Toward a synthesis of complex adaptive systems and actor-network theory

In this paper we consider the commensurability of complex adaptive systems theory and actor-network theory to study co-evolutionary dynamics of IS emergence. We argue that the theories are defensible meta-theoretically when deployed from the philosophical position of critical realism. We provide a brief example drawn from a case study into the emergence of the phenomenon of research management at a research-intensive university. The paper concludes by summarising the benefits of this approach.

[1]  John Mingers,et al.  Re-Establishing the Real: Critical Realism and Information Systems , 2004 .

[2]  John Mingers,et al.  Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Bonnie Mae Kaplan,et al.  Information systems research: Relevant theory and informed practice , 2004 .

[4]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Great Quantitative/Qualitative Debate: The Past, Present, and Future of Positivism and Post-Positivism in Information Systems , 2004, Relevant Theory and Informed Practice.

[5]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[6]  Frank Land,et al.  Complexity and information systems , 1999 .

[7]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities , 1999, MIS Q..

[8]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[9]  劉秋菊,et al.  Actor-Network Theory and IS research: current status and future prospects , 2007 .

[10]  J. Law.  A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[11]  Simon M. Kaplan,et al.  Interpreting socio-technical co-evolution: Applying complex adaptive systems to IS engagement , 2006, Inf. Technol. People.

[12]  E. Constant.  Why evolution is a theory about stability: constraint, causation, and ecology in technological change , 2002 .

[13]  Yasmin Merali.  Complexity and Information Systems: the emergent domain , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[14]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work , 1996, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology.

[15]  F. Geels.  From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[16]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[17]  L. V. Valen,et al.  A new evolutionary law , 1973 .

[18]  Ramiro Montealegre,et al.  Trojan actor-networks and swift translation: Bringing actor-network theory to IT project escalation studies , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[19]  Nathalie N. Mitev,et al.  In and out of actor-network theory: a necessary but insufficient journey , 2009, Inf. Technol. People.

[20]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[21]  B. Latour.  On Recalling Ant , 1999 .

[22]  Peter M. Allen,et al.  A co-evolutionary complex systems perspective on information systems , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[23]  Michel Callon,et al.  Actor Network Theory , 2001 .

[24]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Preparing for Research Assessment: Co-evolution and Gamesmanship , 2010 .

[25]  Marc Berg,et al.  Guest editors' introduction: Actor-network theory and information systems. What's so special? , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[26]  Martyn Hammersley.  Ethnography and realism , 2001 .

[27]  A. Bruni,et al.  Reassembling the Social—An Introduction to Actor Network Theory , 2007 .

[28]  G. Bowker,et al.  Out of machine age?: complexity, sociotechnical systems and actor network theory , 2001 .

[29]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .

[30]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[31]  Allen S. Lee.  Thinking about Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems , 2004 .

[32]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[33]  Trevor Hopper,et al.  What does organizational change mean?: Speculations on a taken for granted category , 2001 .

[34]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier , 2000 .

[35]  John Mingers,et al.  Pluralism, Realism, and Truth: The Keys to Knowledge in Information Systems Research , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Syst. Approach.

[36]  Ron Weber,et al.  The Reflexive Researcher , 2003 .

[37]  B. Latour.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 1999 .

[38]  S. M. Kaplan,et al.  Co-evolution in information systems engagement: Exploration, ambiguity and the emergence of order , 2005 .

[39]  R. Boland.  Information System Use as a Hermeneutic Process , 2002 .

[40]  R. Pascale.  Surfing the Edge of Chaos , 2000 .

[41]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Social theory and philosophy for information systems , 2004 .

[42]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[43]  Michel Callon,et al.  On Interests and their Transformation: Enrolment and Counter-Enrolment , 1982 .

[44]  B. Latour.  Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .