An imaging-based approach predicts clinical outcomes in prostate cancer through a novel support vector machine classification

Preoperatively predict the probability of Prostate cancer (PCa) biochemical recurrence (BCR) is of definite clinical relevance. The purpose of this study was to develop an imaging-based approach in the prediction of 3-years BCR through a novel support vector machine (SVM) classification. We collected clinicopathologic and MR imaging datasets in 205 patients pathologically confirmed PCa after radical prostatectomy. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to assess the association between MR findings and 3-years BCR, and modeled the imaging variables and follow-up data to predict 3-year PCa BCR using SVM analysis. The performance of SVM was compared with conventional Logistic regression (LR) and D'Amico risk stratification scheme by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) analysis. We found that SVM had significantly higher Az (0.959 vs. 0.886; p = 0.007), sensitivity (93.3% vs. 83.3%; p = 0.025), specificity (91.7% vs. 77.2%; p = 0.009) and accuracy (92.2% vs. 79.0%; p = 0.006) than LR analysis. Performance of popularized D'Amico scheme was effectively improved by adding MRI-derived variables (Az: 0.970 vs. 0.859, p < 0.001; sensitivity: 91.7% vs. 86.7%, p = 0.031; specificity: 94.5% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.001; and accuracy: 93.7% vs. 81.0%, p = 0.007). Additionally, beside pathological Gleason score (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.560, p = 0.008), surgical-T3b (HR = 4.525, p < 0.001) and positive surgical margin (HR = 1.314, p = 0.007), apparent diffusion coefficient (HR = 0.149, p = 0.035) was the only independent imaging predictor of time to PSA failure. Therefore, We concluded that imaging-based approach using SVM was superior to LR analysis in predicting PCa outcome. Adding MR variables improved the performance of D'Amico scheme.

[1]  S B Malkowicz,et al.  Biochemical Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy , External Beam Radiation Therapy , or Interstitial Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer , 2000 .

[2]  B. K. Park,et al.  Prediction of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: initial results , 2011, European Radiology.

[3]  Yu-Dong Zhang,et al.  Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of pathologic Gleason grade of prostate cancer. , 2015, Urologic oncology.

[4]  Vitoantonio Bevilacqua,et al.  Comparison of data-merging methods with SVM attribute selection and classification in breast cancer gene expression , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[5]  Vassilis Poulakis,et al.  Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate specific antigen and Gleason score to predict prostate cancer stage. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[6]  Andrés Larroza,et al.  Support vector machine classification of brain metastasis and radiation necrosis based on texture analysis in MRI , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer. , 2011, Radiology.

[8]  Alan G. Ryder,et al.  Kernel principal component analysis residual diagnosis (KPCARD): An automated method for cosmic ray artifact removal in Raman spectra. , 2016, Analytica chimica acta.

[9]  Aytekin Oto,et al.  Seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: evaluation by using multiparametric endorectal MR imaging. , 2013, Radiology.

[10]  M. Kattan,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy , 2009, BJU international.

[11]  U. Capitanio,et al.  Pelvic/retroperitoneal salvage lymph node dissection for patients treated with radical prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence and nodal recurrence detected by [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography. , 2011, European urology.

[12]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[13]  J. K. Kim,et al.  Prostate cancer detection on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: computer-aided diagnosis versus single perfusion parameter maps. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  [EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer]. , 2011, Actas urologicas espanolas.

[15]  Vassilis Poulakis,et al.  Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2004, European urology.

[16]  Lothar R Schad,et al.  Machine learning in preoperative glioma MRI: Survival associations by perfusion‐based support vector machine outperforms traditional MRI , 2014, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  M. Kattan,et al.  Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  M. Schouten,et al.  Predictive value of MRI in the localization, staging, volume estimation, assessment of aggressiveness, and guidance of radiotherapy and biopsies in prostate cancer , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  Sayan Mukherjee,et al.  Fast Principal-Component Analysis Reveals Convergent Evolution of ADH1B in Europe and East Asia. , 2016, American journal of human genetics.

[20]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images? , 2011, Radiology.

[21]  Yudong Zhang,et al.  Magnetic resonance brain classification by a novel binary particle swarm optimization with mutation and time-varying acceleration coefficients , 2016, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[22]  A. Haese*,et al.  Head-to-head comparison of the three most commonly used preoperative models for prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2010, European urology.

[23]  Jing Zhang,et al.  The Histogram Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) Imaging for Differentiating the Gleason grade of Prostate Cancer , 2015, European Radiology.

[24]  U. Capitanio,et al.  Radical prostatectomy for incidental (stage T1a-T1b) prostate cancer: analysis of predictors for residual disease and biochemical recurrence. , 2008, European urology.

[25]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. , 2014, European urology.

[26]  Oguz Akin,et al.  Transition zone prostate cancer: incremental value of diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging in tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness. , 2013, Radiology.

[27]  F. Montorsi,et al.  Survival following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer: the impact of competing causes of mortality and patient stratification. , 2013, European urology.

[28]  Yousef Mazaheri,et al.  Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness. , 2011, Radiology.

[29]  C. Kim,et al.  Prostate cancer: role of pretreatment multiparametric 3-T MRI in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[30]  J. Babb,et al.  Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales. , 2013, Radiology.

[31]  M. Giger,et al.  Quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue and correlation with Gleason score--a computer-aided diagnosis development study. , 2013, Radiology.

[32]  L. Egevad,et al.  The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[33]  Ze Wang,et al.  Support vector machine learning‐based cerebral blood flow quantification for arterial spin labeling MRI , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[34]  R. Murray,et al.  Individualized prediction of illness course at the first psychotic episode: a support vector machine MRI study , 2011, Psychological Medicine.

[35]  Sung Il Hwang,et al.  Image-based clinical decision support for transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison of multiple logistic regression, artificial neural network, and support vector machine , 2009, European Radiology.

[36]  E. Ars,et al.  Improved prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy by genetic polymorphisms. , 2010, The Journal of urology.