The Rise of 3D in Maritime Archaeology

This chapter provides an overview of the rise of 3D technologies in the practice of maritime archaeology and sets the scene for the following chapters in this volume. Evidence is presented for a paradigm shift in the discipline from 2D to 3D recording and interpretation techniques which becomes particularly evident in publications from 2009. This is due to the emergence or improvement of a suite of sonar, laser, optical and other sensor-based technologies capable of capturing terrestrial, intertidal, seabed and sub-seabed sediments in 3D and in high resolution. The general increase in available computing power and convergence between technologies such as Geographic Information Systems and 3D modelling software have catalysed this process. As a result, a wide variety of new analytical approaches have begun to develop within maritime archaeology. These approaches, rather than the sensor technologies themselves, are of most interest to the maritime archaeologist and provide the core content for this volume. We conclude our discussion with a brief consideration of key issues such as survey standards, digital archiving and future directions.

[1]  Annalisa Pietrobelli,et al.  Review of: Fabio Remondino and Stefano Campana. eds. 2014. “3D Recording and Modelling in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage: Theory and best practices”. BAR International Series 2598. Oxford: BAR , 2017 .

[2]  Oscar Pizarro,et al.  High‐Resolution Underwater Robotic Vision‐Based Mapping and Three‐Dimensional Reconstruction for Archaeology , 2017, J. Field Robotics.

[3]  Andrew Wetherelt,et al.  From Boatyard to Museum: 3D laser scanning and digital modelling of the Qatar Museums watercraft collection, Doha, Qatar , 2018 .

[4]  Niklas Eriksson,et al.  Mars (1564): the initial archaeological investigations of a great 16th‐century Swedish warship , 2017 .

[5]  Roberto Scopigno,et al.  Web-based visualization for 3D data in archaeology: The ADS 3D viewer , 2016 .

[6]  John McCarthy,et al.  Multi-image photogrammetry as a practical tool for cultural heritage survey and community engagement , 2014 .

[7]  Chris Rowland,et al.  Photogrammetry in Depth: Revealing HMS Hampshire , 2017, EVA.

[8]  Justin K. Dix,et al.  The Mary Rose site–geophysical evidence for palaeo‐scour marks , 1997 .

[9]  Joe Flatman,et al.  The Origins and Ethics of Maritime Archaeology – Part I , 2007 .

[10]  Rory Quinn,et al.  Processes and patterns of flow, erosion, and deposition at shipwreck sites: a computational fluid dynamic simulation , 2018, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.

[11]  Vincent Gaffney,et al.  A Civil War Gunboat in Pacific Waters: life on board USS Saginaw– By Hans Konrad Van Tilburg , 2007 .

[12]  Jeremy Huggett,et al.  The apparatus of digital archaeology , 2017 .

[13]  Sarah Kenderdine.  Sailing on the Silicon Sea - The Design of a Virtual Maritime Museum , 1998, Arch. Mus. Informatics.

[14]  C. Briese,et al.  AIRBORNE LASER BATHYMETRY FOR DOCUMENTATION OF SUBMERGED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IN SHALLOW WATER , 2015 .

[15]  Fabio Bruno,et al.  Virtual and Augmented Reality Tools to Improve the Exploitation of Underwater Archaeological Sites by Diver and Non-diver Tourists , 2016, EuroMed.

[16]  Fabio Bruno,et al.  Development and integration of digital technologies addressed to raise awareness and access to European underwater cultural heritage. An overview of the H2020 i-MARECULTURE project , 2017, OCEANS 2017 - Aberdeen.

[17]  Djamel Merad,et al.  Underwater image preprocessing for automated photogrammetry in high turbidity water: An application on the Arles-Rhone XIII roman wreck in the Rhodano river, France , 2012, 2012 18th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia.

[18]  Panagiotis Agrafiotis,et al.  State of the art and applications in archaeological underwater 3D recording and mapping , 2018, Journal of Cultural Heritage.

[19]  Stuart Jeffrey,et al.  A new Digital Dark Age? Collaborative web tools, social media and long-term preservation , 2012 .

[20]  Kotaro Yamafune,et al.  Using Computer Vision Photogrammetry (Agisoft PhotoScan) to Record and Analyze Underwater Shipwreck Sites , 2016 .

[21]  Justin K. Dix,et al.  The use of a high-resolution 3D Chirp sub-bottom profiler for the reconstruction of the shallow water archaeological site of the Grace Dieu (1439), River Hamble, UK , 2009 .

[22]  G. Klinker,et al.  An Underwater Augmented Reality system for commercial diving operations , 2009, OCEANS 2009.

[23]  Jonathan Adams,et al.  4D modelling of low visibility Underwater Archaeological excavations using multi-source photogrammetry in the Bulgarian Black Sea , 2018, Journal of Archaeological Science.

[24]  Rory Quinn,et al.  The role of time-lapse bathymetric surveys in assessing morphological change at shipwreck sites , 2010 .

[25]  Holly Wright,et al.  Pencils and Pixels: Drawing and Digital Media in Archaeological Field Recording , 2018 .

[26]  Fabio Bruno,et al.  Project iMARECULTURE: Advanced VR, iMmersive Serious Games and Augmented REality as Tools to Raise Awareness and Access to European Underwater CULTURal heritagE , 2016, EuroMed.

[27]  Jeremy N. Green,et al.  Maritime Archaeology: A Technical Handbook , 1990 .

