Response Adaptive Designs with a Variance‐penalized Criterion

We consider a response adaptive design of clinical trials with a variance-penalized criterion. It is shown that this criterion evaluates the performance of a response adaptive design based on both the number of patients assigned to the better treatment and the power of the statistical test. A new proportion of treatment allocation is proposed and the doubly biased coin procedure is used to target the proposed proportion. Under reasonable assumptions, the proposed design is demonstrated to generate an asymptotic variance of allocation proportions, which is smaller than that of the drop-the-loser design. Simulation comparisons of the proposed design with some existing designs are presented.

[1]  M. Zelen,et al.  Play the Winner Rule and the Controlled Clinical Trial , 1969 .

[2]  L. J. Wei,et al.  The Randomized Play-the-Winner Rule in Medical Trials , 1978 .

[3]  Connie Page,et al.  An adaptive randomized design with application to estimation , 2001 .

[4]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  Asymptotically best response-adaptive randomization procedures , 2006 .

[5]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  Optimality, Variability, Power , 2003 .

[6]  R. Gelber,et al.  Reduction of maternal-infant transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with zidovudine treatment. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 076 Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Feifang Hu,et al.  Asymptotic properties of doubly adaptive biased coin designs for multitreatment clinical trials , 2003 .

[8]  E. J. Collins Finite-horizon variance penalised Markov decision processes , 1997 .

[9]  D. J. White Computational approaches to variance-penalised Markov decision processes , 1992 .

[10]  Lee-Jen Wei,et al.  Play the winner for phase II/III clinical trials. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  Xikui Wang,et al.  Statistical Inference of Adaptive Designs with Binary Responses , 2007 .

[12]  N Stallard,et al.  Optimal Adaptive Designs for Binary Response Trials , 2001, Biometrics.

[13]  Donald A. Berry,et al.  Optimal adaptive randomized designs for clinical trials , 2007 .

[14]  Atanu Biswas,et al.  Bayesian Adaptive Biased‐Coin Designs for Clinical Trials with Normal Responses , 2005, Biometrics.

[15]  Jeffrey R. Eisele The doubly adaptive biased coin design for sequential clinical trials , 1994 .

[16]  B. Efron Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced , 1971 .

[17]  Connie Page,et al.  Variability in Adaptive Designs for Estimation of Success Probabilities , 1998 .

[18]  Anastasia Ivanova,et al.  A play-the-winner-type urn design with reduced variability , 2003 .

[19]  Uttam Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Adaptive Allocation and Failure Saving in Randomised Clinical Trials , 2006, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.