Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM It has been suggested that a precise fit between the implant and the framework cylinder is necessary to ensure a satisfactory long-term clinical outcome. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare the precision of fit between implant abutments and framework cylinders in frameworks fabricated by the Procera system and those fabricated from cast gold-alloy. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 19 frameworks, 14 made with the Procera system (type 1) and 5 made of a cast gold-alloy (type 2), were fabricated. A total of 95 implants, 70 type 1 and 25 type 2 frameworks, were evaluated. Three replicas of the space between the implant abutments and the framework cylinders of the master cast were made for each test specimen. The replicas were cut with a scalpel in 2 axial directions: buccal-lingual and right-left. For the purpose of measurement, a microscope with a precision of +/- 0.5 microm was used at original magnification x30. The Student t test was used to determine whether there were significant differences between the framework designs. RESULTS The buccal-lingual measurements for the type 1 and type 2 frameworks showed mean values of 28.1 microm (SD 9.8) and 42.0 microm (SD 1.8) on the buccal side, respectively, and 25.6 microm (SD 11.2) and 51.6 microm (SD 10.9) on the lingual side, respectively. For the right-left view, the mean measurements were 26.6 microm (SD 8.4) and 49.2 microm (SD 11.4) on the right side, respectively, and 27.4 microm (SD 8.5) and 44.4 microm (SD 6.5) on the left side, respectively. The total mean value for type 1 frameworks was 26.9 microm (SD 9.3); that for type 2 frameworks was 46.8 microm (SD 8.8). CONCLUSION Within the limitations of this experiment, it was demonstrated that the fit of frameworks made with the Procera system was significantly better than that of the frameworks made with cast gold-alloy (P<.01).

[1]  B R Lang,et al.  Measuring fit at the implant prosthodontic interface. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[2]  B R Lang,et al.  Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  T Jemt,et al.  Photogrammetric measurements of implant positions. Description of a technique to determine the fit between implants and superstructures. , 1994, Clinical oral implants research.

[4]  J I Nicholls,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of the casting accuracy of one-piece, osseointegrated implant-retained prostheses. , 1993, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[5]  M. Andersson,et al.  Accuracy of machine milling and spark erosion with a CAD/CAM system. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  T Jemt,et al.  Three-dimensional distortion of gold alloy castings and welded titanium frameworks. Measurements of the precision of fit between completed implant prostheses and the master casts in routine edentulous situations. , 1995, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[7]  T. Jemt,et al.  Accuracy of implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw: analysis of precision of fit between cast gold-alloy frameworks and master casts by means of a three-dimensional photogrammetric technique. , 1995, Clinical oral implants research.

[8]  T Jemt,et al.  Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[9]  T Jemt,et al.  A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  B R Lang,et al.  Fit of implant frameworks fabricated by different techniques. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  M. Andersson,et al.  A 2-year follow-up study of titanium crowns. , 1990, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[12]  T Jemt,et al.  In vivo measurements of precision of fit involving implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[13]  C Bessing,et al.  Loose gold screws frequently occur in full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. , 1994, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  M. Andersson,et al.  Clinical results with titanium crowns fabricated with machine duplication and spark erosion. , 1989, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[15]  B Bergman,et al.  The accuracy of a high-precision digitizer for CAD/CAM of crowns. , 1995, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  S Karlsson,et al.  The fit of Procera titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study. , 1993, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[17]  T Jemt,et al.  Measurements of bone and frame-work deformations induced by misfit of implant superstructures. A pilot study in rabbits. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.