Does Teacher Empowerment Affect the Classroom? The Implications of Teacher Empowerment for Instructional Practice and Student Academic Performance

Findings from recent research about the relationship of teacher empowerment to other school reform objectives of interest, such as classroom practices or student academic performance, are mixed. This study investigates teacher empowerment in schools that have at least four years of experience with some form of decentralized or school-based management. Based on the assumption that participation in school decisionmaking can enhance teachers’ commitment, expertise, and, ultimately, student achievement, we hypothesize a positive relationship between empowerment and student performance through the linkages of school organization for instruction and pedagogical quality. The data we use to examine empowerment are drawn from a sample of 24 restructuring elementary, middle, and high schools—8 schools at each grade level. Most of the schools are urban, representing 16 states and 22 school districts. Data sources include teacher surveys, ratings of pedagogical quality, assessments of student academic performance, and case studies based on interviews and observations; the primary method of analysis is hierarchical linear modeling (HLM). The results suggest: (1) Overall, empowerment appears to be an important but not sufficient condition of obtaining real changes in teachers’ ways of working and their instructional practices; (2) The effects of empowerment on classroom practice vary depending on the domain in which teacher influence is focused; (3) Teacher empowerment affects pedagogical quality and student academic performance indirectly through school organization for instruction.

[1]  Karen Seashore Louis,et al.  Professionalism and Community: Perspectives on Reforming Urban Schools, Karen Seashore Louis and Sharon D. Druse. 1995. Corwin Press, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA. 272 pages. ISBN: 0-8039-6252-5 (hc); 0-8039-6253-3 (pb). $49.95 (hc); $24.95(pb , 1995 .

[2]  Richard M. Ingersoll,et al.  Teachers' decision-making power and school conflict , 1996 .

[3]  Jane Hannaway,et al.  Decentralization and school improvement : can we fulfill the promise? , 1994 .

[4]  Sheila Rosenblum,et al.  Stability and Change , 1981, Environment, Development, and Public Policy.

[5]  Milbrey W. McLaughlin,et al.  What Matters Most in Teachers' Workplace Context?. , 1992 .

[6]  Ralph L. Rosnow,et al.  Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis , 1984 .

[7]  Rodney T. Ogawa,et al.  Professional-Patron Influence on Site-Based Governance Councils: A Confounding Case Study , 1988 .

[8]  Stephen W. Raudenbush,et al.  Teaching as a Nonroutine Task: Implications for the Management of Schools , 1993 .

[9]  C. Weiss,et al.  Principals, Shared Decision Making, and School Reform , 1994 .

[10]  M. Berends,et al.  A Description of Restructuring in Nationally Nominated Schools: Legacy of the Iron Cage? , 1994 .

[11]  Linda M. Mcneil.  Contradictions of Control, Part 1: Administrators and Teachers. , 1988 .

[12]  V. Lee.  Understanding High School Restructuring Effects on the Equitable Distribution of Learning in Mathematics and Science. Revised. , 1996 .

[13]  Andrew C. Porter,et al.  External Standards and Good Teaching: The Pros and Cons of Telling Teachers What to Do , 1988 .

[14]  W. Firestone,et al.  Professionalism or Bureaucracy? Redesigning Teaching , 1991 .

[15]  R. A. Cooke,et al.  Participation in Decision Making: A Multidimensional Perspective , 1978 .

[16]  R. Cole.  The Macropolitics of Organizational Change: A Comparative Analysis of the Spread of Small-Group Activities. , 1985 .

[17]  Milbrey W. McLaughlin,et al.  Teachers' work : individuals, colleagues, and contexts , 1993 .

[18]  Sharon F. Conley.  Chapter 6: Review of Research on Teacher Participation in School Decision Making , 1991 .

[19]  J. A. Alutto,et al.  Patterns of Teacher Participation in School System Decision Making , 1973 .

[20]  H. M. Marks,et al.  Student Engagement in the Classrooms of Restructuring Schools. , 1995 .

[21]  H. Levin.  Building School Capacity for Effective Teacher Empowerment: Applications to Elementary Schools with At-Risk Students. , 1991 .

[22]  L. Bolman,et al.  Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership. Jossey-Bass Management Series, Social and Behavioral Science Series, and Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1991 .

[23]  Brian Rowan.  Commitment and Control: Alternative Strategies for the Organizational Design of Schools , 1990 .

[24]  V. Lee,et al.  Collective Responsibility for Learning and Its Effects on Gains in Achievement for Early Secondary School Students , 1996, American Journal of Education.

[25]  Sharon Conley,et al.  Review of Research on Teacher Participation in School Decision Making , 1991 .

[26]  Karen Seashore Louis,et al.  Does Professional Community Affect the Classroom? Teachers' Work and Student Experiences in Restructuring Schools , 1998, American Journal of Education.

[27]  Ann Lieberman,et al.  Building a Professional Culture in Schools. , 1988 .

[28]  Worker Participation and the Politics of Reform , 1987 .

[29]  Peter A. Bamberger,et al.  The Dimensionality of Decision Participation in Educational Organizations: The Value of a Multi-Domain Evaluative Approach , 1990 .

[30]  R. Kanter.  The change masters : innovation and entrepreneurship in the American corporation , 1984 .

[31]  W. Hawley,et al.  Choice and Control in American Education , 1992 .

[32]  E. Bridges.  A Model for Shared Decision Making in the School Principalship , 1967 .

[33]  Karen Seashore Louis,et al.  An Emerging Framework for Analyzing School-Based Professional Community. , 1993 .

[34]  Fred M. Newmann.  Beyond Common Sense in Educational Restructuring , 1993 .

[35]  A. Bryk,et al.  Catholic Schools and the Common Good , 1993 .

[36]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[37]  S. Mohrman,et al.  New Boundaries for School-Based Management: The High Involvement Model , 1994 .

[38]  W. Clune,et al.  School-Based Management. Institutional Variation, Implementation, and Issues for Further Research. CPRE Research Report Series RR-008. , 1988 .

[39]  Carol H. Weiss,et al.  Trouble in Paradise: Teacher Conflicts in Shared Decision Making , 1991 .

[40]  Mark A. Smylie,et al.  Instructional Outcomes of School-Based Participative Decision Making , 1996 .

[41]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Chapter 1: Policy and Practice: The Relations Between Governance and Instruction , 1992 .

[42]  James A. Conway,et al.  The Myth, Mystery, and Mastery of Participative Decision Making in Education , 1984 .

[43]  Teachers, power and school change , 1990 .

[44]  M. King.  Participatory Decision Making. , 1996 .

[45]  J. Little.  The Persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and Initiative in Teachers' Professional Relations , 1990, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[46]  Dianne L. Taylor,et al.  School-Level Effects of Teachers' Participation in Decision Making , 1994 .

[47]  Brian Rowan.  Chapter 7: Commitment and Control: Alternative Strategies for the Organizational Design of Schools , 1990 .

[48]  Karen Seashore Louis,et al.  Teachers’ Professional Community in Restructuring Schools , 1996 .

[49]  Fred M. Newmann,et al.  Authentic Pedagogy and Student Performance , 1996, American Journal of Education.

[50]  Fred M. Newmann.  Authentic Achievement: Restructuring Schools for Intellectual Quality , 1996 .

[51]  Jane L. David,et al.  Can Schools Improve Themselves? A Study of School-Based Improvement Programs. , 1984 .

[52]  S. Rosenblum,et al.  Stability and Change: Innovation in an Educational Context , 1981 .

[53]  Susan Johnson.  Teachers at Work: Achieving Success in Our Schools , 1990 .