Forward prediction based on wafer sort data — A case study

This paper studies the potential of using wafer probe tests to predict the outcome of future tests. The study is carried out using test data based on an SoC design for the automotive market. Given a set of known failing parts, there are two possible approaches to learn. First a single binary classification model can be learned to model all failing parts. We show that this approach can be effective if the failing parts are compatible in learning. Second, an individual outlier model can be learned for each failing part. We show that this approach is suitable for learning failing parts such as customer returns, where each may have a unique failing behavior. We also show that with Principal Component Analysis (PCA), a learning model can be visualized in two or three dimensional PC space, which facilitates an engineer to manually select or adjust the model.

[1]  R. D. Blanton,et al.  Statistical Test Compaction Using Binary Decision Trees , 2006, IEEE Design & Test of Computers.

[2]  Magdy S. Abadir,et al.  Understanding customer returns from a test perspective , 2011, 29th VLSI Test Symposium.

[3]  Chia-Hua Ho,et al.  Active learning strategies using SVMs , 2010, The 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[4]  Kenneth M. Butler,et al.  Quality improvement and cost reduction using statistical outlier methods , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Computer Design.

[5]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[6]  Gustavo E. A. P. A. Batista,et al.  A study of the behavior of several methods for balancing machine learning training data , 2004, SKDD.

[7]  Yanqing Zhang,et al.  SVMs Modeling for Highly Imbalanced Classification , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[8]  Peter M. O'Neill,et al.  Production Multivariate Outlier Detection Using Principal Components , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Test Conference.

[9]  Rohini K. Srihari,et al.  Feature selection for text categorization on imbalanced data , 2004, SKDD.

[10]  W. Robert Daasch,et al.  Statistics in Semiconductor Test: Going beyond Yield , 2009, IEEE Design & Test of Computers.

[11]  George Forman,et al.  An Extensive Empirical Study of Feature Selection Metrics for Text Classification , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[12]  A. Atiya,et al.  Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[13]  N Sumikawa,et al.  Important test selection for screening potential customer returns , 2011, Proceedings of 2011 International Symposium on VLSI Design, Automation and Test.

[14]  W. Robert Daasch,et al.  Burn-in reduction using principal component analysis , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Test, 2005..

[15]  Sule Ozev,et al.  Defect-based test optimization for analog/RF circuits for near-zero DPPM applications , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Computer Design.

[16]  R. D. Blanton,et al.  Reducing Test Execution Cost of Integrated, Heterogeneous Systems Using Continuous Test Data , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[17]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Estimating the Support of a High-Dimensional Distribution , 2001, Neural Computation.

[18]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  Editorial: special issue on learning from imbalanced data sets , 2004, SKDD.

[19]  Yiorgos Makris,et al.  Non-RF to RF Test Correlation Using Learning Machines: A Case Study , 2007, 25th IEEE VLSI Test Symposium (VTS'07).