Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Mechanical Versus Biologic Aortic Valve Prostheses in Older Patients: Results From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery National Database

Background— There is a paucity of long-term data comparing biological versus mechanical aortic valve prostheses in older individuals. Methods and Results— We performed follow-up of patients aged 65 to 80 years undergoing aortic valve replacement with a biological (n=24 410) or mechanical (n=14 789) prosthesis from 1991 to 1999 at 605 centers within the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database using Medicare inpatient claims (mean, 12.6 years; maximum, 17 years; minimum, 8 years), and outcomes were compared by propensity methods. Among Medicare-linked patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (mean age, 73 years), both reoperation (4.0%) and endocarditis (1.9%) were uncommon to 12 years; however, the risk for other adverse outcomes was high, including death (66.5%), stroke (14.1%), and bleeding (17.9%). Compared with those receiving a mechanical valve, patients given a bioprosthesis had a similar adjusted risk for death (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.07), higher risks for reoperation (hazard ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 2.14–3.03) and endocarditis (hazard ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.31–1.94), and lower risks for stroke (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.82–0.93) and bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.62–0.70). Although these results were generally consistent among patient subgroups, bioprosthesis patients aged 65 to 69 years had a substantially elevated 12-year absolute risk of reoperation (10.5%). Conclusions— Among patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, long-term mortality rates were similar for those who received bioprosthetic versus mechanical valves. Bioprostheses were associated with a higher long-term risk of reoperation and endocarditis but a lower risk of stroke and hemorrhage. These risks varied as a function of a patient’s age and comorbidities.

[1]  K. Anstrom,et al.  Characteristics and long-term outcomes of percutaneous revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in the United States: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2004 to 2008. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Susan Armstrong,et al.  Hancock II bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: the gold standard of bioprosthetic valves durability? , 2010, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  Adrian F Hernandez,et al.  Linking inpatient clinical registry data to Medicare claims data using indirect identifiers. , 2009, American heart journal.

[4]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. , 2009, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  Frederick J. Schoen,et al.  Evolving Concepts of Cardiac Valve Dynamics: The Continuum of Development, Functional Structure, Pathobiology, and Tissue Engineering , 2008, Circulation.

[6]  Peter C Austin,et al.  A critical appraisal of propensity‐score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003 , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  J. Mayer,et al.  Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  E. Schelbert,et al.  Valve type and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement in older patients , 2007, Heart.

[9]  H. Birnbaum,et al.  Prevalence, referral patterns, testing, and surgery in aortic valve disease: leaving women and elderly patients behind? , 2007, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[10]  D. Rubin,et al.  Fully conditional specification in multivariate imputation , 2006 .

[11]  Alexander Kulik,et al.  Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients. , 2006, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[12]  Stephen R Cole,et al.  Adjusted survival curves with inverse probability weights , 2004, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[13]  E. Peterson,et al.  Validity of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  Laurence L. George,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 2003, Technometrics.

[15]  D J Wheatley,et al.  Twenty year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses , 2003, Heart.

[16]  S. Rahimtoola,et al.  Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Prosthetic valve type for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: a decision analysis. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[18]  W G Henderson,et al.  Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  D C Naftel,et al.  Long-term performance of heart valve prostheses. , 2000, Current problems in cardiology.

[20]  J. Lowe,et al.  Long-term outcome after biologic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in 841 patients. , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  A Starr,et al.  Actuarial versus actual risk of porcine structural valve deterioration. , 1994, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[22]  E. DeLong,et al.  Discordance of Databases Designed for Claims Payment versus Clinical Information Systems: Implications for Outcomes Research , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  F. Loop,et al.  Primary isolated aortic valve replacement. Early and late results. , 1989, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[24]  L. J. Wei,et al.  The Robust Inference for the Cox Proportional Hazards Model , 1989 .

[25]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[26]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 1980 .

[27]  Norman Breslow,et al.  Discussion of Professor Cox''s paper , 1974 .

[28]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .