The use and interpretation of the Friedman test in the analysis of ordinal-scale data in repeated measures designs.

The purpose of this paper is to review the use and interpretation of the Friedman two-way analysis of variance by ranks test for ordinal-level data in repeated measurement designs. Physical therapists frequently make three or more repeated measurements of the same individual to compare different treatments, or to assess the effect of a single treatment over time. When the measurements are ordinal-scaled, such as some ratings of functional status and muscle strength, statistical significance may be determined by the Friedman test. We illustrate the use of the Friedman test and a post hoc multiple comparison test with data from 27 subjects whose performance on a lifting task was rated on three occasions by use of an ordinal scale. We discuss the interpretation of ordinal-level data and recommend that therapists understand the limitations a measurement scale imposes on the inferences that can be made from these tests.

[1]  M. Friedman.  The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance , 1937 .

[2]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Problem of $m$ Rankings , 1939 .

[3]  M. Friedman.  A Comparison of Alternative Tests of Significance for the Problem of $m$ Rankings , 1940 .

[4]  F. Wilcoxon.  Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[5]  Frederic M. Lord,et al.  On the Statistical Treatment of Football Numbers. , 1953 .

[6]  G. A. Ferguson,et al.  Statistical analysis in psychology and education , 1960 .

[7]  B. Ashworth.  PRELIMINARY TRIAL OF CARISOPRODOL IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS. , 1964, The Practitioner.

[8]  H. Toutenburg,et al.  Lehmann, E. L., Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks, San Francisco. Holden‐Day, Inc., 1975. 480 S., $ 22.95 . , 1977 .

[9]  J. Gaito.  Measurement scales and statistics: Resurgence of an old misconception. , 1980 .

[10]  Jette Am,et al.  Functional capacity evaluation: an empirical approach. , 1980 .

[11]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Measurement Scales and Statistics: The Misconception Misconceived , 1984 .

[12]  F. Horak,et al.  Assessing the Influence of Sensory Interaction on Balance , 1986 .

[13]  W. Thompson,et al.  Statistical criteria in the interpretation of epidemiologic data. , 1987, American journal of public health.

[14]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[15]  J C Grip,et al.  Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  Don't abandon FAS. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  R Barbeito,et al.  Should level of measurement considerations affect the choice of statistic? , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[18]  M. Sheldon.  Lifting instruction to children in an elementary school. , 1994, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.