Towards sustainable production: a methodology to assess influences between life cycle phases in tool manufacturing

Abstract Tool manufacturers are facing a range of urgent challenges such as a rising global demand for energy and a shortage of critical resources. Eco-efficient tool manufacturing and efficient tool use are required to overcome these challenges. Modifying a tool’s manufacturing technology chain leads to changes in the ecological efficiency in its manufacturing phase as well as in its use phase. In order to make environmentally benign changes, both life cycle phases must be considered when technology chain modifications are planned. Therefore, a methodology is introduced to support technology planners in modifying technology chains to improve a tool’s ecological efficiency, taking its use phase and its manufacturing phase into account. Individual methodology modules support technology planners in information acquisition and evaluation as well as in assessing the cross life cycle phase influences of the manufacturing phase on the use phase. The methodology is validated using an example from carbide tool manufacturing.

[1]  Fritz Klocke,et al.  Robust technology chain design: considering undesired interactions within the technology chain , 2017, Prod. Eng..

[2]  Athulan Vijayaraghavan,et al.  Evaluating the relationship between use phase environmental impacts and manufacturing process precision , 2011 .

[3]  Sami Kara,et al.  An empirical model for predicting energy consumption of manufacturing processes: a case of turning process , 2011 .

[4]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Hybrid life cycle inventory methods – A review , 2018 .

[5]  Qing Chang,et al.  Analyzing environmental sustainability methods for use earlier in the product lifecycle. , 2018, Journal of cleaner production.

[6]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  From Life Cycle Assessment to Sustainable Production: Status and Perspectives , 2005 .

[7]  Rolf Frischknecht,et al.  Transparency in LCA-a heretical request? , 2004 .

[8]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Green Manufacturing and Sustainable Manufacturing Partnership Title Environmental Analysis of Milling Machine Tool Use in Various Manufacturing Environments , 2022 .

[9]  Konstantinos-Dionysios Bouzakis,et al.  Cutting with coated tools: Coating technologies, characterization methods and performance optimization , 2012 .

[10]  Joseph A. Arsecularatne,et al.  Wear and tool life of tungsten carbide, PCBN and PCD cutting tools , 2006 .

[11]  Yuebin Guo,et al.  Energy consumption in machining: Classification, prediction, and reduction strategy , 2017 .

[12]  Komninos Angelakoglou,et al.  A review of methods contributing to the assessment of the environmental sustainability of industrial systems , 2015 .

[13]  T. Özel,et al.  Effects of cutting edge geometry, workpiece hardness, feed rate and cutting speed on surface roughness and forces in finish turning of hardened AISI H13 steel , 2005 .

[14]  S. Yaldiz,et al.  The effect of tool geometry and cutting speed on main cutting force and tool tip temperature , 2007 .

[15]  Ivana Česáková,et al.  Increasing Cutting Tool Life when Machining Inconel 718 , 2014 .

[16]  Wim Dewulf,et al.  Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life cycle inventory (UPLCI) CO2PE! initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing). Part 2: case studies , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.