Deciphering the shape and deformation of secondary structures through local conformation analysis

BackgroundProtein deformation has been extensively analysed through global methods based on RMSD, torsion angles and Principal Components Analysis calculations. Here we use a local approach, able to distinguish among the different backbone conformations within loops, α-helices and β-strands, to address the question of secondary structures' shape variation within proteins and deformation at interface upon complexation.ResultsUsing a structural alphabet, we translated the 3 D structures of large sets of protein-protein complexes into sequences of structural letters. The shape of the secondary structures can be assessed by the structural letters that modeled them in the structural sequences. The distribution analysis of the structural letters in the three protein compartments (surface, core and interface) reveals that secondary structures tend to adopt preferential conformations that differ among the compartments. The local description of secondary structures highlights that curved conformations are preferred on the surface while straight ones are preferred in the core. Interfaces display a mixture of local conformations either preferred in core or surface. The analysis of the structural letters transition occurring between protein-bound and unbound conformations shows that the deformation of secondary structure is tightly linked to the compartment preference of the local conformations.ConclusionThe conformation of secondary structures can be further analysed and detailed thanks to a structural alphabet which allows a better description of protein surface, core and interface in terms of secondary structures' shape and deformation. Induced-fit modification tendencies described here should be valuable information to identify and characterize regions under strong structural constraints for functional reasons.

[1]  Anne-Claude Camproux,et al.  Structural deformation upon protein-protein interaction: A structural alphabet approach , 2008, BMC Structural Biology.

[2]  Z. Weng,et al.  Atomic contact vectors in protein‐protein recognition , 2003, Proteins.

[3]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Favorable scaffolds: proteins with different sequence, structure and function may associate in similar ways. , 2005, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[4]  Jun-tao Guo,et al.  Analysis of chameleon sequences and their implications in biological processes , 2007, Proteins.

[5]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  P. Argos An investigation of protein subunit and domain interfaces. , 1988, Protein engineering.

[7]  M. Zacharias,et al.  Accounting for global protein deformability during protein-protein and protein-ligand docking. , 2005, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[8]  D. Koshland Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  J. Janin,et al.  Dissecting protein–protein recognition sites , 2002, Proteins.

[10]  Herbert Edelsbrunner,et al.  Interface surfaces for protein-protein complexes , 2006, J. ACM.

[11]  A M Lesk,et al.  Interior and surface of monomeric proteins. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Yukihiro Ozaki,et al.  FT-IR and Near-Infared FT-Raman Studies of the Secondary Structure of Insulinotropin in the Solid State: α-Helix to β-Sheet Conversion Induced by Phenol and/or by High Shear Force , 1994 .

[13]  Z. Weng,et al.  Protein–protein docking benchmark version 3.0 , 2008, Proteins.

[14]  M. Sternberg,et al.  An analysis of conformational changes on protein-protein association: implications for predictive docking. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[15]  Z. Weng,et al.  Protein–protein docking benchmark 2.0: An update , 2005, Proteins.

[16]  Michael D. Daily,et al.  Local motions in a benchmark of allosteric proteins , 2007, Proteins.

[17]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[18]  R. M. Burnett,et al.  Distribution and complementarity of hydropathy in mutisunit proteins , 1991, Proteins.

[19]  N. Ben-Tal,et al.  Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein–protein interfaces , 2001, Proteins.

[20]  Emily R Jefferson,et al.  Biological units and their effect upon the properties and prediction of protein-protein interactions. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Cyrus Chothia,et al.  Ubiquitin--molecular mechanisms for recognition of different structures. , 2010, Current opinion in structural biology.

[22]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Conformational changes associated with protein-protein interactions. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[23]  S. Kumar,et al.  Geometrical and sequence characteristics of alpha-helices in globular proteins. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[24]  Mengding Qian,et al.  The essential role of the flexible termini in the temperature-responsiveness of the oligomeric state and chaperone-like activity for the polydisperse small heat shock protein IbpB from Escherichia coli. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  Pierre Tufféry,et al.  Improved greedy algorithm for protein structure reconstruction , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[26]  Brigitte Le Roux,et al.  Geometric Data Analysis , 2005 .

[27]  J M Thornton,et al.  Protein-protein interactions: a review of protein dimer structures. , 1995, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[28]  P. Bjorkman,et al.  Crystal structure of the hereditary haemochromatosis protein HFE complexed with transferrin receptor , 2000, Nature.

[29]  B. L. Roux,et al.  Geometric Data Analysis: From Correspondence Analysis to Structured Data Analysis , 2004 .

