Evaluation of Methods That Locate the Center of the Ankle for Computer-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Accurate alignment of the mechanical axis of the limb is important to the success of a total knee arthroplasty. Although computer-assisted navigation systems can align implants more accurately than traditional mechanical guides, the ideal technique to determine the distal end point of the mechanical axis, the center of the ankle, is unknown. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy, precision, objectivity, and speed of five anatomic methods and two kinematic methods for estimating the ankle center in 11 healthy subjects. Magnetic resonance images were used to characterize the shape of the ankle and establish the true ankle center. The most accurate and precise anatomic method was establishing the midpoint of the most medial and most lateral aspects of the malleoli (4.5 ± 4.1 mm lateral error; 2.7 ± 4.5 mm posterior error). A biaxial model of the ankle (2.0 ± 6.4 mm medial error; 0.3 ± 7.6 mm anterior error) was the most accurate kinematic method. Establishing the midpoint of the most medial and most lateral aspects of the malleoli was an accurate, precise, objective, and fast method for establishing the center of the ankle.

[1]  Bernard Roth,et al.  On the Screw Axes and Other Special Lines Associated With Spatial Displacements of a Rigid Body , 1967 .

[2]  R. Morris,et al.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  W. Breidahl,et al.  Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  Peter Loan,et al.  Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Replacement: Results of an Initial Experience in Thirty-five Patients , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  R P Jakob,et al.  Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  P. Walker,et al.  Prediction of total knee motion using a three-dimensional computer-graphics model. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  J O Galante,et al.  Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  Lung-Wen Tsai,et al.  Design of Dyads with helical, cylindrical, spherical, revolute and prismatic joints , 1972 .

[9]  J. Jenny,et al.  [Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation]. , 2001, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[10]  M. Marcacci,et al.  Evaluation of Accuracy in Ankle Center Location for Tibial Mechanical Axis Identification , 2004, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.

[11]  S David Stulberg,et al.  How accurate is current TKR instrumentation? , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  L. Dorr,et al.  Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  Antony J. Hodgson,et al.  Accuracy and Repeatability of Joint Centre Location in Computer-Assisted Knee Surgery , 1999, MICCAI.

[14]  P Cinquin,et al.  [Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study]. , 2001, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[15]  A. Forbes Least-squares best-fit geometric elements. , 1991 .

[16]  Y. Yoshioka,et al.  Tibial anatomy and functional axes , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[17]  Philippe Cinquin,et al.  Computer-assisted knee surgical total replacement , 1997, CVRMed.

[18]  K A Krackow,et al.  A new technique for determining proper mechanical axis alignment during total knee arthroplasty: progress toward computer-assisted TKA. , 1999, Orthopedics.

[19]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[20]  A. J. van den Bogert,et al.  In vivo determination of the anatomical axes of the ankle joint complex: an optimization approach. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  S. Delp,et al.  Computer assisted knee replacement. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  S. Delp,et al.  Posterior tilting of the tibial component decreases femoral rollback in posterior‐substituting knee replacement: A computer simulation study , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.