A Generic Framework for the Identification of Parsimonious Rainfall-Runoff Models

A task which is often central to hydrological modelling is the identification of an appropriate model structure and a suitable parameter set for a specific case, i.e. a given set of modelling objectives, catchment characteristics and data. However, this identification process is difficult and will often result in a range of possible models, i.e. different parameter sets within a certain model structure, or different model structures. Two generic rainfall-runoff modelling and Monte Carlo analysis toolboxes have been developed to allow for the implementation and subsequent comparison of spatially lumped, metric and parametric model components in order to identify the model(s) and model structure(s) most suitable for a given application. These toolboxes include the use of multi-objective and novel dynamic approaches to performance and identifiability analysis. This enables a more objective analysis of the level of model complexity that is supported by the data. It also enables the modeller to test whether a given model structure is consistent with underlying assumptions, reducing model structural uncertainty. An application of these approaches to a catchment located in the South of England demonstrates the advantages of a flexible framework, combined with novel approaches to model identification.

[1]  H. L. Penman THE DEPENDENCE OF TRANSPIRATION ON WEATHER AND SOIL CONDITIONS , 1950 .

[2]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods , 2000 .

[3]  K. Beven,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Uncertainty in Runoff Prediction and the Value of Data: An Application of the GLUE Approach , 1996 .

[4]  V. Singh,et al.  Mathematical models of large watershed hydrology , 2002 .

[5]  Neil McIntyre,et al.  Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall‐runoff modelling: dynamic identifiability analysis , 2003 .

[6]  S. Uhlenbrook,et al.  Prediction uncertainty of conceptual rainfall-runoff models caused by problems in identifying model parameters and structure , 1999 .

[7]  P. Young,et al.  Simplicity out of complexity in environmental modelling: Occam's razor revisited. , 1996 .

[8]  R. Spear Eutrophication in peel inlet—II. Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis , 1980 .

[9]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  A framework for development and application of hydrological models , 2001, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.

[10]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[11]  George Kuczera,et al.  Assessment of hydrologic parameter uncertainty and the worth of multiresponse data , 1998 .

[12]  P. R. Johnston,et al.  Parameter optimization for watershed models , 1976 .

[13]  R. J. Moore,et al.  Real-Time Flood Forecasting Systems: Perspectives and Prospects , 1999 .

[14]  Claudio Margottini,et al.  Floods and Landslides: Integrated Risk Assessment , 1999 .

[15]  K. Beven,et al.  Progress and directions in rainfall-runoff modelling , 1993 .

[16]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  A toolkit for the development and application of parsimonious hydrological models. , 2002 .

[17]  A. Jakeman,et al.  How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall‐runoff model? , 1993 .

[18]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information , 1998 .

[19]  George H. Leavesley,et al.  A modular approach to addressing model design, scale, and parameter estimation issues in distributed hydrological modelling , 2002 .

[20]  A. Jakeman,et al.  Development of a simple, catchment-scale, rainfall-evapotranspiration-runoff model , 1998 .

[21]  M. B. Beck,et al.  The identification of conceptual hydrological models for surface water acidification , 1986 .