Clinical contrast sensitivity chart evaluation

Three different types of contrast sensitivity chart were used on normal patients by six optometrists in clinical practice. The charts were the Vistech, the Pelli ‐Robson and the Cambridge low‐contrast gratings test. We examine the data in terms of the differences between optometrists and the variation of contrast sensitivity with the age of the patient. There was a highly significant difference between the scores from different optometrists for all three charts. We attribute this to variability in measurement technique. There was also a highly significant effect of age for all three charts, with older observers tending to exhibit lower contrast sensitivity. On the Vistech chart, this sensitivity deficit was most pronounced at higher spatial frequencies. The level of redundant information in the tests is discussed.

[1]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[2]  G. Rubin RELIABILITY AND SENSITIVITY OF CLINICAL CONTRAST SENSITIVITY TESTS , 1988 .

[3]  C. McGrath,et al.  Assessment of the optical contributions to the age-related deterioration in vision. , 1985, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology.

[4]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  D. Whitaker,et al.  Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli‐Robson chart , 1990, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[6]  A P Ginsburg,et al.  A New Contrast Sensitivity Vision Test Chart , 1984, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[7]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood , 1982, Vision Research.

[8]  Arnold J. Wilkins,et al.  Age-related norms for the Cambridge low contrast gratings, including details concerning their design and use , 1988 .

[9]  M E Sloane,et al.  Aging and luminance-adaptation effects on spatial contrast sensitivity. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  GERALD M. LONG,et al.  Reliabilities of Alternate Measures of Contrast Sensitivity Functions , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[11]  Assessment of the Vistech contrast sensitivity test for repeated-measures applications. , 1990 .

[12]  H F Sanderson,et al.  Observer variation in ophthalmology. , 1980, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  A Bradley,et al.  A comparison of clinical acuity and contrast sensitivity charts: effect of uncorrected myopia , 1991, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[14]  M. Bullimore,et al.  Improving the Reliability of the Pelli-Robson Contrast Sensitivity Test , 1991, Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System.

[15]  A. Hill,et al.  Test—retest reliability of the Arden Grating Test: inter‐tester variability , 1988, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[16]  Assessment of the Vistech Contrast Sensitivity Test for Repeated‐Measures Applications , 1990, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  D. Koch,et al.  Survey of the clinical use of glare and contrast sensitivity testing , 1990, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[18]  D Whitaker,et al.  How Useful are Contrast Sensitivity Charts in Optometric Practice? Case Reports , 1992, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  A. Hill,et al.  Vistech VCTS 6500 Charts—Within- and Between-Session Reliability , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[20]  K E Higgins,et al.  Spatial contrast sensitivity: effects of age, test-retest, and psychophysical method. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  J E Lovie-Kitchin,et al.  High and Low Contrast Acuity and Clinical Contrast Sensitivity Tested in a Normal Population , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[22]  D B Elliott,et al.  The reliability of the Pelli‐Robson contrast sensitivity chart , 1990, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.