Parameters of delay discounting assessment: Number of trials, effort, and sequential effects

Procedural variants in estimating delay discounting (DD) have been shown to yield significant within-subject differences in estimated degree of delay discounting as well as variations in the patterns of choice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of subject control over the number of trials in a delay discounting task, on degree of delay discounting. Participants were assessed with two computerized DD assessments: the full-length method presented participants with a fixed set of 240 trials, and the abbreviated task, where once participants had shown indifference between the immediate and delayed rewards, the remaining trials for that delay value were omitted. While the full-length and abbreviated methods did not differentially affect patterns of choice or estimated delay discounting, the order of presentation (ascending or descending) of immediate rewards produced differences in each measure: rate of delay discounting was significantly lower when estimated with the descending sequence; a larger proportion of area under the discounting curve was concentrated around the indifference point trial with the descending sequence; and a lower correlation was observed between estimates obtained across methods with the descending sequence.

[1]  E. Robles,et al.  Functional parameters of delay discounting assessment tasks: Order of presentation , 2007, Behavioural Processes.

[2]  L Green,et al.  Temporal discounting in choice between delayed rewards: the role of age and income. , 1996, Psychology and aging.

[3]  J. E. Mazur.  An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. , 1987 .

[4]  J. Richards,et al.  Delay discounting and probability discounting as related to cigarette smoking status in adults , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[5]  G. Ainslie.  Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  M. Dixon,et al.  Delay discounting by pathological gamblers. , 2003, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[7]  H. de Wit,et al.  Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure. , 1997, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  B. Reynolds.  The Experiential Discounting Task is sensitive to cigarette-smoking status and correlates with a measure of delay discounting , 2006, Behavioural pharmacology.

[9]  A. Logue,et al.  Adjusting delay to reinforcement: comparing choice in pigeons and humans. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[10]  Samuel M. McClure,et al.  Separate Neural Systems Value Immediate and Delayed Monetary Rewards , 2004, Science.

[11]  R. Vuchinich,et al.  Hyperbolic temporal discounting in social drinkers and problem drinkers. , 1998, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[12]  D. Cross,et al.  Subjective probability and delay. , 1991, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  Matthew W. Johnson,et al.  Moderate drug use and delay discounting: a comparison of heavy, light, and never smokers. , 2007, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[14]  L. Green,et al.  Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. , 2001, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  L. Green,et al.  Delay discounting of cocaine by rhesus monkeys. , 2007, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[16]  Jesse Dallery,et al.  Delay discounting predicts cigarette smoking in a laboratory model of abstinence reinforcement , 2007, Psychopharmacology.

[17]  B. Reynolds.  A review of delay-discounting research with humans: relations to drug use and gambling , 2006, Behavioural pharmacology.

[18]  G. Madden,et al.  Discounting of delayed rewards in opioid-dependent outpatients: exponential or hyperbolic discounting functions? , 1999, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[19]  Schneider,et al.  All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[21]  M. Potenza,et al.  Behavioral impulsivity predicts treatment outcome in a smoking cessation program for adolescent smokers. , 2007, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[23]  L. Epstein,et al.  Comparison between two measures of delay discounting in smokers. , 2003, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[24]  N. Petry,et al.  Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls , 2001, Psychopharmacology.

[25]  Joel Myerson,et al.  Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Discounting Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards , 2002 .

[26]  E. J. Callen.  Context preexposure influences the effectiveness of feedback stimuli in avoidance learning , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[27]  S. M. Alessi,et al.  Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[28]  N. Petry,et al.  Excessive discounting of delayed rewards in substance abusers with gambling problems. , 1999, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[29]  W K Bickel,et al.  Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control participants: drug and monetary rewards. , 1997, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[30]  N. Petry.  Pathological gamblers, with and without substance use disorders, discount delayed rewards at high rates. , 2001, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[31]  Robert B. Penfold,et al.  Laboratory and self-report assessments of impulsive behavior in adolescent daily smokers and nonsmokers. , 2007, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[32]  G. Badger,et al.  Delay discounting predicts postpartum relapse to cigarette smoking among pregnant women. , 2007, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[33]  S. Lane,et al.  Measurement of delay discounting using trial-by-trial consequences , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[34]  W. Bickel,et al.  Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  H. de Wit,et al.  Delay or probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior: effect of alcohol. , 1999, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[36]  W. Bickel,et al.  A comparison of two algorithms in computerized temporal discounting procedures , 2007, Behavioural Processes.

[37]  A. Odum,et al.  Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers , 1999, Psychopharmacology.

[38]  Paul Christiansen,et al.  Delay discounting and the alcohol Stroop in heavy drinking adolescents. , 2007, Addiction.