Complex System Governance for Acquisition

Abstract : As acquisition processes have become more complex, they appear to no longer be governable by traditional approaches. Missed budgets, delayed deliveries, and expensive canceled systems appear to becoming more prevalent. Numerous investigations have been conducted attempting to elicit the factors that prevented success. Those systems that succeed in terms of usability, budget, and delivery schedule are the rarity and often become case studies themselves as we try to extract the characteristics that differentiate success from failure. A different viewpoint is to look at the acquisition system from the perspective of Complex Systems Governance (CSG). Recent developments in the field of CSG are poised to offer insights into the domain of complex system acquisition. CSG, an emerging field grounded in Management Cybernetics and System Theory, offers a set of nine essential and interrelated functions that enable effective governancewhich includes acquisition. In this paper, after an introduction of our perception of the problem space, we outline the nine essential meta functions and briefly describe the inter-relationships that form a coherent governance scaffold. An exposition of the corresponding CSG reference model is then profiled. We then examine how the meta functions can be applied to acquisition, using the CSG reference model as the framing for an effective governance system. Finally, we offer suggestions and contributions offered by a research thrust in CSG to examine acquisition in a live case setting with implications for the wider acquisition field.

[1]  Charles B. Keating,et al.  Fragility of oil as a critical infrastructure problem , 2014, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructure Prot..

[2]  Joseph M. Bradley,et al.  Systems theory as a foundation for governance of complex systems , 2015, Int. J. Syst. Syst. Eng..

[3]  L. Bertalanffy General system theory : foundations, development, applications , 1977 .

[4]  Paul L. Francis Defense Acquisitions: Zumwalt-Class Destroyer Program Emblematic of Challenges Facing Navy Shipbuilding , 2008 .

[5]  L. Bertalanffy AN OUTLINE OF GENERAL SYSTEM THEORY , 1950, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[6]  M. Bosch Brain Of The Firm The Managerial Cybernetics Of Organization , 2016 .

[7]  Steve Mills,et al.  Cybersecurity Challenges for Program Managers , 2014 .

[8]  David J. Berteau,et al.  Defense Industry Access to Capital Markets: Wall Street and the Pentagon, An Annotated Brief , 2011 .

[9]  Paul L. Francis,et al.  DEFENSE ACQUISITIONS: Cost to Deliver Zumwalt-Class Destroyers Likely to Exceed Budget , 2008 .

[10]  Gregory Sanders,et al.  Cost and Time Overruns for Major Defense Acquisition Programs: An Annotated Brief , 2011 .

[11]  Charles B. Keating,et al.  Governance implications for meeting challenges in the system of systems engineering field , 2014, 2014 9th International Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SOSE).

[12]  Charles B. Keating,et al.  Systems of systems engineering: prospects and challenges for the emerging field , 2011, Int. J. Syst. Syst. Eng..

[13]  Margit Fauser Transnational Migration - A National Security Risk? Securitization of Migration Policies in Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom , 2006 .

[14]  J. R. Beaumont Diagnosing the System for Organizations , 1985 .

[15]  Charles B. Keating,et al.  Complex system governance reference model , 2015, Int. J. Syst. Syst. Eng..

[16]  David Simms,et al.  The Heart of Enterprise , 1980 .

[17]  Ronald T. Kadish,et al.  Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment Report , 2006 .

[18]  Lars Skyttner,et al.  General Systems Theory: Perspectives, Problems, Practice , 2006 .

[19]  Michael Boudreau Acoustic Rapid COTS Insertion: A Case Study in Modular Open Systems Approach for Spiral Development , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on System of Systems Engineering.