Pollination networks of oil-flowers: a tiny world within the smallest of all worlds.

1. In the Neotropics, most plants depend on animals for pollination. Solitary bees are the most important vectors, and among them members of the tribe Centridini depend on oil from flowers (mainly Malpighiaceae) to feed their larvae. This specialized relationship within 'the smallest of all worlds' (a whole pollination network) could result in a 'tiny world' different from the whole system. This 'tiny world' would have higher nestedness, shorter path lengths, lower modularity and higher resilience if compared with the whole pollination network. 2. In the present study, we contrasted a network of oil-flowers and their visitors from a Brazilian steppe ('caatinga') to whole pollination networks from all over the world. 3. A network approach was used to measure network structure and, finally, to test fragility. The oil-flower network studied was more nested (NODF = 0.84, N = 0.96) than all of the whole pollination networks studied. Average path lengths in the two-mode network were shorter (one node, both for bee and plant one-mode network projections) and modularity was lower (M = 0.22 and four modules) than in all of the whole pollination networks. Extinctions had no or small effects on the network structure, with an average change in nestedness smaller than 2% in most of the cases studied; and only two species caused coextinctions. The higher the degree of the removed species, the stronger the effect and the higher the probability of a decrease in nestedness. 4. We conclude that the oil-flower subweb is more cohesive and resilient than whole pollination networks. Therefore, the Malpighiaceae have a robust pollination service in the Neotropics. Our findings reinforce the hypothesis that each ecological service is in fact a mosaic of different subservices with a hierarchical structure ('webs within webs').

[1]  Isabel Alves-dos-Santos,et al.  História natural das abelhas coletoras de óleo , 2007 .

[2]  Paulo Guimarães,et al.  Improving the analyses of nestedness for large sets of matrices , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Patterns of Mutualistic Interactions in Pollination and Seed Dispersal: Connectance, Dependence Asymmetries, and Coevolution , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[4]  Wirt Atmar,et al.  The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat , 1993, Oecologia.

[5]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  A neutral‐niche theory of nestedness in mutualistic networks , 2008 .

[7]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Build-up mechanisms determining the topology of mutualistic networks. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance , 2006, Science.

[9]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement , 2008 .

[10]  S. Vogel.  History of the Malpighiaceae in the light of pollination ecology. , 1990 .

[11]  Paulo R. Guimar,et al.  Improving the analyses of nestedness for large sets of matrices , 2006 .

[12]  J. Bernardo,et al.  Simplifying the Jargon of Community Ecology: A Conceptual Approach , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[13]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks , 2007, Nature.

[14]  J. Bascompte,et al.  The modularity of pollination networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Paulo R. Guimarães,et al.  Interaction Intimacy Affects Structure and Coevolutionary Dynamics in Mutualistic Networks , 2007, Current Biology.

[16]  R. Guimerà,et al.  Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks , 2005, Nature.

[17]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  The Structure and Dynamics of Networks: (Princeton Studies in Complexity) , 2006 .

[18]  Kamaljit S. Bawa,et al.  Plant-Pollinator Interactions in Tropical Rain Forests , 1990 .

[19]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Luciano da Fontoura Costa,et al.  Reinforcing the resilience of complex networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  D. Roubik,et al.  Ecology and natural history of tropical bees: Extant families, subfamilies, tribes, genera, and subgenera of the Apoidea: a partial checklist , 1989 .

[22]  T. P. Neufeld,et al.  Direct Induction of Autophagy by Atg1 Inhibits Cell Growth and Induces Apoptotic Cell Death , 2007, Current Biology.

[23]  A. Gomes,et al.  Fitossociologia do componente lenhoso de um refúgio vegetacional no município de Buíque, Pernambuco , 1998 .

[24]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[25]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Program for Large Network Analysis , 1999 .

[26]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity , 2007 .

[27]  Sérgio Furtado dos Reis,et al.  The nested structure of marine cleaning symbiosis: is it like flowers and bees? , 2007, Biology Letters.

[28]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The smallest of all worlds: pollination networks. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.