Productivity equation of fractured well in CBM reservoirs

Abstract Due to complex process of CBM transport associated with desorption and diffusion, there has not been an explicit and accurate prediction formula of CBM production for fractured wells. This article presented a productivity equation of fractured well in CBM reservoir regarding desorption and diffusion. Elliptical flow pattern exists around the hydraulically fractured well, and the flow field was divided into two regions. One is high-velocity non-linear flow in artificial fracture, and the other is Darcy flow in elliptical region controlled by artificial fracture. Mathematical models for the elliptical gas flow were established based on conservation of mass and momentum equations, in which Langmuir equation, Fick pseudo-steady state law, and function of pseudo pressure were combined to consider effect of desorption and diffusion. The productivity equation of hydraulically fractured well was presented by coupling the analytical solutions to elliptical gas flow. Effect on gas rate of reservoir properties and production parameters such as desorption rate, diffusion coefficient, drawdown pressure, half-length of artificial fracture, and flow conductivity were clarified based on the productivity equation. It is seen that there exist optimal drawdown pressure and optimal half-length of hydraulic fracture dependent on other parameters. In the excess of optimal values, gas rate will reach a plateau and respond with little increment along with the increase of drawdown pressure or half-length. Consequently, the research provides direct insight of the effect of various parameters on gas rate and theoretical foundation for optimization design of CBM development.

[1]  L. Connell,et al.  Modelling permeability for coal reservoirs: A review of analytical models and testing data , 2012 .

[2]  Sam Ameri,et al.  Predicting production performance of CBM reservoirs , 2009 .

[3]  Derek Elsworth,et al.  Permeability evolution in fractured coal: The roles of fracture geometry and water-content , 2011 .

[4]  D. Tang,et al.  Coal Permeability Damage Caused by Production Pressure Difference , 2012 .

[5]  Xiexing Miao,et al.  Development of anisotropic permeability during coalbed methane production , 2010 .

[6]  Guoliang Chen,et al.  Influence of gas production induced volumetric strain on permeability of coal , 1997 .

[7]  L. Anna Groundwater flow associated with coalbed gas production, Ferron Sandstone, east-central Utah , 2003 .

[8]  J. K. Thompson,et al.  Use Of Constant Pressure, Finite Capacity Type Curves For Performance Prediction Of Fractured Wells In Low-Permeability Reservoirs , 1981 .

[9]  Gregory R. King,et al.  Comparative evaluation of vertical and horizontal drainage wells for the degasification of coal seams , 1988 .

[10]  Z.-M. Wang,et al.  Critical Thickness of a Low Permeable Coal Bed for Horizontal Well Production in China , 2010 .

[11]  Prashant Singh,et al.  Geological and Petrological Considerations for Coal Bed Methane Exploration: A Review , 2011 .

[12]  M. Rahman,et al.  Analytical Production Modeling for Hydraulically Fractured Gas Reservoirs , 2007 .

[13]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  Coupled flow and geomechanical processes during gas production from coal seams , 2009 .

[14]  Hongqing Song,et al.  Pressure Characteristics and Effective Deployment in a Water-Bearing Tight Gas Reservoir with Low-Velocity Non-Darcy Flow , 2011 .

[15]  C. Karacan,et al.  Fracture/cleat analysis of coals from Zonguldak Basin (northwestern Turkey) relative to the potential of coalbed methane production , 2000 .

[16]  J. Geertsma Estimating the Coefficient of Inertial Resistance in Fluid Flow Through Porous Media , 1974 .

[17]  Zhongwei Chen,et al.  Effects of non-Darcy flow on the performance of coal seam gas wells , 2012 .

[18]  C. N. Roberts Fracture Optimization In A Tight Gas Play: Muddy "J" Formation, Wattenberg Field, Colorado , 1981 .

[19]  Y. Meng,et al.  Modeling transient flow behavior of a horizontal well in a coal seam , 2012 .