Multi‐instrument observation on co‐seismic ionospheric effects after great Tohoku earthquake

In this paper, evidence of quake-excited infrasonic waves is provided first by a multi-instrument observation of Japan's Tohoku earthquake. The observations of co-seismic infrasonic waves are as follows: 1, effects of surface oscillations are observed by local infrasonic detector, and it seems these effects are due to surface oscillation-excited infrasonic waves instead of direct influence of seismic vibration on the detector; 2, these local excited infrasonic waves propagate upwards and correspond to ionospheric disturbances observed by Doppler shift measurements and GPS/TEC; 3, interactions between electron density variation and currents in the ionosphere caused by infrasonic waves manifest as disturbances in the geomagnetic field observed via surface magnetogram; 4, within 4 hours after this strong earthquake, disturbances in the ionosphere related to arrivals of Rayleigh waves were observed by Doppler shift sounding three times over. Two of the arrivals were from epicenter along the minor arc of the great circle (with the second arrival due to a Rayleigh wave propagating completely around the planet) and the other one from the opposite direction. All of these seismo-ionospheric effects observed by HF Doppler shift appear after local arrivals of surface Rayleigh waves, with a time delay of 8-10 min. This is the time required for infrasonic wave to propagate upwards to the ionosphere.

[1]  Jann‐Yenq Liu,et al.  Ionospheric disturbances triggered by the 11 March 2011 M9.0 Tohoku earthquake , 2011 .

[2]  Philippe Lognonné,et al.  Ionospheric remote sensing of the Denali Earthquake Rayleigh surface waves , 2003 .

[3]  A. Furumoto,et al.  Continuous, traveling coupling between seismic waves and the ionosphere evident in May 1968 Japan earthquake data , 1969 .

[4]  H. Kanamori,et al.  Acoustic resonant oscillations between the atmosphere and the solid earth during the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption , 2010 .

[5]  T. Iyemori,et al.  Excitation of 4‐min periodic ionospheric variations following the great Sumatra‐Andaman earthquake in 2004 , 2009 .

[6]  K. Davies,et al.  Ionospheric effects observed around the time of the Alaskan earthquake of March 28, 1964 , 1965 .

[7]  N. Misran,et al.  Ionospheric and geomagnetic disturbances during the 2005 Sumatran earthquakes , 2009 .

[8]  E. L. Afraimovich,et al.  The shock-acoustic waves generated by earthquakes , 2001 .

[9]  Lars Ceranna,et al.  Infrasound associated with 2004–2005 large Sumatra earthquakes and tsunami , 2005 .

[10]  W. Morii,et al.  Low-frequency acoustic-gravity waves from coseismic vertical deformation associated with the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake (Mw=9.2) , 2008 .

[11]  Hao YongQiang,et al.  Responses of the Ionosphere to the Great Sumatra Earthquake and Volcanic Eruption of Pinatubo , 2006 .

[12]  J. Laštovička,et al.  Simultaneous infrasonic, seismic, magnetic and ionospheric observations in an earthquake epicentre , 2010 .

[13]  A. Komjathy,et al.  The 2009 Samoa and 2010 Chile tsunamis as observed in the ionosphere using GPS total electron content , 2011 .

[14]  Rhett Butler,et al.  Global seismographic network records the Great Sumatra‐Andaman earthquake , 2005 .

[15]  T. Maruyama,et al.  Ionospheric disturbances detected by GPS total electron content observation after the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake , 2011 .

[16]  T. Maruyama,et al.  A numerical simulation of ionospheric and atmospheric variations associated with the Sumatra earthquake on December 26, 2004 , 2007 .

[17]  J. Bernard Minster,et al.  GPS detection of ionospheric perturbations following the January 17, 1994, Northridge Earthquake , 1995 .

[18]  Jiankui Shi,et al.  Observational facts in revealing a close relation between acoustic-gravity waves and midlatitude spread F , 2009 .

[19]  Chien-Ping Lee,et al.  Ionospheric GPS total electron content (TEC) disturbances triggered by the 26 December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami , 2006 .

[20]  Hiroshi Munekane,et al.  Detection and modeling of Rayleigh wave induced patterns in the ionosphere , 2011 .

[21]  C. Liu,et al.  Giant ionospheric disturbances excited by the M9.3 Sumatra earthquake of 26 December 2004 , 2006 .

[22]  Vladislav V. Kiryushkin,et al.  Two‐mode long‐distance propagation of coseismic ionosphere disturbances , 2009 .

[23]  Philippe Lognonné,et al.  Acoustic waves generated from seismic surface waves: propagation properties determined from Doppler sounding observations and normal-mode modelling , 2004 .

[24]  Zuo Xiao,et al.  Morphological features of ionospheric response to typhoon , 2007 .

[25]  Toshihiko Iyemori,et al.  Geomagnetic pulsations caused by the Sumatra earthquake on December 26, 2004 , 2005 .