. Cronin Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education , 2017 .

[8]  Miho Funamori The Issues Japanese Higher Education Face in the Digital Age—Are Japanese Universities to Blame for the Slow Progress towards an Information-based Society? , 2017 .

[9]  Glenda Cox,et al.  Institutional Culture and OER Policy: How Structure, Culture, and Agency Mediate OER Policy Potential in South African Universities , 2016 .

[10]  A. Murphy Open educational practices in higher education: institutional adoption and challenges , 2013 .

[11]  Nancy Arthur,et al.  Heuristic Inquiry: A Personal Journey of Acculturation and Identity Reconstruction , 2010 .

[12]  R. Foster,et al.  Addressing Epistemologic and Practical Issues in Multimethod Research: A Procedure for Conceptual Triangulation , 1997, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[13]  C. Moustakas,et al.  Heuristic Inquiry , 1985 .