Effect of alignment changes on socket reaction moments during gait in transfemoral and knee-disarticulation prostheses: case series.

The alignment of a lower-limb prosthesis is critical to the successful prosthetic fitting and utilization by the wearer. Loads generated by the socket applied to the residual limb while walking are thought to be different in transfemoral and knee-disarticulation prostheses. The aim of this case series was to compare the socket reaction moments between transfemoral and knee-disarticulation prostheses and to investigate the effect of alignment changes on them. Two amputees, one with a transfemoral prosthesis and another with a knee-disarticulation prosthesis, participated in this study. A Smart Pyramid™ was used to measure socket reaction moments while walking under 9 selected alignment conditions; including nominally aligned, angle malalignments of 6° (flexion, extension, abduction and adduction) and translation malalignments of 15 mm (anterior, posterior, medial and lateral) of the socket relative to the foot. This study found that the pattern of the socket reaction moments was similar between transfemoral and knee-disarticulation prostheses. An extension moment in the sagittal plane and a varus moment in the coronal plane were dominant during stance under the nominally aligned condition. This study also demonstrated that alignment changes might have consistent effects on the socket reaction moments in transfemoral and knee-disarticulation prostheses. Extension and posterior translation of the socket resulted in increases in an extension moment, while abduction and lateral translation of the socket resulted in increases in a varus moment. The socket reaction moments may potentially serve as useful biomechanical parameters to evaluate alignment in transfemoral and knee-disarticulation prostheses.

[1]  Smith Dg,et al.  Atlas Of Amputations and Limb Deficiencies : Surgical, Prosthetic, and Rehabilitation Principles , 2004 .

[2]  R Dumas,et al.  Loading applied on prosthetic knee of transfemoral amputee: comparison of inverse dynamics and direct measurements. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[3]  John Sullivan,et al.  Monitoring of the load regime applied on the osseointegrated fixation of a trans-femoral amputee: A tool for evidence-based practice , 2008, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[4]  Laurent Frossard,et al.  Dynamic input to determine hip joint moments, power and work on the prosthetic limb of transfemoral amputees: ground reaction vs knee reaction , 2011, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[5]  J. P. Paul,et al.  Alignment of lower-limb prostheses. , 1986, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  Kerstin Hagberg,et al.  Kinetics of transfemoral amputees with osseointegrated fixation performing common activities of daily living. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  David L. Jaffe,et al.  Rehabilitation Research and Development Center , 1995 .

[8]  M. Orendurff,et al.  Influence of malalignment on socket reaction moments during gait in amputees with transtibial prostheses. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[9]  S G Zachariah,et al.  A modular six-directional force sensor for prosthetic assessment: a technical note. , 1997, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  Ming Zhang,et al.  Effect of alignment changes on sagittal and coronal socket reaction moment interactions in transtibial prostheses. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  John H. Evans,et al.  Development and Preliminary Testing of a Device for the Direct Measurement of Forces and Moments in the Prosthetic Limb of Transfemoral Amputees during Activities of Daily Living , 2003 .

[12]  J Hughes,et al.  Biomechanics of the through-knee prosthesis , 1983, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[13]  Steven Gray,et al.  Magnitude and variability of loading on the osseointegrated implant of transfemoral amputees during walking. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  Clayton J Adam,et al.  FE stress analysis of the interface between the bone and an osseointegrated implant for amputees--implications to refine the rehabilitation program. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  Edward S. Neumann,et al.  Regression Estimates of Pressure on Transtibial Residual Limbs Using Load Cell Measurements of the Forces and Moments Occurring at the Base of the Socket , 2013 .

[16]  Ming Zhang,et al.  Effect of transtibial prosthesis alignment changes on out-of-plane socket reaction moments during walking in amputees. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Ming Zhang,et al.  Perception of socket alignment perturbations in amputees with transtibial prostheses. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  Paul Stephenson,et al.  Estimation of forces at the interface between an artificial limb and an implant directly fixed into the femur in above-knee amputees , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[19]  Laurent Frossard,et al.  Functional Outcome of Transfemoral Amputees Fitted With an Osseointegrated Fixation: Temporal Gait Characteristics , 2010 .

[20]  I. Krajbich Lower‐Limb Deficiencies and Amputations in Children , 1998, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[21]  S. Stanhope,et al.  Sensitivity of joint moments to changes in walking speed and body-weight-support are interdependent and vary across joints. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Susan J Hillman,et al.  Repeatability of a new observational gait score for unilateral lower limb amputees. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[23]  Nicolas E. Walsh,et al.  Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deficiencies: Surgical, Prosthetic, and Rehabilitation Principles. 3rd ed. , 2006 .

[24]  T. Schmalz,et al.  Energy expenditure and biomechanical characteristics of lower limb amputee gait: the influence of prosthetic alignment and different prosthetic components. , 2002, Gait & posture.