Control Localization in Networks of Dynamical Systems Connected via a Weighted Tree

For a network of dynamical systems coupled via an undirected weighted tree, we consider the problem of which system to apply control, in the case when only a single system receives control. We abstract this problem into a study of eigenvalues of a perturbed Laplacian matrix. We show that this eigenvalue problem has a complete solution for arbitrarily large control by showing that the best and the worst places to apply control have well-known characterization in graph theory, thus linking the computational eigenvalue problem with graph-theoretical concepts. Some partial results are proved in the case when the control effort is bounded. In particular, we show that a local maximum in localizing the best place for control is also a global maximum. We conjecture in the bounded control case that the best place to apply control must also necessarily be a characteristic vertex and present evidence from numerical experiments to support this conjecture.

[1]  Alireza Seyedi,et al.  Pinning control for complex networks of linearly coupled oscillators , 2013, 2013 American Control Conference.

[2]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  Pinning control of scale-free dynamical networks , 2002 .

[3]  Wenwu Yu,et al.  On pinning synchronization of complex dynamical networks , 2009, Autom..

[4]  C. Wu Perturbation of coupling matrices and its effect on the synchronizability in arrays of coupled chaotic systems , 2003, nlin/0307052.

[5]  Xiang Li,et al.  Global stabilization of complex networks with digraph topologies via a local pinning algorithm , 2010, Autom..

[6]  Bryan L. Shader,et al.  Characteristic vertices of weighted trees via perron values , 1996 .

[7]  Chai Wah Wu,et al.  Control of Networks of Coupled Dynamical Systems , 2013 .

[8]  C. Wu Synchronization in networks of nonlinear dynamical systems coupled via a directed graph , 2005 .

[9]  Leslie G. Valiant,et al.  Parallelism in Comparison Problems , 1975, SIAM J. Comput..

[10]  Mario di Bernardo,et al.  On QUAD, Lipschitz, and Contracting Vector Fields for Consensus and Synchronization of Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[11]  C. Wu On the relationship between pinning control effectiveness and graph topology in complex networks of dynamical systems. , 2008, Chaos.

[12]  Mario di Bernardo,et al.  Adaptive Pinning Control of Networks of Circuits and Systems in Lur'e Form , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[13]  Tianping Chen,et al.  Pinning Complex Networks by a Single Controller , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[14]  C. D. Meyer,et al.  Generalized inverses of linear transformations , 1979 .

[15]  L. Chua,et al.  Synchronization in an array of linearly coupled dynamical systems , 1995 .

[16]  F. Garofalo,et al.  Pinning-controllability of complex networks , 2007, cond-mat/0701073.

[17]  Guoqiang Hu,et al.  Pinning Synchronization of Directed Networks With Switching Topologies: A Multiple Lyapunov Functions Approach , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[18]  Robert J. Plemmons,et al.  Nonnegative Matrices in the Mathematical Sciences , 1979, Classics in Applied Mathematics.

[19]  Chai Wah Wu,et al.  On control of networks of dynamical systems , 2010, Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[20]  Zhisheng Duan,et al.  Leader-follower consensus of multi-agent systems , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[21]  Ying Wang,et al.  Optimal selection strategy for multi-agent system with single leader , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[22]  J. Gillis,et al.  Matrix Iterative Analysis , 1961 .

[23]  Chai Wah Wu Localization of effective pinning control in complex networks of dynamical systems , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[24]  M. Fiedler A property of eigenvectors of nonnegative symmetric matrices and its application to graph theory , 1975 .