The Importance of Political Context for Understanding Civic Engagement: A Longitudinal Analysis

We contend that political context is important to consider when analyzing social capital and that context has an important but neglected impact on understanding the consequences of civic activity. Our focus is on the influence of rural, local leadership in two Minnesota communities and policies that these elites have developed to bring Internet connectivity to their citizens. One city developed a community electronic network and the other opted for an individualistic, entrepreneurial approach to information technology. Using a quasi-experimental research design and four-wave panel data, we find that elite policy approaches interact with civic activity to predict technology use among citizens, even long after the policies’ initial implementation. In the city with a community network, residents who are integrated into civic life are able to harness these political resources to become more technologically sophisticated.

[1]  D. Green,et al.  The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[2]  R. Dalton,et al.  Germany Transformed: Political Culture and the New Politics , 1981 .

[3]  M. Small.  Culture, Cohorts, and Social Organization Theory: Understanding Local Participation in a Latino Housing Project1 , 2002, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Melinda S. Jackson,et al.  A Tale of Two Towns: Assessing the Role of Political Resources in a Community Electronic Network , 2002 .

[5]  Margaret Levi,et al.  Social and Unsocial Capital: A Review Essay of Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work , 1996 .

[6]  A. Calabrese,et al.  Prospects for electronic democracy in the United States: rethinking communication and social policy , 1996 .

[7]  C. Granger.  Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[8]  Andrea L. Kavanaugh,et al.  The Impact of Community Computer Networks on Social Capital and Community Involvement , 2001 .

[9]  Y. Shao,et al.  Repeated Measures Analyses , 2008 .

[10]  A. Alesina,et al.  Nber Working Paper Series the Determinants of Trust the Determinants of Trust , 2022 .

[11]  Robert H. Anderson,et al.  Universal Access to e‐mail: Feasibility and Societal Implications , 1995 .

[12]  Ronald E. Brown,et al.  Faith and Works: Church-Based Social Capital Resources and African American Political Activisim , 2003 .

[13]  M. Fafchamps,et al.  Empirical studies of social capital: a critical survey , 2003 .

[14]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[15]  R. Kling.  Synergies and Competition Between Life in Cyberspace and Face-to-Face Communities , 1996 .

[16]  Paul R. Yarnold,et al.  Reading and understanding MORE multivariate statistics. , 2000 .

[17]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[18]  Melinda S. Jackson,et al.  Civic Culture Meets the Digital Divide: The Role of Community Electronic Networks , 2002 .

[19]  R. Rohrschneider.  Institutional Learning versus Value Diffusion: The Evolution of Democratic Values among Parliamentarians in Eastern and Western Germany , 1996, The Journal of Politics.

[20]  Dietlind Stolle,et al.  Bowling Together, Bowling Alone: The Development of Generalized Trust in Voluntary Associations , 1998 .

[21]  W. Williams.  Why people don't trust government , 1998 .

[22]  Melissa Marschall,et al.  Institutional Arrangements and the Creation of Social Capital: The Effects of Public School Choice , 1997, American Political Science Review.

[23]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Internet Paradox Revisited , 2002 .

[24]  Doug Schuler,et al.  Community networks: building a new participatory medium , 1994, CACM.

[25]  Donald P. Green,et al.  The Downstream Benefits of Experimentation , 2002, Political Analysis.

[26]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[27]  John L. Sullivan,et al.  The importance of trust and community in developing and maintaining a community electronic network , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[28]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[29]  James William Coleman,et al.  Competition and the Structure of Industrial Society: Reply to Braithwaite , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  R. Rohrschneider.  Report from the Laboratory: The Influence of Institutions on Political Elites' Democratic Values in Germany , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[31]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[32]  Gail C. Murphy,et al.  Experiences with cluster and class testing , 1994, CACM.

[33]  Matthew E. Kahn,et al.  Civic Engagement and Community Heterogeneity: An Economist's Perspective , 2002, Perspectives on Politics.

[34]  Jeffery J. Mondak,et al.  Civic engagement in a post-communist state , 1998 .

[35]  Eric Riedel,et al.  Social Capital and Community Electronic Networks , 2002 .

[36]  H. Anheier,et al.  Between States and Markets the Voluntary Sector in Comparative Perspective , 1992 .

[37]  Marion Fourcade-Gourinchas,et al.  The Structural Contexts of Civic Engagement: Voluntary Association Membership in Comparative Perspective , 2001, American Sociological Review.

[38]  Bo Rothstein,et al.  Making and Breaking Social Capital , 2005 .

[39]  A. Alesina,et al.  Participation in Heterogeneous Communities , 1999 .

[40]  R. Jackman,et al.  A Renaissance of Political Culture , 1996 .

[41]  Sidney Tarrow,et al.  Making Social Science Work Across Space and Time: A Critical Reflection on Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work , 1996, American Political Science Review.

[42]  Dietlind Stolle,et al.  Why Do Bowling and Singing Matter? Group Characteristics, Membership, and Generalized Trust , 1998 .

[43]  Marc J. Hetherington,et al.  The Effect of Political Trust on the Presidential Vote, 1968–96 , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[44]  W. Rahn,et al.  Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital , 1997 .

[45]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  Stephen F. Knack,et al.  Social Capital and the Quality of Government: Evidence from the United States , 1999 .

[47]  K. Weinfurt,et al.  Repeated measures analyses : ANOVA MANOVA, and HLM , 2000 .