The CULTURE model as a mediation framework between managerial cognitions and actions: how communities of practice can drive strategic change

The interaction between managerial cognitions and managerial actions plays an important role for an organisation undergoing change. The interpretative processes through which managers enact with environmental and organisational context are crucial for how they act in the change management process. And even if, according to the literature, the interaction between managerial cognitions and managerial actions is most explicit through individual learning, in this paper, we propose an integrated framework baptised the CULTURE Model as the main mediator for explaining the interactions between these two concepts. The CULTURE Model, which is an acronym of Community, Understanding, Language, Trust, Unification, Reflection and Emotions, is built upon the theory of Communities of Practice and advances our understanding of the sharing of managers' knowledge structure in three principal ways. First, it acts as an enabling and motivating mechanism for sharing knowledge structures. Second, it provides a useful illustration for comprehending the interplay between cognition and action. Third, it helps managers to make sound decisions during the progress of change processes. In such processes, actors inevitably participate and share their knowledge structures, experience and practices that may help to define appropriate actions and move forward in the change process. We discuss how the interaction between managerial cognitions and managerial actions within Communities of Practices affects the effectiveness of the change process.

[1]  M. Alvesson Social Indentity And The Problem of Loyalty In Knowledge‐Intensive Companies , 2000 .

[2]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[3]  Liam Fahey,et al.  Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management , 2000 .

[4]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[5]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[6]  Geoff Easton,et al.  Interfirm responses to heterogeneity of demand over time , 1997 .

[7]  James Gleick,et al.  Chaos, Making a New Science , 1987 .

[8]  Klas Eric Soderquist,et al.  Information Systems in Fast Cycle Development: Identifying User Needs in Integrated Automotive Component Development , 2000 .

[9]  J. Dutton,et al.  KEEPING AN EYE ON THE MIRROR : IMAGE AND IDENTITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL ADAPTATION , 2005 .

[10]  Peter Smith Ring,et al.  Processes Facilitating Reliance on Trust in Inter-Organizational Networks , 1997 .

[11]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[12]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Participation in groupware-mediated communities of practice: a socio-political analysis of knowledge working , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[13]  Robert Scott Gassler The Social Life of Information. By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2000, ISBN 0 875 847625. , 2001 .

[14]  A. Meyer Adapting to environmental jolts. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[15]  Eric Abrahamson,et al.  CHAMPIONS OF CHANGE AND STRATEGIC SHIFTS: THE ROLE OF INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL CHANGE ADVOCATES* , 1991 .

[16]  Nandini Rajagopalan,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF STRATEGIC CHANGE: A MULTI-LENS PERSPECTIVE AND INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK , 1997 .

[17]  P. Jackson,et al.  Virtual Working: Social and Organisational Dynamics , 1999 .

[18]  M. Grant,et al.  Communities of practice. , 2020, Health progress.

[19]  J. Walsh Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane , 1995 .

[20]  John P. Kotter The Heart of Change: real life stories how people , 2002 .

[21]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Executives’ Perceptual Filters: What They Notice and How They Make Sense , 1988 .

[22]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Organizational Identity, Image, and Adaptive Instability , 2000 .

[23]  Robert E. Kaplan,et al.  Whatever It Takes: Decision Makers at Work , 1985 .

[24]  K. Langfield-Smith EXPLORING THE NEED FOR A SHARED COGNITIVE MAP , 1992 .

[25]  Niall Hayes,et al.  Boundless and bounded interactions in the knowledge work process: the role of groupware technologies , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[26]  J. Cook,et al.  New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non‐fulfilment , 1980 .

[27]  Q. Huy In praise of middle managers. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[28]  R. H. Connery,et al.  Processes of organization and management , 1948 .

[29]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[30]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Knowledge management technology and the reproduction of knowledge work practices , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[31]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Studying Organizational Change and Development: Challenges for Future Research , 2001 .

[32]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Managerial Response to Changing Environments: Perspectives on Problem Sensing from Social Cognition. , 1982 .

[33]  M. Ebers The Formation of Inter-Organizational Networks , 1997 .

[34]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[35]  W. Burke,et al.  A Causal Model of Organizational Performance and Change , 1992 .

[36]  Daniel H. Kim The Link between individual and organizational learning , 1997 .