Contraindicated use of bevacizumab and toxicity in elderly patients with cancer.

PURPOSE Drugs are approved on the basis of randomized trials conducted in selected populations. However, once approved, these treatments are usually expanded to patients ineligible for the trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS We used the SEER-Medicare database to identify subjects older than 65 years with metastatic breast, lung, and colon cancer, diagnosed between 2004 and 2007 and undergoing follow-up to 2009, who received bevacizumab. We defined a contraindication as having at least two billing claims before bevacizumab for thrombosis, cardiac disease, stroke, hemorrhage, hemoptysis, or GI perforation. We defined toxicity as first development of one of these conditions after therapy. RESULTS Among 16,085 metastatic patients identified, 3,039 (18.9%) received bevacizumab. Receipt of bevacizumab was associated with white race, later year of diagnosis, tumor type, and decreased comorbid conditions. Of patients who received bevacizumab, 1,082 (35.5%) had a contraindication. In multivariate analysis, receipt of bevacizumab with a contraindication was associated with black race (odds ratio [OR] = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.9), increased age, comorbidity, later year of diagnosis, and lower socioeconomic status. Patients with lung (OR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.4) and colon cancer (OR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.9) were more likely to have a contraindication. In the group with no contraindication, 30% had a complication after bevacizumab; black patients were more likely to have a complication than were white patients (OR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.21 to 2.93). CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates widespread use of bevacizumab among patients who had contraindications. Black patients were less likely to receive the drug, but those who did were more likely to have a contraindication. Efforts to understand toxicity and efficacy in populations excluded from clinical trials are needed.

[1]  T. Buchholz,et al.  The use of bevacizumab among women with metastatic breast cancer: A survey on clinical practice and the ongoing controversy , 2012, Cancer.

[2]  Jason D. Wright,et al.  Uptake and economic impact of first-cycle colony-stimulating factor use during adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  P. Musto,et al.  Off-label use of anti-cancer drugs between clinical practice and research: the Italian experience , 2011, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[4]  M. Markman Outcomes when Cancer Treatment is Delivered on, or off, a Clinical Trial: Implications for Generalizability of Study Results , 2011, Oncology.

[5]  W. Al-Refaie,et al.  Cancer Trials Versus the Real World in the United States , 2011, Annals of surgery.

[6]  Jason D. Wright,et al.  Physician characteristics and variability of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use among Medicare patients with cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  C. Mullins,et al.  Uncertainty in assessing value of oncology treatments. , 2010, The oncologist.

[8]  David Dai,et al.  Contraindicated medication use in dialysis patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, JAMA.

[9]  A. Neugut,et al.  Patterns of use and risks associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents among Medicare patients with cancer. , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  E. Winer,et al.  Racial Differences in Definitive Breast Cancer Therapy in Older Women: Are They Explained by the Hospitals where Patients Undergo Surgery? , 2009, Medical care.

[11]  A. Garden,et al.  Cerebrovascular disease risk in older head and neck cancer patients after radiotherapy. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  A. Jirillo,et al.  Bevacizumab in advanced cancer, too much or too little? , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[13]  E. Perez,et al.  Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Xianglin L. Du,et al.  Racial disparities and socioeconomic status in association with survival in a large population‐based cohort of elderly patients with colon cancer , 2007, Cancer.

[15]  P. Catalano,et al.  Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3200. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Robert Gray,et al.  Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  A James O'Malley,et al.  Frequency and cost of chemotherapy-related serious adverse effects in a population sample of women with breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  J. Goodwin,et al.  Late gastrointestinal toxicity after radiation for prostate cancer , 2006, Cancer.

[19]  C. Gotay Increasing trial generalizability. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  C Michael Stein,et al.  Reform of drug regulation--beyond an independent drug-safety board. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  J. Berlin,et al.  Bevacizumab in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin: an active regimen for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. , 2004, JAMA.

[23]  J. Berlin,et al.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  N. Ferrara,et al.  The biology of VEGF and its receptors , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[25]  Colin B Begg,et al.  Measuring Complications of Cancer Treatment Using the SEER-Medicare Data , 2002, Medical care.

[26]  Deborah Schrag,et al.  Overview of the SEER-Medicare Data: Content, Research Applications, and Generalizability to the United States Elderly Population , 2002, Medical care.

[27]  J L Warren,et al.  Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[28]  L. Kessler,et al.  Potential for Cancer Related Health Services Research Using a Linked Medicare‐Tumor Registry Database , 1993, Medical care.

[29]  Yulei He,et al.  The association of race/ethnicity, insurance status, and socioeconomic factors with breast cancer care , 2011, Cancer.

[30]  J. Crowley,et al.  Impact of the year 2000 Medicare policy change on older patient enrollment to cancer clinical trials. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  Assessing illness severity: does clinical judgment work? , 1986, Journal of chronic diseases.