Gender, Group Composition, and Task Type in Small Task Groups Using Computer-Mediated Communication

[1]  V. Savicki,et al.  Gender and group composition in small task groups using computer-mediated communication , 1996 .

[2]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Gender and Democracy in Computer-Mediated Communication , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[3]  Richard T. Herschel,et al.  The Impact of Varying Gender Composition on Group Brainstorming Performance in a GSS Environment , 1994 .

[4]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Groups, Tasks, and Technology , 1993 .

[6]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Support Systems: New Perspectives , 1992 .

[7]  M. Allen,et al.  Sex differences in self-disclosure: a meta-analysis. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  D. Kirk.  Gender issues in information technology as found in schools: authentic/synthetic/fantastic? , 1992 .

[9]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  Gender and the emergence of leaders : a meta-analysis , 1991 .

[10]  Chuck Kormanski,et al.  Team building patterns of academic groups , 1990 .

[11]  Linda L. Carli.  Gender differences in interaction style and influence. , 1989 .

[12]  A. Mulac,et al.  Male/female language differences and effects in same‐sex and mixed‐sex dyads: The gender‐linked language effect , 1988 .

[13]  M. S. Poole,et al.  Communication and Group Decision-Making , 1986 .

[14]  J. McGrath.  Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[15]  P. Nick Blanchard,et al.  Sex differences in task and social-emotional behavior. , 1982 .

[16]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills , 1975 .