[28]  Xavier Muth,et al.  Photogrammetry as a tool for integrating archival data in archaeological fieldwork : Examples from the Middle Palaeolithic sites of Combe–Grenal, Le Moustier, and Regourdou , 2016 .

[29]  Fabio Menna,et al.  A CRITICAL REVIEW OF AUTOMATED PHOTOGRAMMETRICPROCESSING OF LARGE DATASETS , 2017 .

[30]  Carlo Beltrame,et al.  Photogrammetry in maritime and underwater archaeology: two marble wrecks from Sicily , 2015, Optical Metrology.

[31]  Shih-Han Samuel Lin,et al.  Lading of the Late Bronze Age ship at Uluburun , 2012 .

[32]  Tine Missiaen,et al.  Archaeological prospection of the nearshore and intertidal area using ultra‐high resolution marine acoustic techniques: Results from a test study on the Belgian coast at Ostend‐Raversijde , 2018 .

[33]  C. Richard Bates,et al.  Geophysical Methods for Wreck‐Site Monitoring: the Rapid Archaeological Site Surveying and Evaluation (RASSE) programme , 2011 .

[34]  Ian Moffat,et al.  3D mapping of the submerged Crowie barge using electrical resistivity tomography , 2018 .

[35]  Brian R. Calder,et al.  Marine Heritage Monitoring with High Resolution Survey Tools: ScapaMAP 2001-2006 , 2007 .

[36]  Andrew J. Woods.  3D or 3-D: a study of terminology, usage and style , 2013 .

[37]  Dimitrios Skarlatos,et al.  A serious game for understanding ancient seafaring in the Mediterranean sea , 2017, 2017 9th International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games).

[38]  G. Bass.  Archaeology Under Water , 1966 .

[39]  Jonathan Benjamin,et al.  Archaeology Hijacked: Addressing the Historical Misappropriations of Maritime and Underwater Archaeology , 2018 .

[40]  T. Van Damme,et al.  Computer Vision Photogrammetry for Underwater Archaeological Site Recording in a Low-Visibility Environment , 2015 .

[41]  Pierre Drap,et al.  We All Live in a Virtual Submarine , 2010, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[42]  Gianluca Cantoro,et al.  Shallow Off-Shore Archaeological Prospection with 3-D Electrical Resistivity Tomography: The Case of Olous (Modern Elounda), Greece , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[43]  G. Bass,et al.  Cape Gelidonya: a bronze age shipwreck , 1967 .

[44]  Nicholas Hudson,et al.  Importing Clay for Local Pottery Production in the 4th Century b.c. at Tell el-Timai, Egypt , 2018 .

[45]  C. Briese,et al.  Airborne laser bathymetry – detecting and recording submerged archaeological sites from the air , 2013 .

[46]  Jun Rekimoto,et al.  AquaCAVE: Augmented Swimming Environment with Immersive Surround-Screen Virtual Reality , 2016, UIST.

[47]  Martin Gutowski,et al.  3D sub-bottom profiling — High resolution 3D imaging of shallow subsurface structures and buried objects , 2015, OCEANS 2015 - Genova.

[48]  Dimitrios Skarlatos,et al.  3D MODELLING AND MAPPING FOR VIRTUAL EXPLORATION OF UNDERWATER ARCHAEOLOGY ASSETS , 2017 .

[49]  S. Campana.  Drones in Archaeology. State‐of‐the‐art and Future Perspectives , 2017 .

[50]  Rodrigo Torres,et al.  Multi-Image Photogrammetry to Record and Reconstruct Underwater Shipwreck Sites , 2017 .

[51]  Jonathan Benjamin,et al.  Multi-image Photogrammetry for Underwater Archaeological Site Recording: An Accessible, Diver-Based Approach , 2014, Journal of Maritime Archaeology.

[52]  Malik Mallem,et al.  Virtual Exploration of Underwater Archaeological Sites: Visualization and Interaction in Mixed Reality Environments , 2008, VAST.

[53]  Justin K. Dix,et al.  Mapping of the Buried Yarmouth Roads Wreck, Isle of Wight, UK, using a Chirp Sub‐Bottom Profiler , 2008 .

[54]  Robert Church,et al.  Utilization of Multibeam Bathymetry and Backscatter for Documenting and Planning Detailed Investigations of Deepwater Archaeological Sites , 2010 .

[55]  C. R. Orton,et al.  Stochastic process and archaeological mechanism in spatial analysis , 1982 .

[56]  Justin K. Dix,et al.  Decimeter-resolution 3D seismic volume in shallow water: A case study in small-object detection , 2008 .

[57]  Matthew Johnson-Roberson,et al.  Mapping Submerged Archaeological Sites using Stereo‐Vision Photogrammetry , 2013 .

[58]  Djamel Merad,et al.  Underwater Photogrammetry for Archaeology. What Will Be the Next Step , 2013 .

[59]  N. Papadopoulos,et al.  Archaeological investigations in the shallow seawater environment with electrical resistivity tomography , 2015 .

[60]  Stefan B. Williams,et al.  Reconstructing pavlopetri: Mapping the world's oldest submerged town using stereo-vision , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[61]  Alicia Caporaso.  Formation Processes of Maritime Archaeological Landscapes , 2017 .

[62]  Nick Rule,et al.  The Direct Survey Method (DSM) of underwater survey, and its application underwater , 1989 .

[63]  Cheng-Wei Wu,et al.  SS: Multibeam Backscatter: Utilization of Multibeam Bathymetry and Backscatter For Documenting and Planning Detailed Investigations of Deepwater Archaeological Sites , 2010 .