Impact of Channel Disturbances on Current Narrowband Power Line Communications and Lessons to Be Learnt for the Future Technologies

The electricity network is a complex communication medium with properties that depend on both the topology of the grid and the usage pattern of the connected devices. These devices generate channel disturbances during normal operation, which need to be overcome by power line communications (PLC) transmission technologies for ensuring communication. This paper analyzes the influence of the channel disturbances on the performance of the physical layer of the main narrowband PLC technologies approved by international communication organisms and currently deployed in Europe: PoweRline Intelligent Metering Evolution (PRIME) 1.3.6, PRIME 1.4 and G3-PLC. The methodology of this paper applies a standardized test method, metrics and a set of representative channel disturbances defined by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). Moreover, noise recordings from field measurements in an environment equipped with distributed energy resources (DER) complete the subset of the types of noise used in the study. This paper develops a replicable, fully automated, and cost optimized test scenario, based on an innovative Virtual PLC Laboratory, which provides a replicable and automated test process, where a wide range of channel disturbances can be accurately replicated, and the performance of the PLC technologies can be compared under the same conditions. The results of this paper provide important conclusions to be applied in the development of future PLC technologies.

[1]  Christoph Nieß,et al.  Measurement Setup for Notch Evaluation of Narrowband PLC Devices , 2017, GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference.

[2]  Itziar Angulo,et al.  Characterization of non-intentional emissions from distributed energy resources up to 500 kHz: A case study in Spain , 2019, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems.

[3]  Pablo Angueira,et al.  Strategies for Power Line Communications Smart Metering Network Deployment , 2014 .

[4]  Math Bollen,et al.  Future work on harmonics - some expert opinions Part II - supraharmonics, standards and measurements , 2014, 2014 16th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP).

[5]  Véronique Moeyaert,et al.  Development, validation and utilization of an ITU-T G.9903 PHY simulator for communication performance evaluation , 2016, 2016 International Symposium on Power Line Communications and its Applications (ISPLC).

[6]  András Mohos,et al.  Emission Measurement of a Solar Park in the Frequency Range of 2 to 150 kHz , 2018, 2018 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC EUROPE).

[7]  Martin Lundmark,et al.  Standards for supraharmonics (2 to 150 kHz) , 2014, IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Magazine.

[8]  Pablo Angueira,et al.  Analysis of the Channel Influence to Power Line Communications Based on ITU-T G.9904 (PRIME) , 2016 .

[9]  Manav R. Bhatnagar,et al.  Maximum likelihood decoding of QPSK signal in power line communications over Nakagami-m additive noise , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and Its Applications (ISPLC).

[10]  Markus Wächter,et al.  Experimental Investigations of Electrical Influences on Power Line Communication Performance in Distribution Grid Applications , 2016 .

[11]  K. Dostert,et al.  Channel phase distortion and its influence on PLC systems , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and Its Applications.

[12]  Nikoleta Andreadou,et al.  Telecommunication Technologies for Smart Grid Projects with Focus on Smart Metering Applications , 2016 .

[13]  Itziar Angulo Pita,et al.  Virtual Power-Line Communications Laboratory for Technology Development and Research , 2018, REV.

[14]  Alberto Sendin,et al.  Field techniques to overcome aggressive noise situations in PLC networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and Its Applications.

[15]  Carlos Rodríguez-Morcillo García,et al.  Replicability analysis of PLC PRIME networks for smart metering applications , 2016 .

[16]  Vishal Kumar,et al.  Comparative study of narrow band PLCs physical layer under AWGN and narrowband interferer , 2015, 2015 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON).

[17]  Lutz Lampe,et al.  Coded narrowband transmission over noisy powerline channels , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and Its Applications.

[18]  Alfredo Sanz,et al.  A physical layer model for G3-PLC networks simulation , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and its Applications (ISPLC).

[19]  Manu Sharma,et al.  Experimental concept definition and validation to overcome CENELEC A band noise with the use of FCC band overlays , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and its Applications (ISPLC).

[20]  Martin Hoch,et al.  Comparison of PLC G3 and PRIME , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and Its Applications.

[21]  Alberto Sendin,et al.  Performance of PLC communications in frequency bands from 150 kHz to 500 kHz , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and its Applications (ISPLC).

[22]  Alberto Sendin,et al.  Strategies for PLC signal injection in electricity distribution grid transformers , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and Its Applications.

[23]  Ranjan K. Mallik,et al.  PLC System Performance With AF Relaying , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[24]  Luis Hernández-Callejo,et al.  Study of Unwanted Emissions in the CENELEC-A Band Generated by Distributed Energy Resources and Their Influence over Narrow Band Power Line Communications , 2016 .

[25]  C. Rodriguez-Morcillo,et al.  PRIME performance under impulsive noise environments , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and Its Applications.

[26]  Il Han Kim,et al.  Performance Analysis and Enhancements of Narrowband OFDM Powerline Communication Systems , 2010, 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications.

[27]  Manav R. Bhatnagar,et al.  Performance Evaluation of PLC Under the Combined Effect of Background and Impulsive Noises , 2015, IEEE Communications Letters.

[28]  Pierre Siohan,et al.  OFDM/OQAM performance analysis under asynchronous impulsive noise , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and Its Applications.

[29]  Javier Matanza,et al.  Performance evaluation of two narrowband PLC systems: PRIME and G3 , 2013, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[30]  Il Han Kim,et al.  Performance results from 100,000+ PRIME smart meters deployment in Spain , 2012, 2012 IEEE Third International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[31]  Radek Fujdiak,et al.  Experimental measurements of noise influence on narrowband Power Line Communication , 2016, 2016 8th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT).

[32]  Sarah Rönnberg,et al.  CIGRE/CIRED C4.24 – power quality in the future grid – first introduction , 2014 .

[33]  Radek Fujdiak,et al.  Performance evaluation of multi-carrier power line communication systems in real condition for smart grid neighborhood area networks , 2017, 2017 9th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT).

[34]  Stephen Robson,et al.  A New Methodology for Network Scale Simulation of Emerging Power Line Communication Standards , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.