Interrater Reliability of NI-RADS on Posttreatment PET/Contrast-enhanced CT Scans in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Purpose To evaluate the interrater reliability among radiologists examining posttreatment head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) fluorodeoxyglucose PET/contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans using Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS). Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, images in 80 patients with HNSCC who underwent posttreatment surveillance PET/CECT and immediate prior comparison CECT or PET/CECT (from June 2014 to July 2016) were uploaded to the American College of Radiology's cloud-based website, Cortex. Eight radiologists from seven institutions with variable NI-RADS experience independently evaluated each case and assigned an appropriate prose description and NI-RADS category for the primary site and the neck site. Five of these individuals were experienced readers (> 5 years of experience), and three were novices (< 5 years of experience). In total, 640 lexicon-based and NI-RADS categories were assigned to lesions among the 80 included patients by the eight radiologists. Light generalization of Cohen κ for interrater reliability was performed. Results Of the 80 included patients (mean age, 63 years ± 10 [standard deviation]), there were 58 men (73%); 60 patients had stage IV HNSCC (75%), and the most common tumor location was oropharynx (n = 32; 40%). Light κ for lexicon was 0.30 (95% CI: 0.23, 0.36) at the primary site and 0.31 (95% CI: 0.24, 0.37) at the neck site. Light κ for NI-RADS category was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.63) at the primary site and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.69) at the neck site. Percent agreement between lexicon and correlative NI-RADS category was 84.4% (540 of 640) at the primary site and 92.6% (593 of 640) at the neck site. There was no significant difference in interobserver agreement among the experienced versus novice raters. Conclusion Moderate agreement was achieved among eight radiologists using NI-RADS at posttreatment HNSCC surveillance imaging. Keywords: CT, PET/CT, Head/Neck, Neck, Neoplasms-Primary, Observer Performance Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.

[1]  X. Wu,et al.  Posttreatment Imaging in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer without Clinical Evidence of Recurrence: Should Surveillance Imaging Extend Beyond 6 Months? , 2020, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[2]  A. Juliano,et al.  Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System: Principles and Implementation. , 2020, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[3]  D. Heron,et al.  Positive Predictive Value of Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System Categories 3 and 4 Posttreatment FDG-PET/CT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2020, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[4]  H. Bauknecht,et al.  Inter- and Intrareader Agreement of NI-RADS in the Interpretation of Surveillance Contrast-Enhanced CT after Treatment of Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2020, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[5]  A. Juliano,et al.  NI‐RADS for head and neck cancer surveillance imaging: What, why, and how , 2019, Cancer cytopathology.

[6]  P. Hudgins,et al.  Predictive Value of First Posttreatment Imaging Using Standardized Reporting in Head and Neck Cancer , 2019, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[7]  D. Heron,et al.  Negative Predictive Value of NI-RADS Category 2 in the First Posttreatment FDG-PET/CT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2018, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[8]  R. Wiggins,et al.  ACR Neck Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (NI-RADS): A White Paper of the ACR NI-RADS Committee. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[9]  P. Hudgins,et al.  Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System. , 2018, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[10]  P. Hudgins,et al.  Initial Performance of NI-RADS to Predict Residual or Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2017, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[11]  Daniel R Elgort,et al.  Variability in diagnostic error rates of 10 MRI centers performing lumbar spine MRI examinations on the same patient within a 3-week period. , 2017, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[12]  Seungwon Kim,et al.  Optimal timing of first posttreatment FDG PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma , 2016, Head & neck.

[13]  S. Sheikhbahaei,et al.  FDG PET/CT in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Primary Surgical Resection With or Without Chemoradiation Therapy. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  K. Gwet Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters , 2014 .

[15]  J. Gaughan,et al.  Predictive accuracy of first post‐treatment PET/CT in HPV‐related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma , 2014, The Laryngoscope.

[16]  D. Heron,et al.  Negative Predictive Value of Surveillance PET/CT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[17]  M. Kaplan,et al.  Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography surveillance at 12 and 24 months for detecting head and neck cancer recurrence , 2013, Cancer.

[18]  M. Nakahira,et al.  Posttreatment CT and MR imaging in head and neck cancer: what the radiologist needs to know. , 2012, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[19]  S. Larson,et al.  Clinical Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Assessing the Neck After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locoregional Advanced Head and Neck Cancer , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  A. Viera,et al.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. , 2005, Family medicine.

[21]  A. A. Afifi,et al.  Sample size determinations for the two rater kappa statistic , 1988 .

[22]  W. Willett,et al.  Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic. , 1987, American journal of epidemiology.

[23]  A. J. Conger Integration and generalization of kappas for multiple raters. , 1980 .

[24]  R. Light Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: Some generalizations and alternatives. , 1971 .

[25]  정기동,et al.  Recurrence , 1946, Definitions.

[26]  S. Taylor Head and neck cancer. , 1991, Cancer chemotherapy and biological response modifiers.