A Limiting Channel Capacity of Visual Perception: Spreading Attention Divides the Rates of Perceptual Processes

This study investigated effects of divided attention on the temporal processes of perception. During continuous watch periods, observers responded to sudden changes in the color or direction of any one of a set of moving objects. The set size of moving objects was a primary variable. A simple detection task required responses to any display change, and a selective task required responses to a subset of the changes. Detection rates at successive points in time were measured by response time (RT) hazard functions. The principal finding was that increasing the set size divided the detection rates—and these divisive effects were essentially constant over time and over the time-varying influence of the target signals and response tasks. The set size, visual target signal, and response task exerted mutually invariant influence on detection rates at given times, indicating independent joint contributions of parallel component processes. The lawful structure of these effects was measured by RT hazard functions but not by RTs as such. The results generalized the time-invariant divisive effects of set size on visual process rates found by Lappin, Morse, & Seiffert ( Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78 , 2469–2493, 2016 ). These findings suggest that the rate of visual perception has a limiting channel capacity .

[1]  Joseph W. Houpt,et al.  Statistical measures for workload capacity analysis. , 2012, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[2]  Charles W. Eriksen,et al.  Response competition produces a "fast same effect" in same-different judgments. , 1991 .

[3]  C. Eriksen,et al.  An electromyographic examination of response competition , 1985 .

[4]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  The Number and Quality of Representations in Working Memory , 2011, Psychological science.

[5]  J. E. Creighton,et al.  Lectures on human and animal psychology, Trans. from German 2nd ed. , 1894 .

[6]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Uncovering mental processes with factorial experiments , 1984 .

[8]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Frank Tong,et al.  Accounting for Stimulus-Specific Variation in Precision Reveals a Discrete Capacity Limit in Visual Working Memory , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Selectivity in Probabilistic Causality: Where Psychology Runs Into Quantum Physics , 2011, 1110.2388.

[11]  Daniel R. Little,et al.  Systems Factorial Technology: A Theory Driven Methodology for the Identification of Perceptual and Cognitive Mechanisms , 2017 .

[12]  Briana L. Kennedy,et al.  Emotion-induced blindness reflects competition at early and late processing stages: An ERP study , 2014, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[13]  Lauren E. Welbourne,et al.  Humans, but Not Deep Neural Networks, Often Miss Giant Targets in Scenes , 2017, Current Biology.

[14]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Coactivation in the perception of redundant targets. , 1990, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[15]  Ehtibar N Dzhafarov,et al.  Unfalsifiability and mutual translatability of major modeling schemes for choice reaction time. , 2014, Psychological review.

[16]  M. Manosevitz High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , .

[17]  R. Marois,et al.  Distinct Capacity Limits for Attention and Working Memory , 2006, Psychological science.

[18]  Joseph S. Lappin,et al.  The span of apprehension: Form Identification as a function of amount of information displayed , 1970 .

[19]  Adriane E. Seiffert,et al.  Attentional costs in multiple-object tracking , 2008, Cognition.

[20]  James T. Townsend Truth and consequences of ordinal differences in statistical distributions: toward a theory of hierarchical inference. , 1990 .

[21]  James L. McClelland On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[22]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[23]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  The Joint Distribution Criterion and the Distance Tests for Selective Probabilistic Causality , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[24]  R. Hyman Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  R. Marois,et al.  The attentional blink: A review of data and theory , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[26]  J. Townsend,et al.  The serial-parallel dilemma: A case study in a linkage of theory and method , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  J. Townsend,et al.  Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: an investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories , 1995 .

[28]  George A Alvarez,et al.  How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[29]  J. Townsend,et al.  An accuracy-response time capacity assessment function that measures performance against standard parallel predictions. , 2012, Psychological review.

[30]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The Invisible Gorilla Strikes Again , 2013, Psychological science.

[31]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 2004 .

[32]  D. Simons,et al.  Change Blindness Blindness: The Metacognitive Error of Overestimating Change-detection Ability , 2000 .

