Effect of body roll amplitude and arm rotation speed on propulsion of arm amputee swimmers.

Only a limited amount of research has gone into evaluating the contribution made by the upper arm to the propulsion of elite swimmers with an amputation at elbow level. With assistance of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling, the swimming technique of competitive arm amputee swimmers can be assessed through numerical simulations which test the effect of various parameters on the effectiveness of the swimming propulsion. This numerical study investigates the effect of body roll amplitude and of upper arm rotation speed on the propulsion of an arm amputee swimmer, at different mean swimming speeds. Various test cases are simulated resulting in a thorough analysis of the complex body/fluid interaction with a detailed quantitative assessment of the effect of the variation of each parameter on the arm propulsion. It is found that a body roll movement with an amplitude of 45 degrees enhances greatly the propulsive contribution from the upper arm with an increase of about 70% in the propulsive force compared to the no roll condition. An increase in the angular velocity of the upper arm also leads to a concomitant increase in the propulsive forces produced by the arm. Such results have direct implications for competitive arm amputee front crawl swimmers and for those who coach them. One important message that emerges in this present work is that there exists, for any given swimming speed, a minimum angular velocity at which the upper arm must be rotated to generate effective propulsion. Below this velocity, the upper arm will experience a net resistive drag force which adversely affects swimming performance.

[1]  Arezki Slaouti,et al.  Using reverse engineering and computational fluid dynamics to investigate a lower arm amputee swimmer's performance. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  A. H. Rouard,et al.  Relative contribution of arms and legs in humans to propulsion in 25-m sprint front-crawl swimming , 1999, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[3]  Roger Bartlett,et al.  Contributions of Rotations of the Trunk and Upper Extremity to Hand Velocity During Front Crawl Swimming , 2002 .

[4]  Panagiotis Antoniou,et al.  Estimation of hand forces and propelling efficiency during front crawl swimming with hand paddles. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  A. P. Hollander,et al.  Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming VII , 1996 .

[6]  G de Groot,et al.  Determining propulsive force in front crawl swimming: a comparison of two methods. , 1999, Journal of sports sciences.

[7]  Toshimasa Yanai,et al.  Stroke frequency in front crawl: its mechanical link to the fluid forces required in non-propulsive directions. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  H M Toussaint,et al.  Active drag related to velocity in male and female swimmers. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  David Pease,et al.  The accuracy of computational fluid dynamics analysis of the passive drag of a male swimmer , 2007, Sports biomechanics.

[10]  James G. Hay,et al.  The effect of body roll on hand speed and hand path in front crawl swimming - a simulation study , 1997 .

[11]  James G. Hay,et al.  Body Roll and Handpath in Freestyle Swimming: An Experimental Study , 1993 .

[12]  R. Bartlett,et al.  Estimating propulsive forces in swimming from three-dimensional kinematic data. , 1995, Journal of sports sciences.

[13]  J G Hay,et al.  Flow visualization of competitive swimming techniques: the tufts method. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  James G. Hay,et al.  Body Roll and Handpath in Freestyle Swimming: A Computer Simulation Study , 1993 .

[15]  Toshimasa Yanai,et al.  Buoyancy is the primary source of generating bodyroll in front-crawl swimming. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  P J Beek,et al.  Biomechanics of Competitive Front Crawl Swimming , 1992, Sports medicine.

[17]  Huub M Toussaint,et al.  "Pumped-up propulsion" during front crawl swimming. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.