[30]  Sarah A. Teichmann,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions , 2002, ECCB.

[31]  R. St Charles,et al.  Structure of extracellular tissue factor complexed with factor VIIa inhibited with a BPTI mutant. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Restricted mobility of conserved residues in protein-protein interfaces in molecular simulations. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[33]  J. Thornton,et al.  Conformational changes observed in enzyme crystal structures upon substrate binding. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  J M Thornton,et al.  Conservation helps to identify biologically relevant crystal contacts. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  Somesh D. Sharma,et al.  Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[36]  Herbert Edelsbrunner,et al.  Interface surfaces for protein-protein complexes , 2004, RECOMB.

[37]  A C Camproux,et al.  A hidden markov model derived structural alphabet for proteins. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  Julie C. Mitchell,et al.  An automated decision‐tree approach to predicting protein interaction hot spots , 2007, Proteins.

[39]  Tom L Blundell,et al.  An algorithm for predicting protein–protein interaction sites: Abnormally exposed amino acid residues and secondary structure elements , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[40]  Mainak Guharoy,et al.  Secondary structure based analysis and classification of biological interfaces: identification of binding motifs in protein-protein interactions , 2007, Bioinform..

[41]  Mainak Guharoy,et al.  Conserved residue clusters at protein-protein interfaces and their use in binding site identification , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[42]  Cui Zhanhua,et al.  Protein subunit interfaces: heterodimers versus homodimers , 2005, Bioinformation.

[43]  David L Wild,et al.  Reconstruction and stability of secondary structure elements in the context of protein structure prediction. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[44]  Anne-Claude Camproux,et al.  Mining protein loops using a structural alphabet and statistical exceptionality , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[45]  B. Rost,et al.  Analysing six types of protein-protein interfaces. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  B. Zagrovic,et al.  Conformational selection and induced fit mechanism underlie specificity in noncovalent interactions with ubiquitin , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Joan Teyra,et al.  Characterization of interfacial solvent in protein complexes and contribution of wet spots to the interface description , 2007, Proteins.

[48]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  Character and evolution of protein–protein interfaces , 2005, Physical biology.

[49]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Protein–protein docking benchmark version 4.0 , 2010, Proteins.

[50]  Yanay Ofran,et al.  Large‐scale analysis of secondary structure changes in proteins suggests a role for disorder‐to‐order transitions in nucleotide binding proteins , 2010, Proteins.

[51]  Pinak Chakrabarti,et al.  Peptide segments in protein-protein interfaces , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.

[52]  Mao-Zu Guo,et al.  Prediction of Protein-Protein Interactions from Secondary Structures in Binding Motifs Using the Statistic Method , 2008, 2008 Fourth International Conference on Natural Computation.

[53]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Architectures and functional coverage of protein-protein interfaces. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[54]  Morgan Huse,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Type I TGF β Receptor in Complex with FKBP12 , 1999, Cell.

[55]  A. Bogan,et al.  Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[56]  R. Raz,et al.  ProMate: a structure based prediction program to identify the location of protein-protein binding sites. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[57]  S. Miller The structure of interfaces between subunits of dimeric and tetrameric proteins. , 1989, Protein engineering.

[58]  Z. Weng,et al.  Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  J. Janin,et al.  Dissecting subunit interfaces in homodimeric proteins , 2003, Proteins.

[60]  R. Repaske,et al.  Lysis of gram-negative organisms and the role of versene. , 1958, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[61]  P. Bjorkman,et al.  The transferrin receptor binding site on HFE, the class I MHC-related protein mutated in hereditary hemochromatosis. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[62]  M. Sternberg,et al.  The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[63]  A M Brzozowski,et al.  Structure of human factor VIIa and its implications for the triggering of blood coagulation. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  J Kuriyan,et al.  The TGF beta receptor activation process: an inhibitor- to substrate-binding switch. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[65]  Takeshi Kawabata,et al.  MATRAS: a program for protein 3D structure comparison , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[66]  Anne-Claude Camproux,et al.  Identification of non random motifs in loops using a structural alphabet , 2006, 2006 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Bioinformatics and Computational Biology.

[67]  A C Camproux,et al.  Hidden Markov model-derived structural alphabet for proteins: the learning of protein local shapes captures sequence specificity. , 2005, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[68]  Manju Bansal,et al.  Geometrical and Sequence Characteristics of α-Helices in Globular Proteins , 1998 .

[69]  Vladimir Vacic,et al.  Composition Profiler: a tool for discovery and visualization of amino acid composition differences , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.