Trends and projections from annual forest inventory plots and coarsened exact matching

The coarsened exact matching (CEM) method is used to match annual forest inventory plots awaiting remeasurement with plots that have already been remeasured. This results in a model-free approach for short term inventory projections. CEM has many desirable properties relative to other matching methods and is easy to apply within a SQL database. The combination of short term projections with a 3 or 5 year moving window is suggested for providing trend estimates that include the current year and a few years into the future. The default projection represents business as usual. A method to bias the plot matching to generate desired scenarios is also developed. These ideas and methods are demonstrated with several applications to forest inventory data. Scenarios are generated where increasing future harvest levels are stochastically controlled to demonstrate this capability with operational data.

[1]  Gregory A. Reams,et al.  The Southern Annual Forest Inventory System , 1999 .

[2]  Sharon W. Woudenberg,et al.  The Forest Inventory and Analysis Database: Database Description and Users Manual Version 4.0 for Phase 2 , 2012 .

[3]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[4]  P. Deusen.  Carbon sequestration potential of forest land: Management for products and bioenergy versus preservation , 2010 .

[5]  Francis A. Roesch,et al.  Annual forest inventory estimates based on the moving average , 2002 .

[6]  G. Reams,et al.  The use of multiple imputation in the Southern Annual Forest Inventory System , 2000 .

[7]  Rajeev Dehejia,et al.  Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies , 2002, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[8]  G. King,et al.  Multivariate Matching Methods That Are Monotonic Imbalance Bounding , 2011 .

[9]  William A. Bechtold,et al.  The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program - national sampling design and estimation procedures , 2005 .

[10]  Gary King,et al.  Comparative Effectiveness of Matching Methods for Causal Inference , 2011 .

[11]  R. Astrup,et al.  Empirical harvest models and their use in regional business-as-usual scenarios of timber supply and carbon stock development , 2012 .

[12]  David N. Wear,et al.  Forecasts of county-level land uses under three future scenarios: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment , 2011 .

[13]  R. McRoberts.  Imputatoin and Model-Based Updating Technique for Annual Forest Inventories , 2001 .

[14]  P. Deusen.  Modeling trends with annual survey data , 1999 .

[15]  G. King,et al.  Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching , 2012, Political Analysis.

[16]  P. Deusen,et al.  Annual forest inventory statistical concepts with emphasis on multiple imputation , 1997 .

[17]  D. Rubin.  Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco Litigation , 2001, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.

[18]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .