How culture gets embrained: Cultural differences in event-related potentials of social norm violations

Significance Despite the fact that social norms are a fundamental aspect of human nature, there has been little research on how social norm violations are detected at the neurobiological level. Combining a new social norm violation paradigm with cross-cultural electroencephalography, we show consistent negative deflection of event-related potential around 400 ms (N400) over the central and parietal regions for both Americans and Chinese in detecting norm violations. However, the N400 at the frontal and temporal regions was evident only among Chinese, illustrating culture-specific neural substrates underlying detecting norm violations. Moreover, the frontal N400 was associated with greater cultural superiority and self-control, as well as lower creativity. The findings shed new light on the neurobiology of the detection of social norm violations. Humans are unique among all species in their ability to develop and enforce social norms, but there is wide variation in the strength of social norms across human societies. Despite this fundamental aspect of human nature, there has been surprisingly little research on how social norm violations are detected at the neurobiological level. Building on the emerging field of cultural neuroscience, we combine noninvasive electroencephalography (EEG) with a new social norm violation paradigm to examine the neural mechanisms underlying the detection of norm violations and how they vary across cultures. EEG recordings from Chinese and US participants (n = 50) showed consistent negative deflection of event-related potential around 400 ms (N400) over the central and parietal regions that served as a culture-general neural marker of detecting norm violations. The N400 at the frontal and temporal regions, however, was only observed among Chinese but not US participants, illustrating culture-specific neural substrates of the detection of norm violations. Further, the frontal N400 predicted a variety of behavioral and attitudinal measurements related to the strength of social norms that have been found at the national and state levels, including higher culture superiority and self-control but lower creativity. There were no cultural differences in the N400 induced by semantic violation, suggesting a unique cultural influence on social norm violation detection. In all, these findings provided the first evidence, to our knowledge, for the neurobiological foundations of social norm violation detection and its variation across cultures.

[1]  Dana S. Nau,et al.  Societal threat and cultural variation in the strength of social norms: An evolutionary basis , 2015 .

[2]  Michael Koenigs,et al.  Investigating emotion in moral cognition: a review of evidence from functional neuroimaging and neuropsychology. , 2007, British medical bulletin.

[3]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  How (and where) does moral judgment work? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Peter Kirsch,et al.  Beyond revenge: Neural and genetic bases of altruistic punishment , 2011, NeuroImage.

[5]  D. D. de Quervain,et al.  The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment , 2004, Science.

[6]  B. Keysar,et al.  The Effect of Culture on Perspective Taking , 2007, Psychological science.

[7]  Vincent M. Reid,et al.  N400 involvement in the processing of action sequences , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  M. Kutas,et al.  An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[9]  S. Goto,et al.  Cultural differences in the visual processing of meaning: detecting incongruities between background and foreground objects using the N400. , 2010, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[10]  A. Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[11]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2001, Science.

[12]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Socioeconomic status and the brain: mechanistic insights from human and animal research , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Michele J. Gelfand,et al.  Tightness–looseness across the 50 united states , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  K. White,et al.  Wait, what? Assessing stereotype incongruities using the N400 ERP component. , 2009, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[16]  J. Caplan,et al.  N400 incongruity effect in an episodic memory task reveals different strategies for handling irrelevant contextual information for Japanese than European Canadians , 2014, Cognitive neuroscience.

[17]  F. Rösler,et al.  Event-related potentials during auditory language processing in congenitally blind and sighted people , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  K. Lowenberg,et al.  Cultural differences in sensitivity to social context: Detecting affective incongruity using the N400 , 2013, Social neuroscience.

[20]  Yannig Roth,et al.  The Impact of Culture on Creativity , 2015 .

[21]  L. Bauer,et al.  N400 as an index of semantic expectancies: Differential effects of alcohol and cocaine dependence , 2005, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[22]  Regine Bader,et al.  The FN400 is functionally distinct from the N400 , 2012, NeuroImage.

[23]  Yaxu Zhang,et al.  Brain responses to agreement violations of Chinese grammatical aspect , 2008, Neuroreport.

[24]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[25]  S. Goto,et al.  Switching between Mii and Wii: The effects of cultural priming on the social affective N400 , 2014 .

[26]  W. Prinz,et al.  N400-like negativities in action perception reflect the activation of two components of an action representation , 2009, Social neuroscience.

[27]  Molly V. Lucas,et al.  Oxytocin enhances brain function in children with autism , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  J. Grafman,et al.  The neural basis of human moral cognition , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  J. Grafman,et al.  Opinion: the neural basis of human moral cognition. , 2005, Nature reviews. Neuroscience.

[30]  Patric Bach,et al.  Communicating hands: ERPs elicited by meaningful symbolic hand postures , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[31]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[32]  Stéphane Côté,et al.  Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  S. Kitayama,et al.  Spontaneous Trait Inference Is Culture-Specific , 2011, Psychological science.

[34]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2004, Science.

[35]  E. Epel,et al.  Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. , 2000, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[36]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[37]  Josep Marco-Pallarés,et al.  Genetic Variability in the Dopamine System (Dopamine Receptor D4, Catechol-O-Methyltransferase) Modulates Neurophysiological Responses to Gains and Losses , 2009, Biological Psychiatry.

[38]  Kibum Kim,et al.  Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study , 2011, Science.

[39]  A. Proverbio,et al.  When neurons do not mirror the agent's intentions: Sex differences in neural coding of goal-directed actions , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  Michael E. W. Varnum,et al.  Social class differences in N400 indicate differences in spontaneous trait inference. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[41]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words , 1980, Biological Psychology.

[42]  J. Guilford,et al.  The nature of human intelligence. , 1968 .

[43]  Catherine T. Kwantes,et al.  World Values Survey , 2015 .

[44]  S. Kitayama,et al.  Interdependence modulates the brain response to word-voice incongruity. , 2010, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.