Life cycle oriented technology chain optimization: a methodology to identify the influences of tool manufacturing on environmental impacts caused in the tool’s use phase

Limited availability of resources, increasing global energy demand and legal regulations force tool manufacturers to offer ecologically efficient products. Tools cause environmental impacts in every phase of their life cycles—from resource extraction to disposal. Environmental impacts arising during the use phase are highly dependent on the tool characteristics created in the tool’s manufacturing phase. A holistic analysis of the parameters affecting the use phase as well as of the manufacturing technologies used to manufacture the tool is needed in order to minimize the environmental impacts of the use phase. A methodology that supports technology planners to modify technology chains in order to improve a tool’s ecological efficiency under consideration of the influences between lifecycle phases is therefore introduced. The tool is first analyzed to identify its relevant characteristics. Technological influences within the tool’s use phase are then analyzed. The influences of the manufacturing phase on tool characteristics are identified in a third stage. Fourthly, the tool’s environmental impacts caused by the tool characteristics and by the technological influences during the use phase are added. The methodology therefore enables the reduction of a tool’s environmental impacts in selected impact categories by adjusting identified levers in the tool’s manufacturing phase and in its use phase.

[1]  David Dornfeld,et al.  Energy Consumption Characterization and Reduction Strategies for Milling Machine Tool Use , 2011 .

[2]  Ilke Bereketli,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment in Sustainable Manufacturing: A Case Study , 2012 .

[3]  T. Mang,et al.  Industrial Tribology: Tribosystems, Friction, Wear and Surface Engineering, Lubrication , 2011 .

[4]  Werner Degner,et al.  Spanende Formung: Theorie, Berechnung, Richtwerte , 2015 .

[5]  F. Klocke Manufacturing Processes 1 , 2011 .

[6]  Joseph A. Arsecularatne,et al.  Wear and tool life of tungsten carbide, PCBN and PCD cutting tools , 2006 .

[7]  Ekkard Brinksmeier,et al.  Influence of turning parameters on distortion of bearing rings , 2007, Prod. Eng..

[8]  Fritz Klocke,et al.  Technology chain optimization: a systematic approach considering the manufacturing history , 2014, Prod. Eng..

[9]  Guilherme Luz Tortorella,et al.  Implementation of Lean and Green practices: a supplier-oriented assessment method , 2017, Prod. Eng..

[10]  Ivana Česáková,et al.  Increasing Cutting Tool Life when Machining Inconel 718 , 2014 .

[11]  Berend Denkena,et al.  Simulation-based dimensioning of manufacturing process chains , 2011 .

[12]  Jan Rey,et al.  Evaluating the substitution risk of production systems in volatile environments , 2016, Prod. Eng..

[13]  Massimo Delogu,et al.  Parameters Affecting the Sustainability Trade-off between Production and Use Stages in the Automotive Lightweight Design , 2018 .

[14]  Sami Kara,et al.  An empirical model for predicting energy consumption of manufacturing processes: a case of turning process , 2011 .

[15]  Stefan Müller,et al.  Integrated configuration and holistic evaluation of technology chains within process planning , 2007, Prod. Eng..

[16]  Athulan Vijayaraghavan,et al.  Evaluating the relationship between use phase environmental impacts and manufacturing process precision , 2011 .

[17]  Fritz Klocke,et al.  Robust technology chain design: considering undesired interactions within the technology chain , 2017, Prod. Eng..

[18]  S. Yaldiz,et al.  The effect of tool geometry and cutting speed on main cutting force and tool tip temperature , 2007 .

[19]  Jörg Feldhusen,et al.  Enhanced Function Structure Applicability through Adaptive Function Templates , 2014 .

[20]  Michele Germani,et al.  A Method for the Estimation of the Economic and Ecological Sustainability of Production Lines , 2014 .

[21]  T. Özel,et al.  Effects of cutting edge geometry, workpiece hardness, feed rate and cutting speed on surface roughness and forces in finish turning of hardened AISI H13 steel , 2005 .

[22]  Wim Dewulf,et al.  Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life cycle inventory (UPLCI) Part 1: Methodology Description , 2011 .

[23]  Anne Marsden,et al.  International Organization for Standardization , 2014 .

[24]  Fritz Klocke,et al.  Fertigungsverfahren 1: Zerspanung mit geometrisch bestimmter Schneide , 2018 .

[25]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[26]  Yuebin Guo,et al.  Energy consumption in machining: Classification, prediction, and reduction strategy , 2017 .

[27]  George Chryssolouris,et al.  Life Cycle Analysis: Comparison between Different Methods and Optimization Challenges , 2016 .

[28]  Dimitris Mavrikios,et al.  A perspective on manufacturing strategy: Produce more with less , 2008 .

[29]  Sotiris Makris,et al.  The role of simulation in digital manufacturing: applications and outlook , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[30]  Klaus-Dieter Thoben,et al.  Method to describe interdependencies of state characteristics related to distortion , 2012 .

[31]  Wim Dewulf,et al.  Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life cycle inventory (UPLCI) CO2PE! initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing). Part 2: case studies , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[32]  Chih-Hsing Chu,et al.  Review of sustainable product design from life cycle perspectives , 2012, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing.

[33]  Ekkard Brinksmeier,et al.  Capability Profile of Hard Cutting and Grinding Processes , 2005 .