Measurement of Unbound Drug Exposure in Brain: Modeling of pH Partitioning Explains Diverging Results between the Brain Slice and Brain Homogenate Methods

Currently used methodology for determining unbound drug exposure in brain combines measurement of the total drug concentration in the whole brain in vivo with estimation of brain tissue binding from one of two available in vitro methods: equilibrium dialysis of brain homogenate and the brain slice uptake method. This study of 56 compounds compares the fraction of unbound drug in brain (fu,brain), determined using the brain homogenate method, with the unbound volume of distribution in brain (Vu,brain), determined using the brain slice method. Discrepancies were frequent and were primarily related to drug pH partitioning, attributable to the preservation of cellular structures in the slice that are absent in the homogenate. A mathematical model for pH partitioning into acidic intracellular compartments was derived to predict the slice Vu,brain from measurements of fu,brain and drug pKa. This model allowed prediction of Vu,brain from fu,brain within a 2.2-fold error range for 95% of the drugs compared with a 4.5-fold error range using the brain homogenate fu,brain method alone. The greatest discrepancies between the methods occurred with compounds that are actively transported into brain cells, including gabapentin, metformin, and prototypic organic cation transporter substrates. It was concluded that intrabrain drug distribution is governed by several diverse mechanisms in addition to nonspecific binding and that the slice method is therefore more reliable than the homogenate method. As an alternative, predictions of Vu,brain can be made from homogenate fu,brain using the pH partition model presented, although this model does not take into consideration possible active brain cell uptake.

[1]  G. Rappold,et al.  Molecular identification of the corticosterone-sensitive extraneuronal catecholamine transporter , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  P. Tulkens,et al.  Commentary. Lysosomotropic agents. , 1974, Biochemical pharmacology.

[3]  B Poole,et al.  Fluorescence probe measurement of the intralysosomal pH in living cells and the perturbation of pH by various agents. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  J. Castle,et al.  Expression profiles of 50 xenobiotic transporter genes in humans and pre-clinical species: A resource for investigations into drug disposition , 2006, Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems.

[5]  E. Lunney,et al.  Transport of Gabapentin, a γ‐Amino Acid Drug, by System L α‐Amino Acid Transporters: A Comparative Study in Astrocytes, Synaptosomes, and CHO Cells , 1995 .

[6]  S. Masuda,et al.  Metformin is a superior substrate for renal organic cation transporter OCT2 rather than hepatic OCT1. , 2005, Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics.

[7]  R. Bendayan,et al.  Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins: Expression and Function in the Central Nervous System , 2006, Pharmacological Reviews.

[8]  J. Lake,et al.  Acidic vesicles in cultured rat hepatocytes. Identification and characterization of their relationship to lysosomes and other storage vesicles. , 1987, Gastroenterology.

[9]  S. Higuchi,et al.  Investigation of the high partition of YM992, a novel antidepressant, in rat brain ‐ in vitro and in vivo evidence for the high binding in brain and the high permeability at the BBB , 2002, Biopharmaceutics & drug disposition.

[10]  Johan Ulander,et al.  High-throughput pKa screening and prediction amenable for ADME profiling , 2006, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[11]  U. Honegger,et al.  The contribution of lysosomal trapping in the uptake of desipramine and chloroquine by different tissues. , 1995, Pharmacology & toxicology.

[12]  Ewald R. Weibel,et al.  CORRELATED MORPHOMETRIC AND BIOCHEMICAL STUDIES ON THE LIVER CELL , 1969, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  R. A. Thompson,et al.  High-throughput screening of pKa values of pharmaceuticals by pressure-assisted capillary electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. , 2003, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[14]  T. Walle,et al.  Extensive and saturable accumulation of paclitaxel by the human platelet , 2004, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[15]  Ulf Bredberg,et al.  Development of a High-Throughput Brain Slice Method for Studying Drug Distribution in the Central Nervous System , 2009, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[16]  Yanfeng Wang,et al.  The Simultaneous Estimation of the Influx and Efflux Blood-Brain Barrier Permeabilities of Gabapentin Using a Microdialysis-Pharmacokinetic Approach , 1996, Pharmaceutical Research.

[17]  T. Maurer,et al.  Influence of nonspecific brain and plasma binding on CNS exposure: implications for rational drug discovery , 2002, Biopharmaceutics & drug disposition.

[18]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Extracellular space structure revealed by diffusion analysis , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  Anders Tunek,et al.  High-throughput screening of drug-brain tissue binding and in silico prediction for assessment of central nervous system drug delivery. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[20]  G. Schuhmann,et al.  Prediction of drug distribution in vivo on the basis of in vitro binding data. , 1987, Biopharmaceutics & drug disposition.

[21]  Michael S Roberts,et al.  Ion-Trapping, Microsomal Binding, and Unbound Drug Distribution in the Hepatic Retention of Basic Drugs , 2004, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[22]  F. Lang,et al.  Cloning and characterization of two human polyspecific organic cation transporters. , 1997, DNA and cell biology.

[23]  I. Hidalgo,et al.  Application and limitation of inhibitors in drug-transporter interactions studies. , 2008, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[24]  B. Brodie,et al.  The gastric secretion of drugs: a pH partition hypothesis. , 1957, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[25]  Susanne Winiwarter,et al.  Structure-brain exposure relationships in rat and human using a novel data set of unbound drug concentrations in brain interstitial and cerebrospinal fluids. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[26]  U. Bredberg,et al.  In Vitro Methods for Estimating Unbound Drug Concentrations in the Brain Interstitial and Intracellular Fluids , 2007, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[27]  D. Cutler,et al.  The potential role of lysosomes in tissue distribution of weak bases , 1988, Biopharmaceutics & drug disposition.

[28]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[29]  M. Monshouwer,et al.  Unbound Drug Concentration in Brain Homogenate and Cerebral Spinal Fluid at Steady State as a Surrogate for Unbound Concentration in Brain Interstitial Fluid , 2009, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[30]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[31]  Hans Rudolf Gnägi,et al.  CORRELATED MORPHOMETRIC AND BIOCHEMICAL STUDIES ON THE LIVER CELL , 1969, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  W. J. Waddell,et al.  Calculation of intracellular pH from the distribution of 5,5-dimethyl-2,4-oxazolidinedione (DMO); application to skeletal muscle of the dog. , 1959, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[33]  Maurice G. Kendall The advanced theory of statistics , 1958 .

[34]  Y. Sugiyama,et al.  Brain efflux index as a novel method of analyzing efflux transport at the blood-brain barrier. , 1996, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[35]  Hugh Davson,et al.  Physiology of the CSF and Blood-Brain Barriers , 1996 .

[36]  Y. Sugiyama,et al.  Comparison between in‐vivo and in‐vitro tissue‐to‐plasma unbound concentration ratios (Kp,f) of quinidine in rats , 1984, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.