3D Segmentation of Mammospheres for Localization Studies

Three dimensional cell culture assays have emerged as the basis of an improved model system for evaluating therapeutic agents, molecular probes, and exogenous stimuli. However, there is a gap in robust computational techniques for segmentation of image data that are collected through confocal or deconvolution microscopy. The main issue is the volume of data, overlapping subcellular compartments, and variation in scale and size of subcompartments of interest. A geometric technique has been developed to bound the solution of the problem by first localizing centers of mass for each cell and then partitioning clump of cells along minimal intersecting surfaces. An approximate solution to the center of mass is realized through iterative spatial voting, which is tolerant to variation in shape morphologies and overlapping compartments and is shown to have an excellent noise immunity. These centers of mass are then used to partition a clump of cells along minimal intersecting surfaces that are estimated by Radon transform. Examples on real data and performance of the system over a large population of data are evaluated. Although proposed strategies have been developed and tested on data collected through fluorescence microscopy, they are applicable to other problems in low level vision and medical imaging.

[1]  Qing Yang,et al.  Harmonic cut and regularized centroid transform for localization of subcellular structures , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  D. Pinkel,et al.  Segmentation of confocal microscope images of cell nuclei in thick tissue sections , 1999, Journal of microscopy.

[3]  Damir Sudar,et al.  Automated local bright feature image analysis of nuclear protein distribution identifies changes in tissue phenotype. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Robert F. Murphy,et al.  Automated interpretation of subcellular location patterns , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[5]  Bahram Parvin,et al.  Geometric Approach to Segmentation and Protein Localization in Cell Cultured Assays , 2005, ISVC.

[6]  R. Malladi,et al.  Segmentation of nuclei and cells using membrane related protein markers , 2001, Journal of microscopy.

[7]  Salvatore Lanzavecchia,et al.  Fast computation of 3D radon transform via a direct Fourier method , 1998, Bioinform..

[8]  F. Attneave Symmetry, information, and memory for patterns. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[9]  Alessandro Sarti,et al.  A geometric model for 3-D confocal image analysis , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  M J Bissell,et al.  The importance of the microenvironment in breast cancer progression: recapitulation of mammary tumorigenesis using a unique human mammary epithelial cell model and a three-dimensional culture assay. , 1996, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.

[11]  Bahram Parvin,et al.  BioSig: an imaging bioinformatics system for phenotypic analysis , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[12]  Qing Yang,et al.  Perceptual organization of radial symmetries , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004..

[13]  Baba C. Vemuri,et al.  Shape Modeling with Front Propagation: A Level Set Approach , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..