Rapid Pupil-Based Assessment of Glaucomatous Damage

Purpose. To investigate the ability of a technique employing pupillometry and functionally-shaped stimuli to assess loss of visual function due to glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Methods. Pairs of large stimuli, mirror images about the horizontal meridian, were displayed alternately in the upper and lower visual field. Pupil diameter was recorded and analyzed in terms of the “contrast balance” (relative sensitivity to the upper and lower stimuli), and the pupil constriction amplitude to upper and lower stimuli separately. A group of 40 patients with glaucoma was tested twice in a first session, and twice more in a second session, 1 to 3 weeks later. A group of 40 normal subjects was tested with the same protocol. Results. Results for the normal subjects indicated functional symmetry in upper/lower retina, on average. Contrast balance results for the patients with glaucoma differed from normal: half the normal subjects had contrast balance within 0.06 log unit of equality and 80% had contrast balance within 0.1 log unit. Half the patients had contrast balances more than 0.1 log unit from equality. Patient contrast balances were moderately correlated with predictions from perimetric data (r = 0.37, p < 0.00001). Contrast balances correctly classified visual field damage in 28 patients (70%), and response amplitudes correctly classified 24 patients (60%). When contrast balance and response amplitude were combined, receiver operating characteristic area for discriminating glaucoma from normal was 0.83. Conclusions. Pupillary evaluation of retinal asymmetry provides a rapid method for detecting and classifying visual field defects. In this patient population, classification agreed with perimetry in 70% of eyes.

[1]  P LEVATIN,et al.  Pupillary escape in disease of the retina or optic nerve. , 1959, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  R M Burde,et al.  THE PUPIL , 1967, International ophthalmology clinics.

[3]  B. Chauhan,et al.  Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  G. Holder,et al.  Relationship between electrophysiological, psychophysical, and anatomical measurements in glaucoma. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  A Heijl,et al.  Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Automated visual field evaluation. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[6]  William H. Swanson,et al.  Chromatic and achromatic defects in patients with progressing glaucoma , 2001, Vision Research.

[7]  K. N. Ogle,et al.  COMPARISON OF VISUAL AND PUPILLARY LIGHT THRESHOLDS IN PERIPHERY. , 1964, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Residual photosensitivity in mice lacking both rod opsin and cone photoreceptor cyclic nucleotide gated channel 3 α subunit , 2004, Visual Neuroscience.

[9]  H. J. Wyatt,et al.  Variability of visual field measurements is correlated with the gradient of visual sensitivity , 2007, Vision Research.

[10]  Yuko Ohno,et al.  Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[12]  William H Swanson,et al.  Evaluation of a Two-Stage Neural Model of Glaucomatous Defect: An Approach to Reduce Test–Retest Variability , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[13]  D. Berson,et al.  Strange vision: ganglion cells as circadian photoreceptors , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[14]  A. Cowey,et al.  Fibre organization of the monkey's optic tract: I. Segregation of functionally distinct optic axons , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  H. H. Hunt,et al.  Threshold variability using different Goldmann stimulus sizes , 1990, Acta ophthalmologica.

[16]  J Flammer,et al.  Influence of age on the visual fields of normal subjects. , 1986, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  D. Dacey,et al.  Morphology of wide-field, monostratified ganglion cells of the human retina , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Johnson,et al.  Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  G. Lindgren,et al.  Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. , 1987, Archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  B. Chauhan,et al.  Longitudinal changes in the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma , 2005, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[21]  Harry J. Wyatt,et al.  Pupillary evaluation of retinal asymmetry: Development and initial testing of a technique , 2005, Vision Research.

[22]  G. Spaeth,et al.  The effect of stimulus size on the measured threshold values in automated perimetry. , 1990, Ophthalmology.

[23]  R. W. Rodieck,et al.  Survey of the morphology of macaque retinal ganglion cells that project to the pretectum, superior colliculus, and parvicellular laminae of the lateral geniculate nucleus , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  M. Pu,et al.  Melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells are more injury-resistant in a chronic ocular hypertension model. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  M. Zulauf,et al.  Indikationen für Stimulus 3 und 5 in der automatischen Perimetrie : Vorläufige Resultate , 1994 .

[26]  R. Kardon,et al.  Automated pupil perimetry. Pupil field mapping in patients and normal subjects. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[27]  D. Whitaker,et al.  The statistical interpretation of blue-on-yellow visual field loss. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  J Flammer,et al.  Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[29]  Hao Sun,et al.  Linearity Can Account for the Similarity Among Conventional, Frequency-Doubling, and Gabor-Based Perimetric Tests in the Glaucomatous Macula , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[30]  W. Swanson,et al.  A new pattern electroretinogram paradigm evaluated in terms of user friendliness and agreement with perimetry. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[31]  S. Charles,et al.  Pupil motor perimetry. , 1969, American journal of ophthalmology.

[32]  G. Westheimer,et al.  The spatial properties of the human electroretinogram. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  J. Diamond,et al.  Sclerotomy complications following pars plana vitrectomy , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[34]  K. Yau,et al.  Diminished Pupillary Light Reflex at High Irradiances in Melanopsin-Knockout Mice , 2003, Science.

[35]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition , 1987 .

[36]  H. Lüdtke,et al.  Pupil perimetry using M-sequence stimulation technique. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[37]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Melanopsin-expressing ganglion cells in primate retina signal colour and irradiance and project to the LGN , 2005, Nature.

[38]  G. Jaffe,et al.  Age-related changes of the normal visual field. , 1986, Archives of ophthalmology.

[39]  V. Greenstein,et al.  Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials: evidence of a linear relationship. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[40]  Chris A Johnson,et al.  Evaluation of the structure-function relationship in glaucoma. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[41]  R. Kardon,et al.  Comparison of pupil perimetry and visual perimetry in normal eyes: decibel sensitivity and variability. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[42]  B C Chauhan,et al.  Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[43]  Paul H Artes,et al.  Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[44]  T. Yoshitomi,et al.  Comparison of threshold visual perimetry and objective pupil perimetry in clinical patients. , 1999, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[45]  Standard perimetry. , 2003, Ophthalmology clinics of North America.

[46]  A. Cowey,et al.  Retinal ganglion cells that project to the superior colliculus and pretectum in the macaque monkey , 1984, Neuroscience.

[47]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[48]  R. Bourne,et al.  Structure-function relationships using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, optical coherence tomography, and scanning laser polarimetry. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[49]  A. Sommer,et al.  Repeatability of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test in automated perimetry. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[50]  K. Yau,et al.  Melanopsin-Containing Retinal Ganglion Cells: Architecture, Projections, and Intrinsic Photosensitivity , 2002, Science.

[51]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: FORTRAN , 1988 .

[52]  P. Spry,et al.  Senescent Changes of the Normal Visual Field: an Age-Old Problem , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[53]  B. Becker,et al.  The onset and evolution of glaucomatous visual field defects. , 1982, Ophthalmology.

[54]  D B Henson,et al.  Frequency Distribution of Early Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects , 1986, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[55]  M. Biel,et al.  Melanopsin and rod–cone photoreceptive systems account for all major accessory visual functions in mice , 2003, Nature.

[56]  William H Swanson,et al.  Ganglion Cell Loss and Age-Related Visual Loss: A Cortical Pooling Analysis , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[57]  J. Piltz,et al.  Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. , 1990, American journal of ophthalmology.

[58]  A M McKendrick,et al.  Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[59]  G. Krieglstein,et al.  [Computer perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects at different stimulus sizes (author's transl)]. , 1981, Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde.