Cue Phrase Selection in Instruction Dialogue Using Machine Learning

The purpose of this paper is to identify e ective factors for selecting discourse organization cue phrases in instruction dialogue that signal changes in discourse structure such as topic shifts and attentional state changes. By using a machine learning technique, a variety of features concerning discourse structure, task structure, and dialogue context are examined in terms of their e ectiveness and the best set of learning features is identi ed. Our result reveals that, in addition to discourse structure, already identi ed in previous studies, task structure and dialogue context play an important role. Moreover, an evaluation using a large dialogue corpus shows the utility of applying machine learning techniques to cue phrase selection.

[1]  Victor Zue,et al.  Empirical evaluation of human performance and agreement in parsing discourse constituents in spoken dialogue , 1995, EUROSPEECH.

[2]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Instructions for annotating discourse , 1995 .

[3]  A. Knott,et al.  Using Linguistic Phenomena to Motivate a Set of Coherence Relations. , 1994 .

[4]  Jean Carletta,et al.  Assessing Agreement on Classification Tasks: The Kappa Statistic , 1996, CL.

[5]  Anna-Brita Stenström,et al.  An Introduction To Spoken Interaction , 1994 .

[6]  William C. Mann,et al.  RHETORICAL STRUCTURE THEORY: A THEORY OF TEXT ORGANIZATION , 1987 .

[7]  J. Fleiss Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[8]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[9]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Discourse structure and performance efficiency in interactive and non-interactive spoken modalities☆ , 1991 .

[10]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Using Discourse Analysis and Automatic Text Generation to Study Discourse Cue Usage , 1995 .

[11]  Raymonde Guindon,et al.  The Structure of User-Adviser Dialogues: Is there Method in their Madness? , 1986, ACL.

[12]  Rebecca J. Passonneau,et al.  Discourse Segmentation by Human and Automated Means , 1997, CL.

[13]  A. Cawsey Book Reviews: Participating in Explanatory Dialogues: Interpreting and Responding to Questions in Context , 1995, CL.

[14]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  The representation and use of focus in dialogue understanding. , 1977 .

[15]  Guy Lapalme,et al.  Content and Rhetorical Status Selection in Instructional Texts , 1994, INLG.

[16]  Michael Elhadad,et al.  Generating Connectives , 1990, COLING.

[17]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Learning Features that Predict Cue Usage , 1997, ACL.

[18]  A. Dobson,et al.  Assessing agreement , 1989, The Medical journal of Australia.

[19]  Manfred Stede,et al.  Customizing RST for the Automatic Production of Technical Manuals , 1992, NLG.

[20]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Investigating Cue Selection and Placement in Tutorial Discourse , 1995, ACL.

[21]  Robin Cohen,et al.  A Computational Theory of the Function of Clue Words in Argument Understanding , 1984, ACL.

[22]  金田 重郎,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning (書評) , 1995 .

[23]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse , 1986, CL.

[24]  Alison Cawsey,et al.  Explanation and interaction - the computer generation of explanatory dialogues , 1992, ACL-MIT press series in natural language processing.