Managing User‐supplier Interactions: Management of R&D Activity

AMT implementation has brought with it many opportunities for those businesses which subscribed to it. It also introduced a large number of problems, many of which were internal to the user organizations themselves, such as lack of senior management commitment, poor planning and lack of employee involvement amongst others. There were also problems external to the users concerned, such as poor supplier relationships. Argues that user‐supplier interactions are at the heart of effective and successful AMT implementation. The vehicle through which such relationships can be established is R&D activity. The more visible the R&D role is, the more encouragement suppliers give in involving their customers, the more positive the diffusion of AMT and its subsequent adoption can be. Concludes by proposing a model of AMT diffusion, based on a prominent role for R&D activity.

[1]  J. Y. Kamin,et al.  Some determinants of cost distributions in the process of technological innovation , 1982 .

[2]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  SAPPHO updated - project SAPPHO phase II , 1993 .

[3]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Project NewProd: Factors in New Product Success , 1980 .

[4]  R. C. Parker The management of innovation , 1982 .

[5]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Composition of R and D Expenditures: Relationship to Size of Firm, Concentration, and Innovative Output , 1981 .

[6]  John E. Ettlie,et al.  Organizational Policy and Innovation Among Suppliers to the Food Processing Sector , 1983 .

[7]  W. Souder,et al.  Managing New Product Innovations , 1987 .

[8]  The Regional Economic Impact of Technological Change , 1985 .

[9]  John A. Czepiel Communications Networks and Innovation in Industrial Communities , 1979 .

[10]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  How Economists See R&D , 1982 .

[11]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Assessment of Technology In Organizations: Closed versus Open Systems Approach , 1979 .

[12]  B. Zirger,et al.  A study of success and failure in product innovation: The case of the U.S. electronics industry , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[13]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  Work, Mobility, and Participation: A Comparative Study of American and Japanese Industry , 1979 .

[14]  Roland W. Schmitt Successful Corporate R&D : Harvard Business Review , 1987 .

[15]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Identifying industrial new product success: Project NewProd , 1979 .

[16]  William D. Perreault,et al.  A Conceptual Paradigm and Approach for the Study of Innovators , 1981 .