Explanation Feedback Is Better Than Correct Answer Feedback for Promoting Transfer of Learning

Among the many factors that influence the efficacy of feedback on learning, the information contained in the feedback message is arguably the most important. One common assumption is that there is a benefit to increasing the complexity of the feedback message beyond providing the correct answer. Surprisingly, studies that have manipulated the content of the feedback message in order to isolate the unique effect of greater complexity have failed to support this assumption. However, the final test in most of these studies consisted of a repetition of the same questions from the initial test. The present research investigated whether feedback that provides an explanation of the correct answer promotes superior transfer of learning to new questions. In 2 experiments, subjects studied prose passages and then took an initial short-answer test on concepts from the text. After each question, they received correct answer feedback, explanation feedback, or no feedback (Experiment 1 only). Two days later, subjects returned for a final test that consisted of both repeated questions and new inference questions. The results showed that correct answer feedback and explanation feedback led to equivalent performance on the repeated questions, but explanation feedback produced superior performance on the new inference questions.

[1]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  Feedback complexity and corrective efficiency , 1985 .

[2]  D. Gilman Comparison of Several Feedback Methods for Correcting Errors by Computer-Assisted Instruction. , 1969 .

[3]  H. Pashler,et al.  When does feedback facilitate learning of words? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  David Coniam,et al.  Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice , 2014 .

[5]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[6]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  J. B. Stroud,et al.  Effect of Informing Pupils of the Correctness of Their Responses to Objective Test Questions , 1942 .

[8]  Larry Ambrose,et al.  The power of feedback. , 2002, Healthcare executive.

[9]  Dolores Karolick,et al.  Cognitive Styles and Feedback in Computer-Assisted Instruction , 1995 .

[10]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[11]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[12]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events , 1991 .

[13]  Elizabeth J. Marsh,et al.  Receiving right/wrong feedback: Consequences for learning , 2010, Memory.

[14]  V. Shute Focus on Formative Feedback , 2008 .

[15]  H. Roediger,et al.  III Enhances Later Recall Enhancing Retention Through Reconsolidation : Negative Emotional Arousal Following Retrieval , 2011 .

[16]  M. Rosenbaum,et al.  Beyond direct verbal instructions in cognitive behavioral supervision , 1998 .

[17]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[18]  R. W. Kulhavy,et al.  Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude , 1989 .

[19]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  AutoTutor: an intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[20]  Andrew C Butler,et al.  Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  R. W. Kulhavy Feedback in Written Instruction , 1977 .

[22]  Jonathan L. C. Lee Reconsolidation: maintaining memory relevance , 2009, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  J. Peeck Effects of Differential Feedback on the Answering of Two Types of Questions by Fifth- and Sixth-Graders. , 1979 .

[24]  B. Jean Mandernach Relative Effectiveness of Computer-based and Human Feedback for Enhancing Student Learning , 2005 .

[25]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Enhancing Retention Through Reconsolidation , 2011, Psychological science.

[26]  J. A. McGeoch The Psychology of Human Learning--An Introduction. , 1944 .

[27]  Susan M. Barnett,et al.  When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Mary McCormick,et al.  Learning as a consequence of the learner's task involvement under different conditions of feedback. , 1964 .

[29]  Cheryl E. Sanders,et al.  Advice and Feedback: Elements of Practice for Problem Solving , 1994 .

[30]  E. Mory Feedback research revisited. , 2004 .

[31]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[32]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Tests and test feedback as learning sources , 1991 .

[33]  J. Sassenrath,et al.  Effects of differential feedback from examinations on retention and transfer. , 1965, Journal of educational psychology.

[34]  W. J. Roper Feedback in Computer Assisted Instruction , 1977 .

[35]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Delayed versus immediate feedback in children’s and adults’ vocabulary learning , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[36]  Andrew S. Gibbons,et al.  Computer-Based Instruction: Design and Development , 1998 .

[37]  A. Hupbach,et al.  Reconsolidation of episodic memories: a subtle reminder triggers integration of new information. , 2007, Learning & memory.

[38]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 1985, Science.

[39]  A. C. Butler,et al.  The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  Yadin Dudai,et al.  Reconsolidation: the advantage of being refocused , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[41]  James D. Klein,et al.  Control of feedback in computer-assisted instruction , 1991 .

[42]  Tamara van Gog,et al.  Content and timing of feedback in a web-based learning environment: effects on learning as a function of prior knowledge , 2008, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[43]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Discourse comprehension. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[44]  Thomas Andre,et al.  Level of Adjunct Question, Type of Feedback, and Learning Concepts by Reading. , 1988 .

[45]  P. Winne,et al.  Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1995 .