[33]  G. Woodman,et al.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  L. Fournier,et al.  Multiple-feature discrimination faster than single feature discrimination within the same object? , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[36]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Methods of Modeling Capacity in Simple Processing Systems , 2014 .

[38]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[39]  J T Townsend,et al.  Truth and consequences of ordinal differences in statistical distributions: toward a theory of hierarchical inference. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .

[41]  Z. Pylyshyn Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking: I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities , 2004 .

[42]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[43]  E. Vogel,et al.  Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[45]  Charles Curtis Eriksen,et al.  The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays , 1973 .

[46]  J. Townsend SOME RESULTS CONCERNING THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARALLEL AND SERIAL PROCESSES , 1972 .

[47]  J Miller,et al.  Effects of preliminary perceptual output on neuronal activity of the primary motor cortex. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  J. Townsend Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .

[49]  J. Townsend,et al.  A theory of interactive parallel processing: new capacity measures and predictions for a response time inequality series. , 2004, Psychological review.

[50]  C. Eriksen,et al.  The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems , 1995 .

[51]  Hilda M. Fehd,et al.  Looking at the center of the targets helps multiple object tracking. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[52]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  James T. Townsend,et al.  A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes , 1971 .

[54]  E. Averbach,et al.  Short-term memory in vision , 1961 .

[55]  Kristen Pammer,et al.  Allocating Attention to Detect Motorcycles: The Role of Inattentional Blindness , 2018, Hum. Factors.

[56]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[57]  J. Townsend,et al.  Workload capacity spaces: A unified methodology for response time measures of efficiency as workload is varied , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[58]  F. Donders On the speed of mental processes. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[59]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[60]  Marvin M. Chun,et al.  Attentional rubbernecking: Cognitive control and personality in emotion-induced blindness , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[61]  C. Eriksen,et al.  STORAGE AND DECAY CHARACTERISTICS OF NONATTENDED AUDITORY STIMULI. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[62]  Michael A. Regan,et al.  Driver distraction: A review of the literature , 2003 .

[63]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[64]  E. Dzhafarov Selective influence through conditional independence , 2003 .

[65]  A. Mack Inattentional Blindness , 2003 .

[66]  A. Kirschmann,et al.  Lectures on human and animal psychology. , 2022 .

[67]  J. Lappin,et al.  Selective attention and very short-term recognition memory for nonsense forms. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[68]  Evan M. Palmer,et al.  Signal detection evidence for limited capacity in visual search , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[69]  R. Kay The Analysis of Survival Data , 2012 .

[70]  Daniel T. Levin,et al.  Unseen and Unaware: Implications of Recent Research on Failures of Visual Awareness for Human-Computer Interface Design , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[71]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[72]  Adriane E Seiffert,et al.  The channel capacity of visual awareness divided among multiple moving objects , 2016, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[73]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[74]  Hayden M. Schill,et al.  How did I miss that? Developing mixed hybrid visual search as a ‘model system’ for incidental finding errors in radiology , 2017, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.

[75]  M. Wallace,et al.  Learning to Associate Auditory and Visual Stimuli: Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms , 2015, Brain Topography.

[76]  J. Townsend,et al.  The resurrection of Tweedledum and Tweedledee: Bimodality cannot distinguish serial and parallel processes , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[77]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Grice-representability of response time distribution families , 1993 .

[78]  Jason M. Scimeca,et al.  Tracking Multiple Objects Is Limited Only by Object Spacing, Not by Speed, Time, or Capacity , 2010, Psychological science.

[79]  Daniel J. Simons,et al.  Inattentional blindness , 2007, Scholarpedia.

[80]  J. Townsend,et al.  The McGurk effect: An investigation of attentional capacity employing response times , 2016, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[81]  Annie Tran,et al.  Visual attention is required for multiple object tracking. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[82]  W. R. Garner Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts , 1975 .

[83]  James T. Townsend,et al.  On mimicry among sequential sampling models , 2015 .

[84]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[85]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[86]  J S Lappin,et al.  Attention in the identification of stimuli in complex visual displays. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[87]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The attentional requirements of consciousness , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.