Reducing project related uncertainty in the “ fuzzy front end ” of innovation – A comparison of German and Japanese product innovation projects

In this paper, we are going to report on the results of an exploratory piece of research about the typical front-end-related activities in 28 innovation projects carried out by 14 German and 13 Japanese companies to reduce project uncertainty. In all cases we observed a range of activities to reduce project specific risks and revealed differences in the practice of innovation management in both the German and Japanese companies. We interviewed managers of 13 Japanese and 14 German enterprises concerning 14 Japanese and 14 German New Product Development projects. The focus of our research was the so called “fuzzy front end”, activities and typical deliverables in the innovation process which might be affected by front end management practice. Overall, in the case of the German as well as the Japanese projects, the uncertainties affected by the market or technology could successfully be reduced during the “fuzzy front end” and the majority of projects achieved their objectives and efficiency targets. Nevertheless, our study revealed differences in the way such uncertainties were reduced by the companies in Japan and Germany. Generally speaking, the 14 Japanese projects relied on a thorough planning, delegation of front end activities and strict controlling mechanisms to minimize deviations from front end specifications later in the innovation process and hence, achieved efficiency. In contrast, in the majority of the 14 German projects we could neither observe such a formal planning nor such an intensive controlling procedure supported by methods and tools as in the case of the Japanese projects. Instead, the companies in our German sample integrated relevant functions like R&D, marketing, sales, production or customer service from the beginning of the innovation process, usually already during the idea generation phase, to ensure that all critical information and perspectives were taken into consideration right from the beginning, to reduce uncertainties and later deviations as well as enhancing efficiency. Responsibilities were assigned during the fuzzy front end and rarely changed during the implementation of the project.

[1]  M. Montoya-Weiss,et al.  Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products , 1998 .

[2]  R. Verganti.  Leveraging on systemic learning to manage the early phases of product innovation projects , 1997 .

[3]  S. R. Rosenthal,et al.  Integrating the Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development , 1997 .

[4]  Sigvald Harryson,et al.  Improving R&D Performance through Networking – Lessons from Canon and Sony , 2003 .

[5]  R. Cooper,et al.  An Investigation into the New Product Process: Steps, Deficiencies, and Impact , 1986 .

[6]  Linda Rochford,et al.  Generating and screening new products ideas , 1991 .

[7]  E. Mansfield,et al.  Organizational and Strategic Factors Associated with Probabilities of Success in Industrial R & D , 1975 .

[8]  Sanjay Mishra,et al.  Factors affecting new product success: Cross-country comparisons☆ , 1996 .

[9]  Ali E. Akgün,et al.  Innovation Strategies Under Uncertainty: A Contingency Approach for New Product Development , 1998 .

[10]  W. Souder,et al.  New product development success factors in American and British firms , 1999 .

[11]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  The front end of new product development: a Canadian survey , 1997 .

[12]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  What separates Japanese new product winners from losers , 1996 .

[13]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[14]  Ulrich Jürgens,et al.  New product development and production networks : global industrial experience , 2000 .

[15]  F. Johne,et al.  Success Factors in Product Innovation: A Selective Review of the Literature , 1988 .

[16]  L. Dwyer,et al.  Organizational Environment, New Product Process Activities, and Project Outcomes , 1991 .

[17]  Wm. E. Souder,et al.  Analyses of U.S. and Japanese Management Processes Associated with New Product Success and Failure in High and Low Familiarity Markets , 1998 .

[18]  Joo-Hong Park.  Vergleich des Innovationsmanagements deutscher, japanischer und koreanischer Unternehmen : eine empirische Untersuchung am Beispiel der chemischen Industrie , 1996 .

[19]  M. Parry,et al.  A Cross-National Comparative Study of New Product Development Processes: Japan and the United States , 1997 .

[20]  J. Mullins,et al.  New Product Development in Rapidly Changing Markets: An Exploratory Study , 1998 .

[21]  Trevor Sowrey.  The generation of ideas for new products , 1987 .

[22]  John H. Friar,et al.  Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework , 1997 .

[23]  E. Pessemier,et al.  Product Planning And Management Designing And Delivering Value , 1993 .

[24]  Alan Webb,et al.  Project Management for Successful Product Innovation , 2000, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[25]  R. Cooper,et al.  SCREENING NEW PRODUCTS FOR POTENTIAL WINNERS , 1993 .

[26]  Stephen R. Rosenthal,et al.  Towards holistic front ends in new product development , 1998 .

[27]  Horst Geschka,et al.  Creativity Techniques in Product Planning and Development : A View from West Germany : R&D Management , 1983 .

[28]  Dirk Deschoolmeester,et al.  R&D/marketing communication during the fuzzy front-end , 1995 .

[29]  Stephen G. Green,et al.  How Management Can Influence the Generation of Ideas , 1985 .

[30]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  New Products: The Key Factors in Success , 1990 .

[31]  Gerald F. Smith.  Idea‐Generation Techniques: A Formulary of Active Ingredients , 1998 .