Diagnostics of the Cochlear Amplifier by Means of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) growth functions reflect the active nonlinear cochlear sound processing when using a primary-tone setting which accounts for the different compressions of the two primaries at the DPOAE generation site and hence provide a measure for objectively assessing cochlear sensitivity and compression. DPOAE thresholds can be derived from extrapolated DPOAE input/output (I/O) functions independently of the noise floor and consequently can serve as a unique measure for reading DPOAE measurements. The thus-estimated DPOAE thresholds exhibit a close correspondence to behavior audiometric thresholds and thus can be used for reconstructing an audiogram, i.e., a DPOAE audiogram. The DPOAE I/O functions’ slope increases with cochlear hearing loss and thus provides a measure for assessing recruitment. Hence, DPOAE I/O functions can give more information for diagnostic purposes than those of DP grams, transiently evoked OAEs (TEOAEs), or auditory brain stem responses (ABRs). DPOAE audiograms can be applied in pediatric audiology to assess cochlear dysfunction in a couple of minutes. In newborn hearing screening, they are able to detect transitory sound-conductive hearing loss and thus can help to reduce the rate of false-positive TEOAE responses in the early postnatal period. Since DPOAE I/O functions are correlated with loudness functions, DPOAEs offer the possibility of basic hearing aid adjustments, especially in infants and children. Extrapolated DPOAE I/O functions provide a tool for a fast automated frequency-specific and quantitative evaluation of hearing loss.

[1]  D T Kemp,et al.  Otoacoustic emission tests in neonatal screening programmes. , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[2]  T. Janssen,et al.  Growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in tinnitus. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  T. Janssen,et al.  Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2 f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  S J Norton,et al.  Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment: Summary and Recommendations , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[6]  Yvonne Sininger,et al.  Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment: Evaluation of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission, Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission, and Auditory Brain Stem Response Test Performance , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[7]  Paul Boege,et al.  Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  P. A. Dorn,et al.  Cochlear compression estimates from measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Hearing Screening in the Newborn Intensive Care Nursery: Comparison of Methods , 1999, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[11]  B. Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions as Objective Screeners for Ototoxicity , 2001 .

[12]  T. Janssen,et al.  The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Annette Klein,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions for hearing threshold estimation and differentiation between middle-ear and cochlear disorders in neonates. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  P. Dallos The active cochlea , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  Thomas Janssen,et al.  Optimal L 1−L 2 primary tone level separation remains independent of test frequency in humans , 2000, Hearing Research.

[17]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in L1,L2 space. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Thomas Janssen,et al.  Similarity in loudness and distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions: implications for an objective hearing aid adjustment. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  M P Gorga,et al.  The use of cumulative distributions to determine critical values and levels of confidence for clinical distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  B. Vohr,et al.  Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment: Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions during the Perinatal Period , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[21]  Tiffany A. Johnson,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  G. Adamopoulos,et al.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions--an approach for monitoring cisplatin induced ototoxicity in children. , 2001, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[23]  Hallowell Davis,et al.  An active process in cochlear mechanics , 1983, Hearing Research.

[24]  P. A. Dorn,et al.  Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.