The use and nature of grapheme coding during sub-lexical processing and lexical access
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Watching the Word Go by: On the Time-course of Component Processes in Visual Word Recognition , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[2] Colin J Davis,et al. The spatial coding model of visual word identification. , 2010, Psychological review.
[3] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[4] Colin J. Davis,et al. An investigation of the role of grapheme units in word recognition. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[5] A. Lecours,et al. The Role of Sublexical Graphemic Processing in Reading , 2000, Brain and Language.
[6] E. Marinus,et al. Dyslexic and typical-reading children use vowel digraphs as perceptual units in reading , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[7] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction , 2008 .
[8] Manuel Perea,et al. The processing of consonants and vowels during letter identity and letter position assignment in visual-word recognition: An ERP study , 2011, Brain and Language.
[9] Eva Marinus,et al. The Use of Sublexical Clusters in Normal and Dyslexic Readers , 2008 .
[10] Marco Zorzi,et al. A Computational and Empirical Investigation of Graphemes in Reading , 2013, Cogn. Sci..
[11] Marco Zorzi,et al. Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.
[12] Arnaud Rey,et al. A phoneme effect in visual word recognition , 1998, Cognition.
[13] R. Treiman,et al. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology What Can Megastudies Tell Us about the Orthographic Structure of English Words? , 2022 .
[14] Ton Dijkstra,et al. Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[15] M. Coltheart,et al. Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading , 1998 .
[16] Manuel Carreiras,et al. Contrasting effects of token and type syllable frequency in lexical decision , 2008 .
[17] Eva Marinus,et al. Variability in the word-reading performance of dyslexic readers: Effects of letter length, phoneme length and digraph presence , 2010, Cortex.
[18] Jonathan Grainger,et al. A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing , 2011, Front. Psychology.
[19] A. Rey,et al. Syllable onsets are perceptual reading units , 2007, Memory & cognition.
[20] Kevin Diependaele,et al. Fast phonology and the Bimodal Interactive Activation Model , 2010 .
[21] Manuel Perea,et al. The overlap model: a model of letter position coding. , 2008, Psychological review.
[22] Sonia Kandel,et al. Graphemic cohesion effect in reading and writing complex graphemes , 2012 .
[23] M. Carreiras,et al. Do Transposed-Letter Similarity Effects Occur at a Prelexical Phonological Level? , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[24] F. Chetail. The internal structure of chaos: Letter category determines visual word perceptual units , 2012 .
[25] Chris Westbury,et al. The Probability of the Least Likely Non-Length-Controlled Bigram Affects Lexical Decision Reaction Times , 2002, Brain and Language.
[26] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception , 2004 .
[27] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .
[28] J. Ziegler,et al. CDP++.Italian: Modelling Sublexical and Supralexical Inconsistency in a Shallow Orthography , 2014, PloS one.
[29] Manuel Perea,et al. Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency , 2008 .
[30] S. Lupker,et al. Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .
[31] James A. Reggia,et al. Competitive Dynamics in a Dual-route Connectionist Model of Print-to-sound Transformation , 1988, Complex Syst..
[32] Arnaud Rey,et al. Graphemic complexity and multiple print-to-sound associations in visual word recognition , 2005, Memory & cognition.
[33] M Coltheart,et al. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.
[34] Boris New,et al. Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE , 2001 .
[35] J. Grainger,et al. Phonology and Orthography in Visual Word Recognition: Evidence from Masked Non-Word Priming , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[36] Jon Andoni Duñabeitia,et al. The relative position priming effect depends on whether letters are vowels or consonants. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[37] P. Bolger,et al. Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch , 2009 .
[38] Boris New,et al. The time course of consonant and vowel processing during word recognition , 2014 .
[39] Kristi A. Kiyonaga,et al. The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. , 1993, Psychological science.
[40] Manuel Perea,et al. Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect? , 2008 .
[41] Jeffrey S Bowers,et al. Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: evidence from orthographic similarity effects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[42] Arnaud Rey,et al. Graphemes are perceptual reading units , 2000, Cognition.
[43] S. Muncer,et al. Type and token bigram frequencies for two-through nine-letter words and the prediction of anagram difficulty , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.
[44] S. Casalis,et al. Grapheme coding in L2: How do L2 learners process new graphemes? , 2014 .
[45] Marco Zorzi,et al. Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.
[46] Jonathan Grainger,et al. A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[47] E. Marinus,et al. Two distinct parsing stages in nonword reading aloud: Evidence from Russian , 2017, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[48] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .
[49] Jonathan Grainger,et al. A Vision of Reading , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[50] The role of phonology in a letter detection task , 2000, Memory & cognition.
[51] Manuel Perea,et al. ERP correlates of transposed-letter similarity effects: Are consonants processed differently from vowels? , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.
[52] C. Whitney. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[53] R. Peereman,et al. LEXOP: A lexical database providing orthography-phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[54] M. Sigman,et al. Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.7 July 2005 The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2022 .
[55] M. Brysbaert,et al. Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths , 2000, Psychological research.
[56] Manuel Perea,et al. Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique. , 2009, Acta psychologica.