Decision support system for inspection and maintenance: a case study of oil pipelines

The existing method of pipeline health monitoring, which requires an entire pipeline to be inspected periodically, is unproductive. A risk-based decision support system (DSS) that reduces the amount of time spent on inspection has been presented. The risk-based DSS uses the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a multiple attribute decision-making technique, to identify the factors that influence failure on specific segments and analyzes their effects by determining probability of occurrence of these risk factors. The severity of failure is determined through consequence analysis. From this, the effect of a failure caused by each risk factor can be established in terms of cost and the cumulative effect of failure is determined through probability analysis. The model optimizes the cost of pipeline operations by reducing subjectivity in selecting a specific inspection method, identifying and prioritizing the right pipeline segment for inspection and maintenance, deriving budget allocation, providing guidance to deploy the right mix labor for inspection and maintenance, planning emergency preparation, and deriving logical insurance plan. The proposed methodology also helps derive inspection and maintenance policy for the entire pipeline system, suggest design, operational philosophy, and construction methodology for new pipelines.

[1]  Prasanta Kumar Dey.  Integrated approach to project feasibility analysis: a case study , 2001 .

[2]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  Petroleum pipeline construction planning: a conceptual framework , 1996 .

[3]  Jonathan Burton,et al.  Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process in Operations Management , 1990 .

[4]  Jim C. P. Liou.  Pipeline Integrity Monitoring Using System Impulse Response , 1996 .

[5]  Luis G. Vargas.  An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications , 1990 .

[6]  Geoff Lockett,et al.  A decision support system using judgmental modeling: a case of R&D in the pharmaceutical industry , 1991 .

[7]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  Decision support system for pipeline route selection , 1999 .

[8]  Mohammad A Mustafa,et al.  Decision support for bid evaluation , 1990 .

[9]  M. Tuominen,et al.  Benchmarking logistics performance with an application of the analytic hierarchy process , 1996 .

[10]  Prasanta Kumar Dey,et al.  Benchmarking project management practices of Caribbean organizations using analytic hierarchy process , 2002 .

[11]  Ernest H. Forman,et al.  Group decision support with the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1992, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Priority setting in complex problems , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[13]  Sarfraz A. Mian,et al.  Decision-Making over the Project Life Cycle: An Analytical Hierarchy Approach , 1999 .

[14]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1989 .

[15]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  Planning for project control through risk analysis: a petroleum pipeline-laying project , 1994 .

[16]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[17]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  Multiple attribute decision making approach to petroleum pipeline route selection , 2001, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag..